He is weak and not witty.Some women are attracted to powerful witty men like Trump.
He is weak and not witty.Some women are attracted to powerful witty men like Trump.
It is derogatory, it is not regularly used among law enforcement because it is a derogatory term for that activity.Its not derogatory, and it is sex work. I do not like that she felt she was in a position where she felt it was necessary, I have compassion for her. I might have done the same in her shoes.
The person paying for sex is the one I generally have derogatory feelings for in a prostitution situation.
I bet you and I can find conversations where I talked about murder as a crime. I know for a fact we can... Just search for stuff about that jackwipe with his knee on that other guy's neck... You remember it... I bet you are right now crapping because you know we had that conversation...Run a search to see if you have said murder is wrong, I bet you will not find it.
He is arguably the most powerful man in the world and he is very funny. His with is part of his political appeal to crowds.He is weak and not witty.
What term are you talking about?It is derogatory, it is not regularly used among law enforcement because it is a derogatory term for that activity.
One who virtue signals about "retard" should be more careful about their word choices, especially if they are pretending they are not trying to paint someone ad "dirty" or "immoral"... but you were.
Again, you have found yourself in a hole. I recommend you just put the danged shovel down. You aren't getting around the actual posts in this thread. We have your words. We know what you think, and how you judge.
I have to go to work. I'll get back to this later. If you have a witness you bring who is in sex work, do you allow a prosecutor to call her a prostitute? If you do, you suck as an attorney.What term are you talking about?
When people claim "virtue signaling" I think it has more to do with them than the alleged signaler. Just because you feel you are receiving a signal, does not mean the other person intended what you feel.
Signals are subject to prejudice, when they are sent, and when they are received.
Florida law uses the word, and if someone is convicted of such, they can be called a prostitute.I have to go to work. I'll get back to this later. If you have a witness you bring who is in sex work, do you allow a prosecutor to call her a prostitute? If you do, you suck as an attorney.
Sugar daddies and sugar babies are a form of prostitution, aka sex in exchange for money.So having only one client makes it not prostitution?
This is a bit like the right wingers calling people illegal aliens. The letter of the law as opposed to what folks can and do say in context...Florida law uses the word, and if someone is convicted of such, they can be called a prostitute.
§ 796.07 Prohibiting prostitution and related acts.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) “Assignation” means the making of any appointment or engagement for prostitution or lewdness, or any act in furtherance of such appointment or engagement.
(b) “Female genitals” includes the labia minora, labia majora, clitoris, vulva, hymen, and vagina.
(c) “Lewdness” means any indecent or obscene act.
(d) “Prostitution” means the giving or receiving of the body for sexual activity for hire but excludes sexual activity between spouses.
(e) “Sexual activity” means oral, anal, or female genital penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; anal or female genital penetration of another by any other object; or the handling or fondling of the sexual organ of another for the purpose of masturbation; however, the term does not include acts done for bona fide medical purposes. Online Sunshine
(2) It is unlawful:
(a) To own, establish, maintain, or operate any place, structure, building, or conveyance for the purpose of lewdness, assignation, or prostitution.
(b) To offer, or to offer or agree to secure, another for the purpose of prostitution or for any other lewd or indecent act.
(c) To receive, or to offer or agree to receive, any person into any place, structure, building, or conveyance for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness, or assignation, or to permit any person to remain there for such purpose.
(d) To direct, take, or transport, or to offer or agree to direct, take, or transport, any person to any place, structure, or building, or to any other person, with knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that the purpose of such directing, taking, or transporting is prostitution, lewdness, or assignation.
(e) For a person 18 years of age or older to offer to commit, or to commit, or to engage in, prostitution, lewdness, or assignation.
(f) To solicit, induce, entice, or procure another to commit prostitution, lewdness, or assignation.
(g) To reside in, enter, or remain in, any place, structure, or building, or to enter or remain in any conveyance, for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness, or assignation.
(h) To aid, abet, or participate in any of the acts or things enumerated in this subsection.
(i) To purchase the services of any person engaged in prostitution. Online Sunshine
I honestly never thought of the word, its has always had a legal meaning to me.This is a bit like the right wingers calling people illegal aliens. The letter of the law as opposed to what folks can and do say in context...
But in reality it is prejudicial and you know you would not allow an opposing attorney to use such prejudicial language when less pejorative terms are available.
To avoid the pejorative, and to avoid prejudicial, the lawyers in court that I have attended call women who are prostitutes "sex workers". You do not call them by the crime, as that is deliberately and directly prejudicial.
Regardless, we know that the crime of prostitution is not the same as the person, and they are not called by their crime. If Melania was on the stand and asked if she was a prostitute the other attorney would object, though even if she was asked if she was a sex worker she would answer truthfully "no" as she never has committed such a criminal act as prostitution.
People who are not "whores" or "prostitutes" may be called such things by misogynistic jackwipes who want to paint them as whores or prostitutes based on who they marry and how much the dislike the person that the "prostitute" married... but we've already been over that. You know it is truth, but really want her to be viewed as something less than you... who would "never marry" for whatever reason you assign to Melania, though I guarantee she doesn't assign to that same relationship.
