Auster
New member
The New York Times’s Imaginary Gun Law
http://www.redstate.com/2013/09/18/the-new-york-timess-imaginary-gun-law/
http://www.redstate.com/2013/09/18/the-new-york-timess-imaginary-gun-law/
FRIEND: Navy Yard Shooter Liberal, Supported Obama
- Thread starter SJJRSJJS
- Start date
SJJRSJJS
Verified User
So you have also read the Commie Manifesto, you just admitted it by making your comparison between Liberal followings and the Commie Manifesto doctrines. I hope that the rest of your Forum Lib cohors would just come out and admit that they have read it like you did, so we can just MoveOn...org. It never ceases to amaze me how Libs, who think they are such brilliant writers, screw up all the time, and your servant(ME) manages to catch them ****ing up everytime, I must be a brilliant writer, and I can't be beat.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
What is different from what you believe and what they believe? How do you differ? And please be more specific than "I don't think the government should own the means of production?
For example where do you differ from Communists on:
Unions?
Environment?
Social justice?
Multiculturalism?
Welfare?
Ready? Go!!
christiefan915
Catalyst
Clever boy.
christiefan915
Catalyst
The breitbart article may be accurate but we don't know because it's hearsay. As for the OP, it's nothing but another of SJJ's incoherent opinions.
wanderingbear
Radical liberal
Because your so called facts are double talk and lies created by you.
wanderingbear
Radical liberal
Just because Ive read it doesn't mean I follow it.
Because then you'd have to share your stuff with people who don't have any?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Can SJJ prove this paper tiger is true? "This is done to appease the already embarassed Obama, because if Barrack claimed Trayvon Martin as a Son, then he will have to claim Aaron also, to be politically correct...."