Foundation of Conservatism

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Really? Because the Patriot Act didn't exactly shore it up, now did it bunky? And it was with the GOP spearhead and the panicky acquiesence of the Dems....with BOTH sides admitting they didn't even read most of the damned thing.

And then there were these gems from the Shrub's legal eagle Gonzales (before he was kicked to the curb):

"The Constitution does not say that every citizen has the right to habeas corpus."

"The Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it is"

Those are just samples showing that once again, you just don't know what the hell you're talking about. My original assessment stands.

Sounds like judicial activism. Ain;t that from librulism?

No stupid, it's not. Grow up and deal with the facts....the "conservatism" of Nixon, Reagan and the Bush family is NOT conducive to the principles and guidelines of what the Constitution stands for. Hell, even Ashcroft realized that when Gonzales was trying to get that signature in his hospital room.
 
Really? Because the Patriot Act didn't exactly shore it up, now did it bunky? And it was with the GOP spearhead and the panicky acquiesence of the Dems....with BOTH sides admitting they didn't even read most of the damned thing.

And then there were these gems from the Shrub's legal eagle Gonzales (before he was kicked to the curb):

"The Constitution does not say that every citizen has the right to habeas corpus."

"The Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it is"

Those are just samples showing that once again, you just don't know what the hell you're talking about. My original assessment stands.

What citizen's Constitutional rights were violated due to the Patriot Act?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Really? Because the Patriot Act didn't exactly shore it up, now did it bunky? And it was with the GOP spearhead and the panicky acquiesence of the Dems....with BOTH sides admitting they didn't even read most of the damned thing.

And then there were these gems from the Shrub's legal eagle Gonzales (before he was kicked to the curb):

"The Constitution does not say that every citizen has the right to habeas corpus."

"The Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it is"

Those are just samples showing that once again, you just don't know what the hell you're talking about. My original assessment stands.

What citizen's Constitutional rights were violated due to the Patriot Act?

Haebeus Corpus, you willfully ignorant neocon parrot. You've been taught this time and again...stop pretending otherwise. Nothing I stated you can refute....and I noted how you avoided acknowledging the horrors of Gonzales, statements. Grow up. (and since Cheney is a neocon, you're impending anti-semetic BS won't fly).
 
Haebeus Corpus, you willfully ignorant neocon parrot. You've been taught this time and again...stop pretending otherwise. Nothing I stated you can refute....and I noted how you avoided acknowledging the horrors of Gonzales, statements. Grow up. (and since Cheney is a neocon, you're impending anti-semetic BS won't fly).

Again, which citizen?
 
I couldn't agree more SM... Then again, Dixie's posts have always beat the ever lovin' pants off these peons.

I love how when a rightwinger says something so dumb no one wants to acknowledge it they take it as victory.

Then again, it's rare for a rightwinger to ever saying anything of any intellectual merit whatsoever.
 
Yours is more curly than mine.

Oh, such a scathing retort, I am doth slain by your rapier wit!

(this is sarcasm, by the way)

You can't refute what I put to Dixie's ramblings or asshat. Dodge all you want, you've got nothing new to add but the same old neocon parrot squawkings.
 
Oh, such a scathing retort, I am doth slain by your rapier wit!

(this is sarcasm, by the way)

You can't refute what I put to Dixie's ramblings or asshat. Dodge all you want, you've got nothing new to add but the same old neocon parrot squawkings.

LMFAO? What you put to Dixie's ramblings? What exactly was that? Because all I saw you post in response to my well-articulated thread, was the typical left-wing slanderous rhetoric you people try to put forth on everything. Then you have the fucking nerve to claim someone is "parrot squawking" ...dude, that is ALL you have ever done here!

This is the typical dishonest low-life bullshit we put up with everyday from liberals. Come here and spew a bunch of goddamn outright lies, and hurl shit at the right like a bunch of 7th grade punks, THEN act like you've "refuted" something that was said two pages before. It's absolutely amazing to me! Do you people even believe your own overblown egotistical bullshit?
 
Do your own homework and stop being a willfully ignorant neocon parrot. Start with Mr. Mayfield on google.

We've done this dance before, and no matter how many times you try to change history and fact, you'll fail.
You made the accusation, so its your responsibility to back it up.

Again, which citizen had his rights violated by the Patriot Act, under Bush?
 
Oh, such a scathing retort, I am doth slain by your rapier wit!

(this is sarcasm, by the way)

You can't refute what I put to Dixie's ramblings or asshat. Dodge all you want, you've got nothing new to add but the same old neocon parrot squawkings.

"neocon parrot squawkings"
"neocon parrot squawkings"
"neocon parrot squawkings"
"neocon parrot squawkings"

:facepalm:
 
No stupid, it's not. Grow up and deal with the facts....the "conservatism" of Nixon, Reagan and the Bush family is NOT conducive to the principles and guidelines of what the Constitution stands for. Hell, even Ashcroft realized that when Gonzales was trying to get that signature in his hospital room.

But liberals hate the constitution most. They can't even come to grips with the bill of rights.
 
Back
Top