Fourth manufactured Democrat hoax unanimousy obliterated by appeals court

[artichoke]

Trump lies about everything. He expects the same from his sycophants.

You're still misspelling Obama.

You are totally devoid of facts, as always.

Says the guy always posting zero facts, to the guy always posting independently verifiable LEFT-WING SOURCES confirming the claims being made.

Where does your link about FOIA requests say anything about college records?

You appear to have taken your annual day off from humiliating and discrediting yourself with blatantly stupid partisan misinformation and hysteria...to finally make ONE correct statement about ONE irrelevant fact. Congratulations. You found a typo.

The link added was a DIFFERENT example of the self-proclaimed "most transparent president in history" taking unprecedented extreme measures to conceal and hide information about himself and his administration. It happens when you post a lot of facts and evidence (you should try posting any, ever). The links proving that Obama is hiding his college transcripts are this one and this one. So again, the claim is demonstrably accurate and verified, contrary to your provably false smears.

But you did find that typo.

Your delusions are not facts and evidence. All you've got is disinformation and ad hominems.

Says the person who constantly responds to facts and evidence with nothing but delusional disinformation and ad hominems.

 

[midcan5]

Thank you Arminius, you are the reason our work continues and the kids eat well.


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?118220-Russian-Troll-Talks&p=3498008#post3498008


'A Right-Wing, Populist Critique of President Trump'

https://fakenous.net/?p=1316

 

[artichoke]

Thank you Arminius, you are the reason our work continues and the kids eat well.


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?118220-Russian-Troll-Talks&p=3498008#post3498008


'A Right-Wing, Populist Critique of President Trump'

https://fakenous.net/?p=1316

Incoherent blather.

 

[rjhenn]

You're still misspelling Obama.



Says the guy always posting zero facts, to the guy always posting independently verifiable LEFT-WING SOURCES confirming the claims being made. [emoji38]up:



You appear to have taken your annual day off from humiliating and discrediting yourself with blatantly stupid partisan misinformation and hysteria...to finally make ONE correct statement about ONE irrelevant fact. Congratulations. You found a typo.

The link added was a DIFFERENT example of the self-proclaimed "most transparent president in history" taking unprecedented extreme measures to conceal and hide information about himself and his administration. It happens when you post a lot of facts and evidence (you should try posting any, ever). The links proving that Obama is hiding his college transcripts are this one and this one. So again, the claim is demonstrably accurate and verified, contrary to your provably false smears.

But you did find that typo. [emoji23]

Says the person who constantly responds to facts and evidence with nothing but delusional disinformation and ad hominems.

Again, you don't deal in facts and evidence. None of your links support your allegation that Obama took extraordinary measures to hide his college transcripts. OTOH, where are Trump's college transcripts and his tax returns? It's obvious that he's hiding something!. Your obsession with Obama, who isn't the President anymore, combined with your derangement about Trump, won't allow you to even consider that.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Incoherent blather.

The usual projection.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[artichoke]

Again, you don't deal in facts and evidence.

Says the person who posts nothing but empty attitude and posturing, to the person who CONSTANTLY backs up their claims with facts and evidence.

None of your links support your allegation that Obama took extraordinary measures to hide his college transcripts.

You: Trump must be hiding something for not helping Democrats smear, persecute, and destroy everyone who ever did business with him by releasing his tax returns.

Me: Obama is STILL refusing to release his college records. So by your logic, that MUST mean that he has something to hide, right?

You: Obama doesn't count because he didn't fight HARDER to hide the evidence.

Your obsession with Obama

Wrong again. Pointing out your hypocrisy and double standards REQUIRES bringing up Obama. That's not me obsessing over Obama...it's YOU obsessing over smearing Trump and me correcting your dishonest partisan propaganda.



Try again, dishonest demagogue.

The usual projection.

Yes, pointing out Midcan's random incoherent nonsense that has literally nothing to do with what is being discussed is clearly "projection." Your empty knee-jerk compulsion to deflect and project here doesn't even make sense at this point.

