Frothy anal lubricant reference might be accurate

[poet]

Glad to see you passed the test.......I was just curious to see if you'd be a grammar Nazi asshole again.........

Grammar Nazi:




A person on the Internet that uses proper spelling and grammar. They usually dwell on forums or other social websites and correct the grammar/spelling of, or insult those who have improper grammar or spelling.

The Grammar Nazi will be hated by the person targeted by "He who spells". The "victim" will usually resort to useless insults.

It is a sophisticated form of trolling. The end result is serving the duty of the Grammar Nazi, and causing the idiot to be enraged.

(Assuming this takes place on YouTube. GN = Grammar Nazi.)

Person: "dat vid was sooo tight man u r a genius. da vid iz funny cuz its tru"

GN: "Excuse me. Did you take elementary school English classes? It seems that your sentence has many spelling and punctuation mistakes.

Person: "*response or private message* hey man wat da hell iz wrong with u? just cuz u no how 2 spell doesnt make u ne smarter. u r probably a virgin or gay. hahaha. u cant even get gurlz. deres no reason 2 b a grammer nazi"

GN: "Well, it might not make me smarter, but it definitely makes you dumber. Don't even get me started on the mistakes in that response."

*to self* "Success."

LOL. So true. So pertinent. So "me".

 

[zappasguitar]

ad hom? do you even know what that means? you were wrong, but instead of admitting it, you whined. grow up.

sheeesh

From post Number 2:

two threads from the same far left wing site and you have the nerve to bitch when others post from right wing sites. what a whiny hypocrite.

ad ho·mi·nem/ˈad ˈhämənəm/

Adverb: 1. (of an argument or reaction) Arising from or appealing to the emotions and not reason or logic.

2. Attacking an opponent's motives or character rather than the policy or position they maintain.

As a matter of fact, I do...

Ready to apologize for the ad hom right out of the box or are you going to CONTINUE to stall and pretend you did nothing?

 

[poet]

Speaking of Obama's failed leadership... any chance we are going to get him to put out a budget on time this year? Any chance he pressures his party in the Senate to actually PASS a budget? I know they have shirked their responsibilities since 2009, but enough is enough... do the Dems continue to just wander around spending at will with no budget in place? Or will they actually do their jobs this year?

Really? Think about that the next time your side tries to hold raising the debt ceiling hostage, until cuts are made in social programs, while preserving the tax cuts for the wealthy.
Or even fucking raising the minimum wage, while Wall St. CEO's rack up bonuses and payouts...on Congress engages in "insider information. Hypocrites.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Really? Think about that the next time your side tries to hold raising the debt ceiling hostage, until cuts are made in social programs, while preserving the tax cuts for the wealthy.
Or even fucking raising the minimum wage, while Wall St. CEO's rack up bonuses and payouts...on Congress engages in "insider information. Hypocrites.

What does that have to do with the Dems failure to pass a budget? They didn't pass a budget when they had complete control of Congress with Super Majorities.

They didn't raise the debt ceiling when they had complete majorities.... they WAITED so that they could FORCE the Reps HAVE to raise it with them. Because they didn't want the responsibility of doing it on their own. Which they could have, but failed.

The minimum wage is a f'in joke. It does NO good to raise it. None. All you do is raise the costs of employment across the board. Those costs get translated into higher costs of goods and services.

 

[apple0154]

Right in his response????? How about getting him out of office the ol' American way.....morally, ethically, and legally? Lying, or smearing, at all costs, to get your way???????????

Bush and Cheney circumvented the Constitution, and embroiled us in two (or three) illegal wars, and it was much ado about nothing, coming from the right. So, STFU.

It wasn't about arguing, it was about setting the record straight...but first he'd have to possess morality himself (which he does not, by the way....suggesting that a rape victim should have to live with the consequences or product of her raping. Such morality. Such compassion. Such BS).

Ah, if you could only spell and be able to distinguish "you're" from "your". Alas.

There's nothing "stand up" about Santorum or Gingrich or, as you mentioned in msg #14, John McCain who sold his reputation for a shot at the White House. And we witnessed, telecast live, the people who support them.

Then they bicker over who asked for the divorce, Newt or his wife, as if to offer some justification.

Newt: I have a mistress and want an open marriage.
Newt's wife: That's not acceptable. I want a divorce.

Ah, ha!! She asked for the divorce. It's her fault!

