Frothy anal lubricant reference might be accurate

"like Newts argument with his wife... it takes two."

Do you really believe it always takes two?

Yes. It takes at least two. Unless of course the person is arguing with themselves.


Let's say you got married and five years later you were diagnosed with MS (God forbid). And then six months after that your wife filed for divorce. If you were arguing with her about her action, I wouldn't say that you were at fault. You'd have a right to be pissed, and for your own mental health, you would be wise to express it.

Um... it is not a question of Gingrich's wife being 'at fault' for anything. A person can certainly be justified for being angry/pissed and expressing that to the person that caused it. That said, in your situation, if you came to visit me in the hospital to see if I was ok, I would probably be telling you to fuck off and listing the reasons why. We don't know who 'started' the discussion/argument. That is the point. Dung is trying to insert HIS OPINION of why Gingrich went to the hospital.

There's enough clouds hanging around this guy and he's engaged in enough dubious behavior that I just feel sorry for the women who married him. He's a bad catch. Any woman who gets a nibble from him should throw him back.

On that we agree. He is a douche bag of the Dung variety.
 
LMAO... typical lefty nonsense. Just because I am correcting LIES the left likes to propagate, does not mean I am defending Gingrich's cheating on his wives.

As for the 'quibbling'... like Newts argument with his wife... it takes two. When fact check shows your lies to be LIES... perhaps you should just accept that. Then we wouldn't have to explain for 'DAYS' why you are wrong over and over and over again.

Fact check shows "my lies to be lies"?

Which "lies"?

The only statement I've made concerning the Gingrich divorces is that Gingrich CHEATED ON HIS FIRST TWO WIVES.

Show me the lie in that statement.

How is that statement "wrong", as you've claimed?
 
Fact check shows "my lies to be lies"?

Which "lies"?

The only statement I've made concerning the Gingrich divorces is that Gingrich CHEATED ON HIS FIRST TWO WIVES.

Show me the lie in that statement.

How is that statement "wrong", as you've claimed?

You stated I had been 'quibbling with us'... you were including yourself in the argument that the others were discussing. That involves the LIES I was referencing.

When I stated 'your lies' I was referring to the same group of people you included yourself in.
 
Um... it is not a question of Gingrich's wife being 'at fault' for anything. A person can certainly be justified for being angry/pissed and expressing that to the person that caused it. That said, in your situation, if you came to visit me in the hospital to see if I was ok, I would probably be telling you to fuck off and listing the reasons why. We don't know who 'started' the discussion/argument. That is the point. Dung is trying to insert HIS OPINION of why Gingrich went to the hospital.

I'm not trying to assert my opinion of why he went there, I'm restating the uncontradicted statement of his wife regarding what happened once he got there,.


On that we agree. He is a douche bag of the Dung variety.

I'm just going to go ahead and ignore that one. Them's fightin words, son.
 
You know what, he left one wife while she had cancer and another after she was diagnosed with MS. There's really no way to spin that, regardless of whether we were in the room and know what he said/she said.

I don't see how any of this even matters or why the right is getting so defensive. I don't think Newt can become the nominee. I have read he doesn't even have the delegates in place. And he's got the entire Republican establishment against him. It's still going to be Romney from what I can gather.

Newt's a slime, women know it, but he's never going to be President so who really cares? You can swing a dead cat in any club on any give night and hit nine more just like him. They often have a white band of skin where their wedding ring usually sits.

The only thing worse; would have been if he was have phone sex while his wife was in another room. :)
 
I'm not trying to assert my opinion of why he went there, I'm restating the uncontradicted statement of his wife regarding what happened once he got there,.

Neither you nor his wife know his intent on why he went there. The fact his wife made comments that he did not contradict doesn't mean affirmation. It could just as easily mean he doesn't want to get into it again. Especially given the lefts propensity to blow everything regarding her out of proportion.

I'm just going to go ahead and ignore that one. Them's fightin words, son.

yeah, that was below the belt. If I wasn't evil, I might feel guilty about it.
 
Yes. It takes at least two. Unless of course the person is arguing with themselves.




Um... it is not a question of Gingrich's wife being 'at fault' for anything. A person can certainly be justified for being angry/pissed and expressing that to the person that caused it. That said, in your situation, if you came to visit me in the hospital to see if I was ok, I would probably be telling you to fuck off and listing the reasons why. We don't know who 'started' the discussion/argument. That is the point. Dung is trying to insert HIS OPINION of why Gingrich went to the hospital.



On that we agree. He is a douche bag of the Dung variety.

LOL Would you leave poor DH alone? Just because he skewers you on a daily basis there's no need to get so bitter!
 
Back
Top