Fourth manufactured Democrat hoax unanimousy obliterated by appeals court

So, as we were saying, FOUR Democrat hoaxes down now. How many more will they try before (if ever) learning to accept elections and reality like thinking, reasonable results?
 
You won't answer the question because you know I can present evidence for anything you say isn't true about what I said.

You have never backed up anything you bloviate with credible facts. You still think the Russians got Trump elected. How fucking dense is that? :laugh:
 
Once again, what did I say that you think is wrong? I will provide evidence.
Are you denying that Trump accepted Russia's offer of help?

Asked and answered. You falsely claimed that you debunked the list. When called out as a liar and challenged for links and quotes, you played a bunch of diversionary kid's games like this one, admitted that you only even ATTEMPTED to debunk a tiny fraction of the list (before getting your ass handed to you on those three), and repeatedly refused to produce the evidence.

Once again, you have proven in front of everyone to be a lying phony. Deal with it or provide the proof.

View attachment 14244
 
Asked and answered. You falsely claimed that you debunked the list. When called out as a liar and challenged for links and quotes, you played a bunch of diversionary kid's games like this one, admitted that you only even ATTEMPTED to debunk a tiny fraction of the list (before getting your ass handed to you on those three), and repeatedly refused to produce the evidence.

Once again, you have proven in front of everyone to be a lying phony. Deal with it or provide the proof.

View attachment 14244

Alright, so you won't name anything because you know everything I said is correct.
 
Alright, so you won't name anything because you know everything I said is correct.

Pretending that I am avoiding a challenge to continue avoiding the challenge that started all this. Cheap, sleazy, and dishonest...and people can read, so they can see through this stupid ploy. Again, you falsely claimed that you debunked the list. When called out as a liar and challenged for links and quotes, you admitted that you only even ATTEMPTED to debunk a tiny fraction of the list (before getting your ass handed to you on those three), and repeatedly refused to produce the evidence that any claims but your own were debunked.

THAT'S what we're waiting on here. Introduce all the diversionary challenges you want (red herring fallacy). YOU are the only one avoiding the debate here. :bs:

Please stop lying and either accept another embarrassing defeat or produce the evidence.

View attachment 14263
 
Step 1: Falsely accuse your victim of everything under the Sun, hoping that something will stick.

Step 2: When wave-after-wave of your McCarthyite witch hunts, coup attempts, and hoaxes all fall apart under serious scrutiny, respond by inventing more conspiracy theories.

View attachment 14194
You appear to be talking about the GOP's stance towards Hillary.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Right. It being a blatantly staged fraud is what makes it a hoax. Hence it being called a hoax. Try to keep up.

200.webp
Nothing fraudulent about it, though a lawsuit is not the proper way to do it. Trump should be impeached again for his emoluments violations, though we know that the GOP Senate will never convict Trump, no matter how obvious his crimes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Right. The party that illegally sold foreign governments influence over U.S. policy through the Clinton Foundation, the party of the Biden crime family with all it's foreign bribery, kick backs, nepotism, and blatantly corrupt abuses of power...launched YET ANOTHER BS McCarthyite witch hunt based on blatantly constitutionally-illiterate nonsense just because he runs an international business...and the court rejected not only the notion that they had standing, but that this was even controversial in the first place...but sure, they "made no decision on the merit."

From the article:

“The Constitution permits the Judiciary to speak only in the context of an Article III case or controversy and this lawsuit presents neither.”

Whatever you gotta tell yourself. [emoji23]
And you talk about Democrat hoaxes, when you are deep in GOP hoaxes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
First, they staged the Russia hoax. Then they tried the "obstruction" hoax. Then they tried the Ukraine hoax. All fell apart under scrutiny. Now, an appeals court has abruptly ended the left's OTHER non-stop Constitution-shredding abuse of power with extreme prejudice...the frivolous, endless nonsense about the emoluments clause.

"A federal appeals court on Friday unanimously ruled that more than 200 Democratic congressional lawmakers do not have standing to sue President Trump over allegations he violated the Emoluments Clause over foreign payments to his businesses. “Because we conclude that the Members lack standing, we reverse the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss their complaint,” the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in its ruling."

Appeals court hands Trump win, rules Dem lawmakers cannot sue over business payments

Democrats are reportedly one step away from eating a bottle of pills.

200.gif


View attachment 14150
Some nut just posted that Trump should be impeached on a case that was just dismissed by a Federal Appeals Court.
 
I would have stopped warning that "the walls are closing in" on Trump about four or five humiliations ago. :rofl2:
The walls are not closing in simply because the GOP is corrupt and is determined to coverup Trump's guilt.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
It warms my heart to watch the Constitution-shredding oath-breakers, lawless tyrants, and traitors of the left cry, lose, and get destroyed at every turn.

200.webp


:3d:

You mean it warms your heart to watch the Constitution-shredding oath-breakers, lawless tyrants, and traitors of the right lie, cheat and steal in order to protect their power.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top