That's the Repub, Conservative twisted thinking just as the reprobates in South Carolina gave a standing ovation when the perverted slime feigned indignation at a question regarding his "family values". I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen the debate myself. A room full of decent looking people giving a standing ovation to a two time adulterer who left two partners the moment they contracted serious illnesses. And they have the gall to say Liberals have relaxed morals. The live telecast showed the average Repub wouldn't know a moral or a value if they tripped over one.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

There's nothing "stand up" about Santorum or Gingrich or, as you mentioned in msg #14, John McCain who sold his reputation for a shot at the White House. And we witnessed, telecast live, the people who support them.

Then they bicker over who asked for the divorce, Newt or his wife, as if to offer some justification.

Newt: I have a mistress and want an open marriage.
Newt's wife: That's not acceptable. I want a divorce.

Ah, ha!! She asked for the divorce. It's her fault!

That's the Repub, Conservative twisted thinking just as the reprobates in South Carolina gave a standing ovation when the perverted slime feigned indignation at a question regarding his "family values". I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen the debate myself. A room full of decent looking people giving a standing ovation to a two time adulterer who left two partners the moment they contracted serious illnesses. And they have the gall to say Liberals have relaxed morals. The live telecast showed the average Repub wouldn't know a moral or a value if they tripped over one.

So bottom line what you are saying is that no matter how many times the underlined has been debunked as a complete lie... you are going to continue repeating it? yeah, I would say you have relaxed morals.

 

[poet]

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

View attachment 1473

Medicaid... free health care for the poor.

Obama care... what was that for again?

 

[apple0154]

So bottom line what you are saying is that no matter how many times the underlined has been debunked as a complete lie... you are going to continue repeating it? yeah, I would say you have relaxed morals.

When he shows up at the hospital to discuss a divorce I'm not going to pick at whether he sprang it on her at that moment or a day or a week prior. If they were discussing a divorce that means it was a current event and there is the time interval between his wife being diagnosed and having the operation/procedure meaning it happened at the same time. It doesn't have to mean the exact same minute. And who the hell visits a hospitalized individual to discuss a divorce? A hospital visitation is supposed to be of benefit to the patient, to life their spirits. Not an opportunity to discuss a divorce with a medicated patient. And, furthermore, the daughters said they heard them arguing.

Visiting a hospitalized patient and starting an argument over a divorce. That is where the word "despicable" is appropriate, not to describe a question concerning "family values" directed to a slime known to have few, if any, values.

 

[zappasguitar]

Rick Santorum showed what a gutless coward he really is earlier today...way to stand up and tell the TRUTH, Rick!


At a Rick Santorum town hall meeting in Lady Lake, Florida moments ago, a woman stood up to declare that she doesn’t like to refer to “President Obama as president because, legally, he is not.” While the audience gasped and clapped at the comment, Santorum restrained himself, refusing to utter a critical word.
The lady continued, Obama “totally ignores” the Constitution, prompting a nod of approval from Santorum. Then she went even further with her conspiracy rant:
He is an avowed Muslim. [applause] And my question is: why isn’t something being done to get him out of our government? He has no legal right to be calling himself President.
In an exemplary show of cowardice, Santorum did not tell the woman that she had her facts wrong or even bother to distance himself from the previous comments. Instead, he did the opposite, giving sanction to her views. “I’m doing my best to get him out” of office, Santorum said, “and you’re right about — he uniformly ignores the Constitution.”
The tail continued to wag the dog as the lady pressed Santorum for tougher language about Obama’s unconstitutionality. Santorum meekly responded, “I agree with you in the sense that he is – he does things that are against the values and the founding principles of our country.”

First, of course, Obama is not an “avowed Muslim.” He is a Christian.
And he certainly has every right to be calling himself President as he was soundly elected by the people and has sworn an oath (twice) to uphold his duty to serve and protect the United States.
For Santorum, who frequently touts the need for strong “leadership” in this country, today’s profile in weakness shows he’s unable to stand up to his own right-wing fringe.


UPDATE
Santorum told members of the press after the event that it’s “not my responsibility” to correct when someone calls Obama a Muslim. He turned it on the press and said, “why don’t you do it?”?


http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2...-woman-who-alleges-obama-is-an-avowed-muslim/

UPDATE:

During a town hall event in Florida yesterday, Rick Santorum refused to correct a woman who told him that President Obama is “an avowed Muslim” and is not a “legal” president. Instead, in an exemplary show of cowardice, Santorum pandered to the woman, saying he agreed with her on some of the things she was saying.

This morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, New York Magazine’s John Heilemann asked Santorum why he didn’t show leadership in that instance. Santorum said what he failed to say yesterday: “I’ve said repeatedly that I don’t believe President Obama’s a Muslim, and he’s qualified.”

But then Santorum excused his failure in judgment by spinning it as an example of his own chivalry:

This was an elderly lady. She was there leaning on a cane. She was quite wobbly. And I’m not going to sit there and slam an older lady because she has some way out – some bizarre beliefs. It’s your responsibility to defend the President, not mine. […] I’m not here to defend the President against scurrilous attacks. It’s not my job.

Heilemann noted that when John McCain was confronted in 2008 by a town hall participant who similarly accused Obama of being something he is not, McCain told the woman she was wrong. “Let me be clear, I am not John McCain,” Santorum responded.

By openly acknowledging that he will not reject “scurrilous attacks” against Obama, Santorum is essentially sanctioning them.

Ironically, Santorum recently issued this attack against Mitt Romney: “We don’t need someone who supports lies and promotes lies and stands behind those lies in order to get elected president.” Indeed.


UNLESS OF COURSE it's Santorum doing the supporting and promoting of lies about Obama...

 

[poet]

Medicaid... free health care for the poor.

Obama care... what was that for again?

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)[1][2] is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. The law (along with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) is the principal health care reform legislation of the 111th United States Congress. PPACA reforms certain aspects of the private health insurance industry and public health insurance programs, increases insurance coverage of pre-existing conditions, expands access to insurance to over 30 million Americans,[3][4] and increases projected national medical spending[5][6] while lowering projected Medicare spending.[7]

PPACA passed the Senate on December 24, 2009, by a vote of 60–39 with all Democrats and two Independents voting for, and all Republicans voting against.[8] It passed the House of Representatives on March 21, 2010, by a vote of 219–212, with 34 Democrats and all 178 Republicans voting against the bill.[9]

 

[apple0154]

UPDATE:

During a town hall event in Florida yesterday, Rick Santorum refused to correct a woman who told him that President Obama is “an avowed Muslim” and is not a “legal” president. Instead, in an exemplary show of cowardice, Santorum pandered to the woman, saying he agreed with her on some of the things she was saying.

This morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, New York Magazine’s John Heilemann asked Santorum why he didn’t show leadership in that instance. Santorum said what he failed to say yesterday: “I’ve said repeatedly that I don’t believe President Obama’s a Muslim, and he’s qualified.”

But then Santorum excused his failure in judgment by spinning it as an example of his own chivalry:

This was an elderly lady. She was there leaning on a cane. She was quite wobbly. And I’m not going to sit there and slam an older lady because she has some way out – some bizarre beliefs. It’s your responsibility to defend the President, not mine. […] I’m not here to defend the President against scurrilous attacks. It’s not my job.

Heilemann noted that when John McCain was confronted in 2008 by a town hall participant who similarly accused Obama of being something he is not, McCain told the woman she was wrong. “Let me be clear, I am not John McCain,” Santorum responded.

By openly acknowledging that he will not reject “scurrilous attacks” against Obama, Santorum is essentially sanctioning them.

Ironically, Santorum recently issued this attack against Mitt Romney: “We don’t need someone who supports lies and promotes lies and stands behind those lies in order to get elected president.” Indeed.


UNLESS OF COURSE it's Santorum doing the supporting and promoting of lies about Obama...

I've come to the conclusion one is wise to remember "Thou doth protest too much" when listening to Repubs. Just as Santorum rails against Romney after saying he's not there to do that we've heard Newt previously go on about Freddy Mac while collecting 1.6 million as an "historian". It's truly a shameful site to see.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

When he shows up at the hospital to discuss a divorce I'm not going to pick at whether he sprang it on her at that moment or a day or a week prior. If they were discussing a divorce that means it was a current event and there is the time interval between his wife being diagnosed and having the operation/procedure meaning it happened at the same time. It doesn't have to mean the exact same minute. And who the hell visits a hospitalized individual to discuss a divorce? A hospital visitation is supposed to be of benefit to the patient, to life their spirits. Not an opportunity to discuss a divorce with a medicated patient. And, furthermore, the daughters said they heard them arguing.