 

[LV426]

epeating the stupid claim won't make it less stupid. Deep blue states taking a momentary break from voting for the left doesn't magically transform them into red states. They will still vote with Democrats in almost every situation, even if you don't want that to be true for your current false narrative.

If a state votes for the Republican, then it is a red state. The end.

 

[LV426]

The economic records he has broken are many, and a matter of fact at this point.

1. Trump has yet to top Obama's best quarterly (5.5% in Q2 2014) and annual GDP growth (2.88% in 2015).

2. Since the start of the Russia Tax Cut on 1/2/18, the DJIA has grown by less than 3% over 26 months.

3. In Trump's first 37 months, he's created 6.6M jobs; however, Obama created 8.2M jobs over his last 37 months. Is 6.6M > or < 8.2M?

4. Trump's tax cuts reduced revenue by 1.3% from 2017 to 2019, and has increased the debt by $4.8T in just three years. By contrast, Obama added $8.6T in debt over 8 years.

Trump does hold the record for largest farm bailout, though...$30B of taxpayer cash spent to buy the votes of deadbeat farmer trash that won't pay a single cent of that bailout back.

Trump also holds the top 10 largest gross DJIA drops of all time.

Trump also holds the record for largest trade deficit of all time.

Trump also has added more debt in his first three years than any President since, even Obama.

Trump doesn't even have the lowest unemployment rate on record.

I notice you didn't list a single one of these "records". It's pretty obvious why.

 

[LV426]

So A LOT of blue state Democrats showed up to vote against Drumpf. And?

So there are more Democrats than Republicans in this country.

A lot more.

 

[LV426]

We talk about triggered, TDS-suffering Democrat snowflakes screaming at the sky in their little vagina hats all the time on here. This is not news. Virtually every election that went the left's way was ALREADY SUPPOSED to go their way, by virtue of being a blue state AND being a mid-term election. You easily-manipulated pawns parroting desperate spoon-fed propaganda about a "blue wave" is straight-up comical.

But why is it supposed to go Democrats way if Trump has done such a wonderful, outstanding job with the country?

Wouldn't voters reward him for that?

They didn't.

So, he hasn't done such a wonderful, outstanding job with the country.

 

[LV426]

Of course. Using your own logic, if Drumpf were the cartoonishly unrealistic Disney villain you childish demagogues endlessly smear him as being, wouldn't the results have been better than Democrats only gaining 40 seats out of 435, almost entirely in districts that "had given a majority or a plurality of their vote to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election," with "Republicans [defending] the vast majority of their rural seats" (see here), WITH Republicans having an unusually wildly disproportionate amount of retirements hindering them, and WITH rampant Democrat cheating?

Well, its disingenuous to measure the performance by the total gross number of seats won because of GOP gerrymandering in the 2010's.

That's why we are looking at aggregate vote totals.

There hasn't been an aggregate vote total margin as large as the one in 2018 since 1974.

Why do you think that is? Why do you think the GOP and Trump lost the total aggregate House vote by the largest margin in 44 years?

 

[LV426]

Says the person peddling hilarious cheer-leading propaganda about a blue wave that takes literally five minutes on Wikipedia to debunk.

But you didn't debunk anything. You tried to lie and pretend that House seats flipping isn't that big a deal, except that it is a big deal because it made Pelosi speaker and was the largest total aggregate House vote margin in 44 years.

You also have yet to tout any of these economic "records" that are supposedly so wonderful ,they guarantee a Trump re-election even though the GOP lost control of the House 16 months ago while Trump was doing this miraculous job you say he did.

If Trump did such a great job, why didn't voters reward him by expanding the GOP majority in the House?

The only answer is that he didn't do a great job.

 

[LV426]

Assuming facts not evidence. That's not the conduct of someone who is concerned with the truth. That's the conduct of an angry, triggered snowflake trying to lash out.

Wow, you're quite the crybaby.

