‘Free Crack Pipes’ Myth Rooted in False Free Beacon Report

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
translation: another intellectually impotent MAGA minion who babbles when faced with a fact they can't deny. A pathetic display of MAGA intellectual cowardice
.



That isn't a translation. That's just a childish insult. This is a translation

மற்றொரு அறிவார்ந்த கையாலாகாத மக கூட்டாளி, அவர்கள் மறுக்க முடியாத ஒரு உண்மையை எதிர்கொள்ளும் போது உளறுகிறார். மக அறிவுசார் கோழைத்தனத்தின் பரிதாபகரமான காட்சி.

Babble on, bumpkin. Didn't Daddy teach you that an insult or retort is only of worth if the target can understand it? My previous assessments of your BS stands, and you prove it with each response. Carry on.
 
Dream on, jackass! When I pointed out to your equally intellectually impotent brethren that there is NO MENTION OF CRACK PIPES in the final draft, and that this exaggeration/misleading statement was repeated by the MSM, he had no answer except to call that glaring point "trivial". And now you claim "included and then retracted"...Really? Says who? Proof or just speculation from a generalized unnamed source?

:palm: Stupid MAGA minions.....you'll eat shit and call it ice cream before admitting error on any level....just like the Orange Oaf you worship. Carry on.

Lets see the contracts because this appears to be a lie:

The Associated Press reported that the grant solicitation did not specifically mention the inclusion of pipes for smoking, though such materials can be part of safe smoking kits.

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...utes-reports-of-federal-funds-for-crack-pipes
 
The AP throws in information that was part of the lie/exaggeration circulated throughout the MSM. The Hill's article, like right wing wonks and media noise machines, cannot and does not prove the false statement regarding crack pipes. Period.

I need to see the documents, which I promise mention pipes.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
The AP throws in information that was part of the lie/exaggeration circulated throughout the MSM. The Hill's article, like right wing wonks and media noise machines, cannot and does not prove the false statement regarding crack pipes. Period.


I need to see the documents, which I promise mention pipes.

And when the final print is released to the public, and there is no mention of "pipes", the right wing noise machine will bend over backwards to insinuate "suggestions" where there are none. This is their SOP.
 
Back
Top