Visiting a hospitalized patient and starting an argument over a divorce. That is where the word "despicable" is appropriate, not to describe a question concerning "family values" directed to a slime known to have few, if any, values.

So again, you are going to keep restating the LIE. Thanks for the clarification. We now have no doubt as to your moral code. LIE LIE LIE.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)[1][2] is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. The law (along with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) is the principal health care reform legislation of the 111th United States Congress. PPACA reforms certain aspects of the private health insurance industry and public health insurance programs, increases insurance coverage of pre-existing conditions, expands access to insurance to over 30 million Americans,[3][4] and increases projected national medical spending[5][6] while lowering projected Medicare spending.[7]

PPACA passed the Senate on December 24, 2009, by a vote of 60–39 with all Democrats and two Independents voting for, and all Republicans voting against.[8] It passed the House of Representatives on March 21, 2010, by a vote of 219–212, with 34 Democrats and all 178 Republicans voting against the bill.[9]

So again... since Medicaid ALREADY covered providing free health care to the poor... what was the point of your stupid little Jesus picture pretending that it was Obamacare that provides for the poor?

 

[cancel2 2022]

So again, you are going to keep restating the LIE. Thanks for the clarification. We now have no doubt as to your moral code. LIE LIE LIE.

The only other version I've heard is the daughter's one, who was thirteen at the time and may well have sided with her father. Do you have any independent corroboration of the story?

 

[Bonestorm]

Lie: Gingrich served divorce papers on his wife while she was recovering from cancer surgery.

Truth: Gingrich sought to discuss the terms of their divorce while his wife was in the hospital recovering from her third surgery relating to uterine cancer. (It has been reported that the mass removed from this particular surgery turned out to be benign).


What a swell guy!

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

The only other version I've heard is the daughter's one, who was thirteen at the time and may well have sided with her father. Do you have any independent corroboration of the story?

http://www.factcheck.org/2011/12/the-gingrich-divorce-myth/

The above is probably the most detailed I have seen that describes the accounts (and bad recollections on the daughter you mention) from the different parties.

Bottom line, I would like to see Apple's evidence that the second divorce was also done in the hospital blah blah blah... Bottom line, he is either blatantly continuing the lie or is determined to remain ignorant of the facts of the matter.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Lie: Gingrich served divorce papers on his wife while she was recovering from cancer surgery.

Truth: Gingrich sought to discuss the terms of their divorce while his wife was in the hospital recovering from her third surgery relating to uterine cancer. (It has been reported that the mass removed from this particular surgery turned out to be benign).
What a swell guy!

LMAO... so you are going to shift away from the first lie and onto the second unsubstantiated lie. What a swell guy.

According to Fact Check... Gingrich's wife at the time was contesting the divorce that was filed for by Gingrich. He went by the hospital with his daughters to see how she was doing. They ended up getting into a fight about the divorce. There is a huge difference between that and 'he went to the hospital to specifically talk about the divorce.' line of crap that the left is now tossing around since their original LIE has been blown out of the water.

 

[Bonestorm]

LMAO... so you are going to shift away from the first lie and onto the second unsubstantiated lie. What a swell guy.

According to Fact Check... Gingrich's wife at the time was contesting the divorce that was filed for by Gingrich. He went by the hospital with his daughters to see how she was doing. They ended up getting into a fight about the divorce. There is a huge difference between that and 'he went to the hospital to specifically talk about the divorce.' line of crap that the left is now tossing around since their original LIE has been blown out of the water.

For someone who wants to split hairs, you sure don't read very carefully. I said that he "sought to discuss the terms of their divorce while his wife was in the hospital." I was careful not to subscribe any intent to Newt relating to that visit. You, on the other hand, are apparently a time travelling mind reader since you claim to know why Newt went to the hospital.

My statement was 100% truthful. I don't need to lie about it to show what a fuck Gingrich is.

 

[zappasguitar]

http://www.factcheck.org/2011/12/the-gingrich-divorce-myth/

The above is probably the most detailed I have seen that describes the accounts (and bad recollections on the daughter you mention) from the different parties.

Bottom line, I would like to see Apple's evidence that the second divorce was also done in the hospital blah blah blah... Bottom line, he is either blatantly continuing the lie or is determined to remain ignorant of the facts of the matter.

That's it...stay focused on the details...that way you won't have address the underlying situation...that Gingrich CHEATED ON HIS FIRST TWO WIVES. He dishonored his marriage and the oath he took before God to remain faithful to his wife.