"Fox News has always been partisan. But has it become propaganda?"

Not at all, being "hostile to the President," which has always been the role of the media, would never justify FOX becoming State TV, as I noted, partisanship and propaganda are two different things

The left wing media was anything but hostile to Obama. In fact, they were so friendly to him, it caused you to move further back in kiss Obama's black asshole line. Pucker up.
 
Anymore questions?.....LOL

unnamed.jpg

Why did you support the left wing media kissing Obama's ass? All it did was move you further back in the line.
 
Not at all, being "hostile to the President," which has always been the role of the media, would never justify FOX becoming State TV, as I noted, partisanship and propaganda are two different things
then the answer to your question is no.......Fox is partisan......as are CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, and NBC........it isn't propaganda.....

if you're looking for that ask yourself where you can find all the fake news?........
 
Not at all, being "hostile to the President," which has always been the role of the media, would never justify FOX becoming State TV, as I noted, partisanship and propaganda are two different things

"being hostile to he president, which has always been the role of the media"?

what an asinine thing to say,
and exactly, precisely why your side is in the $hitter, gone from power, the enemy of the sate

enjoy
 
"Hannity was treated in Texas like a member of the Administration because he virtually is one. Fox has long been a bane of liberals, but in the past two years many people who watch the network closely, including some Fox alumni, say that it has evolved into something that hasn’t existed before in the United States, it's the closest we’ve come to having state TV.”

"Fox acts as a force multiplier for Trump, solidifying his hold over the Republican Party and intensifying his support. For both Trump and Fox, fear is a business strategy—it keeps people watching.”

"The White House and Fox interact so seamlessly that it can be hard to determine, during a particular news cycle, which one is following the other’s lead. Sarah Sanders, has largely stopped holding press conferences, but she has made some thirty appearances on such shows as “Fox & Friends” and “Hannity."

"It’s as if the President had his own press organization. It’s simply a mouthpiece for the President, repeating what the President says, no matter how false or contradictory. The feedback loop is so strong that Trump will even pick up an error made by Fox,”

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house?currentPage=all

Lot of strange coincidences there;

What other news source covered all of Trump rallies, beginning to end, 2016 and 2018?

What other news source has set all kinds of records interviewing the sitting President forty two times in just his first two years?

How many other politicians had major new sources' figures comparable to Hannity and Pirro's role on FOX share the same campaign stage and podium as Trump has had in the past?

What other news source has experienced such as FOX did with Shine leaving FOX to go to the White House and shortly thereafter Hope Hicks appointed as senior executive in charge of communications at FOX?

What other news source has programs that Trump calls in during live broadcasts to offer his opinions?

And what Administration ever can come close to duplicating the revolving door between the Administration and FOX employees plus "regular contributors" to come close to the likes of Nagert, Keane, Bolton, Carson, Schlapp, Mosbacher, Grenell, Syaegh, McEntee, Grenell, Shine, McFarland, etc..

Seemingly Fox has gone beyond just being partisan as other news sources have, but you got to give them credit for one thing, least they had the dignity to confess up and dump the "fair and balanced" bullshit

It doesn't even TRY anymore. A recyling of trash. WH to FOX, FOX to WH. Spin, rinse, repeat.
 
Back
Top