You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Free Shit and Trump Hate
- Thread starter Evmetro
- Start date
I can understand your confusion. Someone that has never worked a day in his life like you wouldn't know what it's like to earn anything. You've had it handed to you all your life like the low income, low skilled, freeloaders that think society owes them something. The rest of us would be better off if they'd simply die or kill themselves.
LOL!
If your employer ceased paying for your health care, who would have to pay for it?
The only way they'd stop paying is if I didn't work for them anymore. That means I'd no longer be earning it as part of my compensation.
So you admit you're not paying for it; they are.
And what if they decide to stop paying for it...who picks up the tab in that scenario?
Funny how you bleeding hearts use the word "if" a lot. If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass when he jumped. If a food stamp leech would actually provide skills worthy of a higher wage, the rest of us wouldn't be buying the food for him/her.
Look, you made a claim that was untrue. Then you stupidly proved how untrue it was by committing an unforced error. So now we're back to square one with you having someone else pay for your health care. If they stopped paying for your health care, which they could decide to do at any time, you'd have to pick up the tab for yourself.
So you don't pay for your health care now, while you argue against Medicare for all.
What a fucking fraud.
Well, what you have seems to change depending on how your argument is faring at any given moment.
But the constant is that you're not paying for your health care; your employer is. If your employed ceased paying for it, who would pay it? You.
We already had this debate in 2012 and you lost. It went all the way to SCOTUS. So at this point, this argument of yours is a false one that you're clinging to while ignoring the truth and reality.
There you go using that "IF" again.
The SCOTUS decision was based on the government's ability to tax. What's sad about that is your BOY Obama had said that the mandate was not a tax increase. Where was Obama saying that was wrong and you decided it on something I claimed it wasn't. In other words, it was a tax increase, the BOY knew it, and lied about something else. What's worse is all his supporters puckered up to his asshole covering for him.
Look, you made a claim that was untrue. Then you stupidly proved how untrue it was by committing an unforced error. So now we're back to square one with you having someone else pay for your health care. If they stopped paying for your health care, which they could decide to do at any time, you'd have to pick up the tab for yourself.
So you don't pay for your health care now, while you argue against Medicare for all.
What a fucking fraud.
There you go with that IF again, boy.
There you go using that "IF" again.
So you don't think there's a possibility your employer could just decide that it costs too much to provide you with health care, so they'll stop paying for it?
So you admit you're not paying for it; they are.
And what if they decide to stop paying for it...who picks up the tab in that scenario?
That's what you saying. I've explained it. If you're too goddamn stupid to understand something that simple, you never will.
So you don't think there's a possibility your employer could just decide that it costs too much to provide you with health care, so they'll stop paying for it?
Absolutely not. If you're basing it on you thinking you know more about my situation that I do, that only makes you look foolish.
The SCOTUS decision was based on the government's ability to tax. What's sad about that is your BOY Obama had said that the mandate was not a tax increase. Where was Obama saying that was wrong and you decided it on something I claimed it wasn't. In other words, it was a tax increase, the BOY knew it, and lied about something else. What's worse is all his supporters puckered up to his asshole covering for him.
Why are you re-litigating a fight you've already lost?
SCOTUS settled this issue. The mandate was just one of the challenges to the law's Constitutionality. On the question as to whether or not it's Constitutional, SCOTUS ruled it was.
But none of this gets to the truth of the matter; someone else pays for your health care now, and if they didn't, you'd have to pay for it.
There you go with that IF again, boy.
The IF proves that you're not paying for your health care.
IF your employer decided to stop paying for your care, which they could do at any time, who would pick up the tab for your health care?
You're the one alleging there are people who don't work and who get benefits...I've asked you twice to show some proof of that claim, even the # of people you claim do this, and you can't.
The reason is obvious; you're a lying piece of shit.
Are you claiming everyone is employed and no one gets social welfare? I've asked you to show proof that everyone is and no one gets benefits.
The reason you can't is obvious. It's a fact you're a piece of shit socialist that has never worked a day in his miserable life and wants people like me to pay more taxes so you can continue to be a drain on society.
That's what you saying. I've explained it. If you're too goddamn stupid to understand something that simple, you never will.
No, you explained that someone else is paying for your care quite clearly.
If they stopped paying for it, who would pick up the tab?
BTW - they could decide at any time to cease paying for your health care. IF THAT HAPPENED, who would end up paying for your health care?
Why are you re-litigating a fight you've already lost?
SCOTUS settled this issue. The mandate was just one of the challenges to the law's Constitutionality. On the question as to whether or not it's Constitutional, SCOTUS ruled it was.
But none of this gets to the truth of the matter; someone else pays for your health care now, and if they didn't, you'd have to pay for it.
They ruled on whether it was or wasn't a tax. Your coon said it wasn't, they said the mandate was OK because of the ability to tax, and that piece of shit said nothing.
There you go with the IF again.
Absolutely not.
What a fucking idiot.
Businesses cut coverage for their workers all the time.
If you're basing it on you thinking you know more about my situation that I do, that only makes you look foolish.
Well, your "situation" seems pretty inconsistent and is hard to be believed. That's what happens when you change your story as many times as you have.
Are you claiming everyone is employed and no one gets social welfare?
No, of course not. Because there are disabled people, retirees, veterans, and children.
No, you explained that someone else is paying for your care quite clearly.
If they stopped paying for it, who would pick up the tab?
BTW - they could decide at any time to cease paying for your health care. IF THAT HAPPENED, who would end up paying for your health care?
I work on reality. Socialist pieces of shit like you work on hypotheticals.
I've asked you to show proof that everyone is and no one gets benefits.
I've never said they were.
So you keep trying to conjure up millions of able-bodied people who are choosing not to work, just so they can get benefits, but you've offered no proof of that. Like, at all.
You expect me to accept that it's a given there are millions of otherwise healthy people choosing not to work, and I'm not accepting that given because you haven't provided any evidence to support it.
The reason you can't is obvious. It's a fact you're a piece of shit socialist that has never worked a day in his miserable life and wants people like me to pay more taxes so you can continue to be a drain on society.
Now you're just projecting...I'm beginning to think you're just a self-loathing Conservative whose life didn't amount to anything, and you're posturing rugged individualism on a message board just so you can feel better about yourself.
No, of course not. Because there are disabled people, retirees, veterans, and children.
Typical socialist false argument.
This leech doesn't work and thinks someone owes her something.
I've never said they were.
So you keep trying to conjure up millions of able-bodied people who are choosing not to work, just so they can get benefits, but you've offered no proof of that. Like, at all.
You expect me to accept that it's a given there are millions of otherwise healthy people choosing not to work, and I'm not accepting that given because you haven't provided any evidence to support it.
Now you're just projecting...I'm beginning to think you're just a self-loathing Conservative whose life didn't amount to anything, and you're posturing rugged individualism on a message board just so you can feel better about yourself.
So you admit there are people that have never worked yet they should get coverage?
I'm identifying how a cowardly piece of shit like you lives.