Freedom of Speech, ....... Democrat style

N

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) - You can still boo or hiss at a basketball, baseball, or football game, but if you try it at a Riverhead town board meeting, you could be told it’s against the rules.
The board voted four to one to approve the new rule at meetings saying that the public cannot make distracting sounds like booing or hissing.
Councilman James Wooten was the one vote against it.

http://tinyurl.com/czb5j5y
 
NOVA said:
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) - You can still boo or hiss at a basketball, baseball, or football game, but if you try it at a Riverhead town board meeting, you could be told it’s against the rules.
The board voted four to one to approve the new rule at meetings saying that the public cannot make distracting sounds like booing or hissing.
Councilman James Wooten was the one vote against it.

http://tinyurl.com/czb5j5y
Click to expand...

At 11:06 today
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?49868-NY-town-leaders-say-it-s-OK-to-cheer-but-not-boo-at-public-board-meetings
 
NOVA said:
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) - You can still boo or hiss at a basketball, baseball, or football game, but if you try it at a Riverhead town board meeting, you could be told it’s against the rules.
The board voted four to one to approve the new rule at meetings saying that the public cannot make distracting sounds like booing or hissing.
Councilman James Wooten was the one vote against it.

http://tinyurl.com/czb5j5y
Click to expand...

A sporting event is quite different from a meeting and this particular group's majority decided they wanted this rule.

There are other ways to voice your disagreement, public testimony is one.
 
Last edited:
NOVA said:
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) - You can still boo or hiss at a basketball, baseball, or football game, but if you try it at a Riverhead town board meeting, you could be told it’s against the rules.
The board voted four to one to approve the new rule at meetings saying that the public cannot make distracting sounds like booing or hissing.
Councilman James Wooten was the one vote against it.

http://tinyurl.com/czb5j5y
Click to expand...


Which party made a big deal out of booing at town meetings?

TOWN OF RIVERHEAD

Supervisor
Hon. Sean Walter (Rep)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
631-737-2400 ext. 654
walter@riverheadli.com

Town Clerk
Diane Wilhelm (Dem)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
Phone: 631-727-3200 ext. 260
wilhelm@riverheadli.com

Receiver of Taxes
Hon. Maryann Wowak Heilbrunn (Rep)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
(631) 727-3200 Ext 248
helibrun@riverheadli.com

Superintendent of Highways
Hon. George “Gio” Woodson (Dem)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
Phone: 631-727-3200 ext. 228
woodson@riverheadli.com

RIVERHEAD TOWN COUNCIL

Hon. John Dunleavy Jr. (Rep)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
631-727-3200 Ext. 224
email: dunleavy@riverheadli.com

Hon. George Gabrielson (Rep)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
631-727-3200 Ext. 223
email: gabrielsen@riverheadli.com

Hon. Jodi Giglio (Rep)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
631-727-3200 Ext. 225
email: giglio@riverheadli.com

Hon James Wooten (Rep)
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
631-727-3200 Ext. 226
email: wooten@riverheadli.com


Guess ol Not So superNOVA should check his facts before going on one of his rants...LMAO!
 
I don't much care what party anyone belongs to.....my point was, its freedom of speech, democrat style.....ie, "in the style of Democrats"....

Party affilation at the town council level means nothing.....in my town, candidates, , usually being unopposed... run on both tickets....
 
NOVA said:
I don't much care what party anyone belongs to.....my point was, its freedom of speech, democrat style.....ie, "in the style of Democrats"....

Party affilation at the town council level means nothing.....in my town, candidates, , usually being unopposed... run on both tickets....
Click to expand...

Fail. I thought you were going to point out that the opposition was Republican. Lol
 
NOVA said:
I don't much care what party anyone belongs to.....my point was, its freedom of speech, democrat style.....ie, "in the style of Democrats"....

Party affilation at the town council level means nothing.....in my town, candidates, , usually being unopposed... run on both tickets....
Click to expand...


How convenient...find out the town council you were bitching about is filled with Righties and not Democrats, immediately start back pedaling and claiming you only meant "in the style " of Democrats...LMAO!!

This was an arrogant town council filled with angry Righties who don't believe they should be subjected to dissenters expressing their opinions...funny how Righties didn't mind vocal opposition when it was Tea Baggers doing the vocalizing at meetings.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
How convenient...find out the town council you were bitching about is filled with Righties and not Democrats, immediately start back pedaling and claiming you only meant "in the style " of Democrats...LMAO!!

This was an arrogant town council filled with angry Righties who don't believe they should be subjected to dissenters expressing their opinions...funny how Righties didn't mind vocal opposition when it was Tea Baggers doing the vocalizing at meetings.
Click to expand...


Claiming I said it ?.....its plainly written in the opening post, asshole.....its not even debatable, its not in the tiniest bit ambiguous....the words are there to see.
 
NOVA said:
Claiming I said it ?.....its plainly written in the opening post, asshole.....its not even debatable, its not in the tiniest bit ambiguous....the words are there to see.
Click to expand...

Of course it's debateable...of COURSE it's ambiguous!

NOWHERE did you bother pointing out that this anti-booing bill was pushed through the town council meeting by a town council FILLED with Righties.

If you'd pointed out that particular fact in your OP you might be believable when you claimed you don't care what party controls the town council.

Except you didn't...until you got busted lying.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Of course it's debateable...of COURSE it's ambiguous!

NOWHERE did you bother pointing out that this anti-booing bill was pushed through the town council meeting by a town council FILLED with Righties.

If you'd pointed out that particular fact in your OP you might be believable when you claimed you don't care what party controls the town council.

Except you didn't...until you got busted lying.
Click to expand...

The title of the thread is plain and undeniable......freedom of speech-Democrat style......thats the point

If if wanted to make something else my point I would have done so......spin away, fruitloops....

And what lie did I tell in the op ?
 
Lol. I haven't seen so much bald faced lying backtrscking since Yurtroll.

Next we know Bravo's going to claim they were all kidding.
 
NOVA said:
The title of the thread is plain and undeniable......freedom of speech-Democrat style......thats the point

If if wanted to make something else my point I would have done so......spin away, fruitloops....

And what lie did I tell in the op ?
Click to expand...


And you said not a word regarding the political makeup of the town council in the hopes no one would call you on your horseshit.

OOOOPSIE...too bad...you got busted lying your ass off and now your credibility is Z-E-R-O!

You tried to imply that it is Liberals that want to outlaw voicing a dissenting position in this case...only that's not the case...it's hypocritical Righties who don't want any dissent in their meetings.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
How convenient...find out the town council you were bitching about is filled with Righties and not Democrats...
Click to expand...

What makes you think these people are righties? This is a New York town.

For your information, dumbass, in NY State, Republicans are liberal, and Democrats are socialist.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
And you said not a word regarding the political makeup of the town council in the hopes no one would call you on your horseshit.

OOOOPSIE...too bad...you got busted lying your ass off and now your credibility is Z-E-R-O!

You tried to imply that it is Liberals that want to outlaw voicing a dissenting position in this case...only that's not the case...it's hypocritical Righties who don't want any dissent in their meetings.
Click to expand...


Soooooooooo....in the Weird World of Zappa, I lied by not posting something......:palm:
 
NOVA said:
Soooooooooo....in the Weird World of Zappa, I lied by not posting something......:palm:
Click to expand...


That's correct.

It's referred to as a LIE OF OMISSION.

Lie of Omission: "Deliberately and selectively presenting facts to convince people of one thing, when you know that if you presented all of the facts they will come to a different conclusion."
 
That's retarded Zippy. Since libs like you react with emotion instead or reason, no one knows how you would interpret facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top