If Melania was asked on the stand if she married Trump for his money do you believe she would say "yes" or do you believe that her response that she "loved him" was perjury? What I do know is that only you are here defining women who marry people you do not like that have money as "prostitutes". This is on you, and nobody else. If they also come here they too will have the same misogynistic view that women who make choices they find questionable must be "less than" and therefore use pejorative terms to describe them. I think you know you can and that you absolutely should do better, but cannot abide speaking about people you do not like politically without being dismissive, considering them "less than" and describing them in the pejorative.
Technically if she said she loved him, I believe it would be perjury, but clearly imposable to prove that she was lying.This is a bit like the right wingers calling people illegal aliens. The letter of the law as opposed to what folks can and do say in context...
But in reality it is prejudicial and you know you would not allow an opposing attorney to use such prejudicial language when less pejorative terms are available.
To avoid the pejorative, and to avoid prejudicial, the lawyers in court that I have attended call women who are prostitutes "sex workers". You do not call them by the crime, as that is deliberately and directly prejudicial.
Regardless, we know that the crime of prostitution is not the same as the person, and they are not called by their crime. If Melania was on the stand and asked if she was a prostitute the other attorney would object, though even if she was asked if she was a sex worker she would answer truthfully "no" as she never has committed such a criminal act as prostitution.
People who are not "whores" or "prostitutes" may be called such things by misogynistic jackwipes who want to paint them as whores or prostitutes based on who they marry and how much the dislike the person that the "prostitute" married... but we've already been over that. You know it is truth, but really want her to be viewed as something less than you... who would "never marry" for whatever reason you assign to Melania, though I guarantee she doesn't assign to that same relationship.
If Melania was asked on the stand if she married Trump for his money do you believe she would say "yes" or do you believe that her response that she "loved him" was perjury? What I do know is that only you are here defining women who marry people you do not like that have money as "prostitutes". This is on you, and nobody else. If they also come here they too will have the same misogynistic view that women who make choices they find questionable must be "less than" and therefore use pejorative terms to describe them. I think you know you can and that you absolutely should do better, but cannot abide speaking about people you do not like politically without being dismissive, considering them "less than" and describing them in the pejorative.
Why should he care about any of that when you NEVER do. We have pinned you with your own words countless times, and you back and side peddle and then completely deny you meant what you said rather than putting the dang shovel down.It is derogatory, it is not regularly used among law enforcement because it is a derogatory term for that activity.
One who virtue signals about "retard" should be more careful about their word choices, especially if they are pretending they are not trying to paint someone ad "dirty" or "immoral"... but you were.
Again, you have found yourself in a hole. I recommend you just put the danged shovel down. You aren't getting around the actual posts in this thread. We have your words. We know what you think, and how you judge.
Sugar daddies and babies are just what used to be called high end escorts.Sugar daddies and sugar babies are a form of prostitution, aka sex in exchange for money.
Melania obviously is not physically attracted to Trump.
I agree with @QP! that your concern about the use of the word seems very disingenuous. Have you ever complained with someone on this cite who called a person an ILLEGAL?This is a bit like the right wingers calling people illegal aliens. The letter of the law as opposed to what folks can and do say in context...
But in reality it is prejudicial and you know you would not allow an opposing attorney to use such prejudicial language when less pejorative terms are available.
To avoid the pejorative, and to avoid prejudicial, the lawyers in court that I have attended call women who are prostitutes "sex workers". You do not call them by the crime, as that is deliberately and directly prejudicial.
Regardless, we know that the crime of prostitution is not the same as the person, and they are not called by their crime. If Melania was on the stand and asked if she was a prostitute the other attorney would object, though even if she was asked if she was a sex worker she would answer truthfully "no" as she never has committed such a criminal act as prostitution.
People who are not "whores" or "prostitutes" may be called such things by misogynistic jackwipes who want to paint them as whores or prostitutes based on who they marry and how much the dislike the person that the "prostitute" married... but we've already been over that. You know it is truth, but really want her to be viewed as something less than you... who would "never marry" for whatever reason you assign to Melania, though I guarantee she doesn't assign to that same relationship.
If Melania was asked on the stand if she married Trump for his money do you believe she would say "yes" or do you believe that her response that she "loved him" was perjury? What I do know is that only you are here defining women who marry people you do not like that have money as "prostitutes". This is on you, and nobody else. If they also come here they too will have the same misogynistic view that women who make choices they find questionable must be "less than" and therefore use pejorative terms to describe them. I think you know you can and that you absolutely should do better, but cannot abide speaking about people you do not like politically without being dismissive, considering them "less than" and describing them in the pejorative.
Trump is Malaria's sugar daddy. She doesn't seem to particularly like being with him, and is obviously not physically attracted to him. It all about the $$$.Sugar daddies and babies are just what used to be called high end escorts.
A gal who is in the sex for money trade game but has typically only one, or maybe a 2-3 clients only who have pretty regular visit time and pay her rent and bills and give her spending money.
Do you think she knows how to use an autopen?I think she is still a prostitute, just limited to one client.
Define the word: protistution.Its my opinion that such women who marry unattractive wealthy men much older than themselves are likely doing it for the money, and I call that protistution.
It is impossible to marry food.And what does that have to do with your claim that she was a prostitute?