How Pa.’s Supreme Court moved left, and what it means for the GOPWell, Judge Matthew Brann from PA is a republican.
August 9, 2019
https://www.penncapital-star.com/go...urt-moved-left-and-what-it-means-for-the-gop/
How Pa.’s Supreme Court moved left, and what it means for the GOPWell, Judge Matthew Brann from PA is a republican.
of course,as it should be.Justice will be served, dookie. You've got hundreds of posts advocating insurrection, attacking the US government, promoting both Putin and Trump. I'm confident the FBI will sort it out. All they need to know is where to start.![]()
Justice will be served, dookie. You've got hundreds of posts advocating insurrection, attacking the US government, promoting both Putin and Trump. I'm confident the FBI will sort it out. All they need to know is where to start.
![]()
MuIt is simple, YES or NO..........
of course,as it should be.
must you inflict us with a sig half the page size? any other board would not allow that -
it's difficult to scroll thru with mobile devices
WOW, didn't see that..
"WE storm".....
Sounds like a pretty clear defense of the attack & perhaps those to follow........
How Pa.’s Supreme Court moved left, and what it means for the GOP
August 9, 2019
https://www.penncapital-star.com/go...urt-moved-left-and-what-it-means-for-the-gop/
you should READ IT instead of REACT to it .WOW, didn't see that..
Sounds like a pretty clear defense of the attack & perhaps those to follow........
OK sorry.That's true but I'm referring to the judge who decided against trump in trump v. Boockvar. One of the state judges ruled in trump's favor, though, Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt on counting some cured ballots.
You think it is more feasible that 60 judges, appointed by Trump are corrupt than that he just doesn't have any evidence?You get a perfect goose egg *either* because of one or the other. One is more plausible than the other.
What does Zuckerberg tell you to think about it?
Your arrogance is only outweighed by your stupidity.It’s actually hard to not win a single case out of that many.
What would be plausible would be 3-whatever. Courts weren’t going to touch it. Conspiracy implies coordination and none was necessary.
I’m already bored with training you how to think. You’re on your own.
Truly is is unbelievable.Not, it isn't hard WHEN YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE. So, you can't explain your vast federal judiciary conspiracy, huh, hammerhead? No coordination? Just every single judge all over the country deciding they wouldn't do their sworn duty because Donald Trump?
ROTLFMFAO!!! Do you have any idea what a simpleton you are?
You really don't know how insane that sounds, do you?You’re as bad as your buddy lol.
Who said anything about a plot? All it takes it cowardice. Think: Occams. No plot necessary.
No charge.
Another who is entirely bereft of reason.
You really don't know how insane that sounds, do you?
Goes to his complete lack of empathy you brain dead fool.feels..WTF cares? Thats like a 14 year old girl political criteria
do you think China cares about "feels?" LOL
ThisTheir feelings.
Lying liar is lying.what "China Policy" he's already abandoned bilateral talks in favor of the toothless WTO "grievances".
we used to win them all the time, but they are unenforceable.. China ignored the results
That leads to malign trade practices,and IP theft -all of which TRUMP HAD NEGOTIATED
and Biden merely had to continue.
But he won't. Biden's China policy is "Orange man bad"