I'd like to know what class you took that said as a matter of default, the incumbent President would lose control of one of the chambers in Congress, despite unmentioned economic "miracles" that simultaneously guarantee a Trump re-election?

 

[LV426]

And not caring about your irrelevant fact in no way indicates lack of Poli Sci experience. It just indicates that you're the only one here too stupid to tell the difference between a lot of blue state Democrats showing up to "resist" Drumpf at the ballot box in 2018 (hence, a strong showing among those who were already going to vote anti-Drumpf) and this imaginary "blue wave" you desperate propagandists cling to like a pacifier to console yourselves.

So why would the Democrats show up to resist, but the Republicans wouldn't show up to support?

You made this claim that Trump has done wonderful things with the country, so why did all his voters and supporters abandon him?

Where did they all go?

Were they ever really there to begin with?

So you say all these Democrats showed up, but then you also say that wasn't a blue wave?

So that's cognitive dissonance.

Your strategy on these boards seems to spew vitriol without any real facts to support yourself, and you do it in such a juvenile and arrogant way so that you never have to answer for any of it.

What a fucking loser.

 

[LV426]

Says the guy who thinks high voter turnout in already blue states constitutes a "blue wave."

But you have been screeching that Trump has done such a wonderful job...so if he did such a wonderful job, why didn't his people come out to support him in 2018 or 2019, for that matter?

And are you sure of this claim? Because turnout was up *everywhere* in 2018, and that is easily researched.

 

[LV426]

You're probably just hyperventilating like a gullible moron again over deliberately dishonest spoon-fed propaganda, like Democrats did when Drumpf said he can do whatever he wants with political appointees and Democrats blatantly misinformed the mindless herd (you) to manipulate them into thinking what he said was that he can do whatever he wants...about anything, instead of what he actually said.

So, this is a long, rambling, rant of a post that ultimately says nothing.

Calm down and organize your thoughts.

 

[LV426]

Manafort tried to establish ties with foreign governments as part of his job

Ah, but Trump said "no one from my campaign had any contact with Russia."

So that's a lie.

And what do state polling numbers have to do with establishing ties to foreign governments?

 

[LV426]

Manafort tried to establish ties with foreign governments as part of his job, as every transition team does, and no one would take him seriously, citing garbage propaganda from the NY Times showing that Hillary had a 92% chance of winning, based on polling that deliberately wildly oversampled Democrat voters to manufacture those results. He provided publicly available polling data to them to show that when the polls weren't blatantly rigged by lying media hacks, Drumpf actually had a really good chance of winning. There is nothing criminal or even controversial about these actions.

Polling has what to do with establishing ties with foreign governments?

You all said Trump's campaign had no contact with Russia. So that was a lie, then. So since they lied about contact with Russia, why wouldn't they be lying about anything else?

Also, what does polling data from a handful of states have to do with anything?

 

[rjhenn]

Says the person who posts nothing but empty attitude and posturing, to the person who CONSTANTLY backs up their claims with facts and evidence.

You: Trump must be hiding something for not helping Democrats smear, persecute, and destroy everyone who ever did business with him by releasing his tax returns.

Me: Obama is STILL refusing to release his college records. So by your logic, that MUST mean that he has something to hide, right?

You: Obama doesn't count because he didn't fight HARDER to hide the evidence.

Wrong again. Pointing out your hypocrisy and double standards REQUIRES bringing up Obama. That's not me obsessing over Obama...it's YOU obsessing over smearing Trump and me correcting your dishonest partisan propaganda.



Try again, dishonest demagogue.

Yes, pointing out Midcan's random incoherent nonsense that has literally nothing to do with what is being discussed is clearly "projection." Your empty knee-jerk compulsion to deflect and project here doesn't even make sense at this point.

[emoji23]

You don't deal in facts and evidence. What you call facts and evidence is just fake news and alternative facts, generated by the right-wing lie machine. All you've got is propaganda.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[artichoke]

If a state votes for the Republican, then it is a red state. The end.

