Founders And The General Welfare

Let's put your theory to the test.

Why don't you make a case to the Supreme Court that Social Security, Medicare, and NASA are unconstitutional and should thus be immediately abolished.

It's not a "theory" you ignorant dolt. But I am amused that you think it is easy to take the "goodies" away from the ignorant masses once they get them.

This is why the dishonest dimwit Pelosi argued that they needed to pass Obamacare before they knew what was in the bill. They knew that once they gave ignorant dolts free healthcare, it would be very difficult to take it away.

Only idiots think the clause "general welfare" translates to turning its citizens into dependent wards of the State. It is unsustainable which has been proven time and time again over the history of man. Liberals are still too ignorant to learn from it or comprehend the obvious.
 
Only idiots think the clause "general welfare" translates to turning its citizens into dependent wards of the State. It is unsustainable which has been proven time and time again over the history of man. Liberals are still too ignorant to learn from it or comprehend the obvious.

Only idiots think "general welfare" means welfare. Apparently, you do. No surprise.

On a roll again today, I see, cunt flap. Already three groans. Pull the piano leg out of your anus and the groans may stop
 
Fuck you and your absurd Marx claim. The predictable fallback by RW morons.

Our rights are nothing more than a result of legislative action at the founding. There was nothing "pre-existing" about them. Nor are they universal. They were submitted for ratification. Some made it, some didn't. Are those that didn't pass muster equally as "pre-existent"? Of course not.

Your hero, Scalia, even recognized that your precious Second has its limitations and that does not mean that government has overstepped its authority. Who are you to deem when they do or when they don't?

The Declaration has lovely language and was a great document. But the notion that all men are created equal and had unalienable rights was a lie when the ink was still wet. And T. Jefferson knew that. He owned propert that were not equal under the law and were deprived of their liberty and pursuit of happiness. By others, their lives, too.

But, keep flailing away at what you THINK I say rather than what I DO say. Very common on this forum.

Dumber is evidence of the massive failure of our educational establishment.
 
Dumber is evidence of the massive failure of our educational establishment.

Your poor home-schooled cum bubble.

Did Mommy skip all subjects except stomping your feet and holding your breath, stalker? In the last couple of weeks, you have probably posted over 100 groans. I know I'm in your head rent free, shit stain, but what do you have inserted up your rectum for you to groan so much?
 
Only idiots think "general welfare" means welfare. Apparently, you do. No surprise.

On a roll again today, I see, cunt flap. Already three groans. Pull the piano leg out of your anus and the groans may stop

Dear repugnant dumbfuck; you're the one claiming it means welfare. You're beyond mere regard. Dunce.

Here's your hat you were missing:

Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg
 
Your poor home-schooled cum bubble.

Did Mommy skip all subjects except stomping your feet and holding your breath, stalker? In the last couple of weeks, you have probably posted over 100 groans. I know I'm in your head rent free, shit stain, but what do you have inserted up your rectum for you to groan so much?

Cry harder shit-for-brains.

rosickyinjured.jpg
 
You're a fucking idiot, McCarthyist. Nobody is saying what you claim. Your addled mind has twisted posts into something they are not.

Empty the drool cup and the bed pan, fool. Go back to bed.

Actually you are. Every leftist uses the "general welfare" clause as a means to advance their collectivist goals
 
Back
Top