Fred Thompson's Trophy Wife: A Deadbeat

I thought Libby was going to be a Senator, I believe she was running at that time, wasn't she?

Anyway, the only thing I had against Hillary was I thought her universal health care plan was a terrible boondoggle that would have cost more than we got for our trouble.

Face it, they make a good team.


Maybe I'm wrong; I'm too lazy to go back through the thread: but I thought you implied that Hillary was a legitimate target for criticism that was above and beyond what other First Ladies got, because she sold herself as her husband's partner - 2 for 1?
 
Maybe I'm wrong; I'm too lazy to go back through the thread: but I thought you implied that Hillary was a legitimate target for criticism that was above and beyond what other First Ladies got, because she sold herself as her husband's partner - 2 for 1?

I took it that way, though it was Cawacko who started it I think. I don't care enough to go back and look, I figure, I'll just throw out accusations, and the one who squeals is the one you hit. I have to work you know.
 
Maybe I'm wrong; I'm too lazy to go back through the thread: but I thought you implied that Hillary was a legitimate target for criticism that was above and beyond what other First Ladies got, because she sold herself as her husband's partner - 2 for 1?
And that is something about her looks?

All I am saying is that perception makes a difference in coverage. As I said, because of her savvy it is doubtful that Fred's wife will make the same type of claim. Just as Arnie didn't, nor did Shriver decide to suggest it during his campaigns. Nor, if you notice, are team HillBilly in this election.

The Press is lazy, if they don't put it right out there they aren't even going to attempt to catch the ring.
 
I took it that way, though it was Cawacko who started it I think. I don't care enough to go back and look, I figure, I'll just throw out accusations, and the one who squeals is the one you hit. I have to work you know.


LOL

Well, you know what I've noticed in the last three or four years?

A huge majority of republicans that I've talked to on message boards, now claim that it wasn't them who was clamouring for impeachement of Clinton - that in fact, they never cared about his sexual philandering.

You were on that other board with me - does this strike you as credible? LOL


Just wait, in another 5 years, the majority of republicans will be claiming that they never supported the iraq war, and fought like hell to get us out of there.
 
LOL

Well, you know what I've noticed in the last three or four years?

A huge majority of republicans that I've talked to on message boards, now claim that it wasn't them who was clamouring for impeachement of Clinton - that in fact, they never cared about his sexual philandering.

You were on that other board with me - does this strike you as credible? LOL


Just wait, in another 5 years, the majority of republicans will be claiming that they never supported the iraq war, and fought like hell to get us out of there.

Oh yeah, you nailed it.
 
LOL

Well, you know what I've noticed in the last three or four years?

A huge majority of republicans that I've talked to on message boards, now claim that it wasn't them who was clamouring for impeachement of Clinton - that in fact, they never cared about his sexual philandering.

You were on that other board with me - does this strike you as credible? LOL


Just wait, in another 5 years, the majority of republicans will be claiming that they never supported the iraq war, and fought like hell to get us out of there.
We spoke of it on p.com when I first started on these things. I know that I thought it was a waste of cash. So, you know what I notice? That often they are truthful when they say that.
 
Damo, I didn't know you in 1998. I'll take your word that you were oppossed to the blowjob impeachment.
 
Damo, I didn't know you in 1998. I'll take your word that you were oppossed to the blowjob impeachment.
It doesn't seem that you will. You say that "Rs now are all saying"...

Regardless, I thought it was a waste of cash and constantly tried to redirect back to illegal donations from International sources, nobody listened. It is one of the reasons that I think that both sides used it as a distraction from far more serious charges that they both would be hit with.
 
It doesn't seem that you will. You say that "Rs now are all saying"...

Regardless, I thought it was a waste of cash and constantly tried to redirect back to illegal donations from International sources, nobody listened. It is one of the reasons that I think that both sides used it as a distraction from far more serious charges that they both would be hit with.

This Cippie seems like a typical, smug lib, with a small head and a big mouth? I was not for the blowjob impeachment either, chubby Monica was kind of cute and we are all men here? I had a chubby girl like that once, butt, I put her on the bike, every morning, and I would play, "Fat bottomed girls" in the background, and sing especially loud when they say "get on your bikes and ride?" so that she would get the hint? Butt, leave it to selfish Bill to feed poor Monica nothing but big macs and the presidential weenie, with relish or without? LOL. Butt, this is not an impeachable offense?
 
It's everything you have said on this thread about both her and Jeri Thompson. I am sick and tired also, of hearing about how "unattractive" hillary Clinton is. She's a 60 year old woman, and doesn't look bad actually. Certainly, Laura Bush looks no better.

There is an ongoing Madonna/Whore complex that is projected out from Republican men, and frankly, also from Republian women, onto national figures. The Democratic women being the whores, or the nags, or the calculating career women, and the Republican women, no matter what their background, or whether or not they have children, are the Madonnas.

It's disgusting.

First of all I agreed on this thread that Hillary's clevage is irrelevent.

I also said that when she was first lady and was placed in charge of Bill's signature issue, health care, you all of a sudden are entering yourself into fray and subject to more fanfare and criticism.
 
It doesn't seem that you will. You say that "Rs now are all saying"...

Regardless, I thought it was a waste of cash and constantly tried to redirect back to illegal donations from International sources, nobody listened. It is one of the reasons that I think that both sides used it as a distraction from far more serious charges that they both would be hit with.

Besides the USC football political board this is the only chat board I go to. I have not seen anyone talk on that site about the Clinton impeachment and I haven't seen anyone here on this board talk about it either.
 
Besides the USC football political board this is the only chat board I go to. I have not seen anyone talk on that site about the Clinton impeachment and I haven't seen anyone here on this board talk about it either.
That's because this board was created long after the Impeachment. In fact it is only a year old.
 
Back
Top