If it votes Democrat 99% of the time and Republican 1% of the time, it's a blue state. See, I can repeat myself too.

1. Trump has yet to top Obama's best quarterly (5.5% in Q2 2014) and annual GDP growth (2.88% in 2015).

This is a cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy (two things happening at once must mean that one CAUSED the other). Did the economy surviving Obama's policies well enough to perform strongly for one brief moment make that the result of Obama's policies? And which Obama policy exactly would logically create jobs rather than killing them? Doubling and tripling everyone's health care costs? How exactly does that work? And does this one moment undo all the records Trump has broken in REVIVING the economy from the shambles it was in when he inherited it?

2. Since the start of the Russia Tax Cut...

AAAnd we're back into self-discrediting paranoid conspiracy theory fantasies again. This is how you get the rest of your laughably stupid propaganda ignored.

So there are more Democrats than Republicans in this country.

A lot more.

...who showed up during Election 2018, sure. Lame spin.

As for your childish editing of the word "Trump" to "Drumpf"...

View attachment 14426

-Democrats support government-run everything.——Nazis support government-run everything.——President Trump stands for free markets, limited government.

-Democrats support gun confiscation.——Nazis support gun confiscation.——President Trump stands for armed, free citizens.

-Democrats support abortion.——Nazis support abortion.——President Trump is anti-abortion.

-Democrats support censorship.——Nazis support censorship.——President Trump stands for free speech.

-Democrats support nanny state handouts.——Nazis support nanny state handouts.——President Trump stands for self-reliance.

-Democrats support racist preferential treatment.——Nazis support racist preferential treatment.——President Trump stands for actual equality.

-Democrats support taxpayer-funded indoctrination.——Nazis support taxpayer-funded indoctrination.——President Trump stands for school choice, actual education.

-Democrats support illegal, unprovoked wars.——Nazis support illegal, unprovoked wars.——President Trump stands for historic progress toward peace, as with Korea.

-Democrats support no freedom of religion.——Nazis support no freedom of religion.——President Trump stands for free religious exercise.

-Democrats support rigged news media.——Nazis support rigged news media.——President Trump stands for freedom of the press.

-Democrats support propagandized entertainment.——Nazis support propagandized entertainment.——President Trump stands for agenda-free entertainment.

-Democrats support a rigged justice system.——Nazis support a rigged justice system.——President Trump stands for equal protection under the law.

-Democrats support persecution of dissent.——Nazis support persecution of dissent.——President Trump stands for vigorous, open debate.

-Democrats support violent mob rule.——Nazis support violent mob rule.——President Trump stands for the rule of law.

-Democrats support employment quotas, guarantees.——Nazis support employment quotas, guarantees.——President Trump stands for merit-based employment.

-Democrats support redistribution of wealth.——Nazis support redistribution of wealth.——President Trump stands for 'You keep what you earn.'

-Democrats support taking over corporations.——Nazis support taking over corporations.——President Trump stands for protecting property rights.

-Democrats support mandatory profit-sharing.——Nazis support mandatory profit-sharing.——President Trump stands for running your own business.

-Democrats support government pensions for all.——Nazis support government pensions for all.——President Trump stands for self-reliance, 401k.

But why is it supposed to go Democrats way if Trump has done such a wonderful, outstanding job with the country?

Wouldn't voters reward him for that?

You mean the same Democrats openly rooting for disasters to wreck the country to inflict partisan harm on Trump? If their DOZENS of debunked hoaxes weren't already proof enough, their record of wishing catastrophe on this country should clue you into the fact that Democrats are not concerned with truth and give ZERO fucks about what happens to this country they despise.

Not exactly rocket science there, Socrates.

Well, its disingenuous to measure the performance by the total gross number of seats won because of GOP gerrymandering in the 2010's.

Ah, so when Democrats fail and lose, THAT'S the result of gerrymandering (which both sides do all the time), but when Democrats win what should be effortless blue state elections, THAT'S a "blue wave."

Thanks for filling me in on who's being "disingenuous" here.

Why do you think the GOP and Trump lost the total aggregate House vote by the largest margin in 44 years?

Um, for the reasons already stated...that it's a midterm election, there were a ton of Republican retirements, and a ton of the underwhelming Democrat gains were in blue states filled with triggered snowflake crybullies dying to scream at ballot boxes instead of the sky in their little vagina hats.

But you didn't debunk anything. You tried to lie and pretend that House seats flipping isn't that big a deal, except that it is a big deal because it made Pelosi speaker

Almost EVERY midterm election makes the minority party speaker. That's the OPPOSITE of a "big deal." It's literally ROUTINE, by definition.

WHO is trying to lie and pretend away the facts here?

You also have yet to tout any of these economic "records" that are supposedly so wonderful

Unless you count post 159.

they guarantee a Trump re-election even though the GOP lost control of the House 16 months ago while Trump was doing this miraculous job you say he did.

During a midterm, in blue states, sure.

And again, Trump Derangement Syndrome + hating this country = Democrats continuing to crucify Trump no matter WHAT number of economic records he breaks. Duh.

If Trump did such a great job, why didn't voters reward him by expanding the GOP majority in the House?

For the same reason as last time you asked (did someone forget their meds again?). Democrats beg for catastrophes to annihilate this country because they hate Trump so much. No amount of success would translate into Democrats voting for Trump en masse. Comprehend it this time, or shall I break out the crayons?

The only answer is that he didn't do a great job.

Unless you count all the record-breaking economic achievements and unprecedented policy successes, sure.

Wow, you're quite the crybaby.

Yes, laughing at someone for aimlessly lashing out with baseless ad hominem fallacies makes ME the crybaby. Seriously, lay down the crack pipe.

So why would the Democrats show up to resist, but the Republicans wouldn't show up to support?

For the same reason that EVERY midterm election goes that way. People only care about the presidential race, except for those who are angry at the president (Ii's especially pronounced in the GOP, where the party is made up of establishment liberals and Trump is literally one of the only conservative things in the country to vote for). Obviously, that's why the midterms almost always put the minority party in power. Again, Poli Sci 101 could help you with your fundamental ignorance of how our political system works.

So you say all these Democrats showed up, but then you also say that wasn't a blue wave?

Yes.

Many more Democrats showed up because it was a midterm under a Republican president (particularly one they lose their minds hyperventilating over) and won some easy blue state battles. That's not a blue wave, it's called a "midterm election." Duh.

So that's cognitive dissonance.

Yes, you failing to comprehend basic introductory politics is someone else having cognitive dissonance.

Devastating counterpoint there, Socrates.

Your strategy on these boards seems to spew vitriol without any real facts to support yourself, and you do it in such a juvenile and arrogant way so that you never have to answer for any of it.

Says the person spewing paranoid conspiracy theories, Neanderthal fallacies, and changing Trump's name to Drumpf while providing no relevant facts or evidence.

So, this is a long, rambling, rant of a post that ultimately says nothing.

That's clearly what you need to believe. Who are you trying to convince, me or you?

Too bad the reality is that you've humiliated yourself with comically stupid arguments that have all been thrown back in your face and laughed off the thread.

Calm down and organize your thoughts.

They ARE organized and in plain English. Calm down and work on your reading comprehension issues.

I've apparently touched a nerve. Twelve butthurt posts hysterically lashing out at simple, straightforward corrections to blatantly stupid and childish tantrums, fallacies, and delusions.

Ah, but Trump said "no one from my campaign had any contact with Russia."

So that's a lie.

No, it's you being a laughably inept moron. Every campaign establishes ties with every foreign government at length before the election. OBVIOUSLY he was not saying no one in his campaign ever talked to any Russian. You are incredibly dumb.

Polling has what to do with establishing ties with foreign governments?

Again with the reading comprehension issues. Already asked and answered. Learn how to read, look back to the first time this was all spelled out...if you're able.