GAO To Obama: More Oil Than Rest Of The World

http://news.investors.com/article/611380/201205141900/green-river-equal-to-worlds-oil-reserves-.htm

The Government Accountability Office tells Congress the Green River Formation out West contains an "amount about equal to the entire world's proven oil reserves." So why are we keeping it locked up on federal lands?

Exploding the Big Lie pushed by President Obama that we can't drill our way out of high gas prices because we have but 2% of the world's proven oil reserves, Anu Mittal, GAO director of natural resources and environment, testified before Congress last week that just one small part of the U.S. is capable of outproducing the rest of the planet.

That small part is known as the Green River Formation, the world's largest oil shale deposit, and is located in a largely vacant region of mostly federal land on the western edge of the Rocky Mountains that includes portions of Wyoming, Utah and Colorado.

As we have written in our "Oil And Gas/Fact And Fiction" series, the Green River Formation has been dubbed our Persia on the Plains, an area with technically recoverable oil in an amount estimated at four times the proven resources of Saudi Arabia.

Given that current U.S. daily oil consumption is running at 19.5 million barrels, the staggering amount of Green River reserves would by itself supply domestic oil consumption for more than 200 years. That sure blows the heck out of the "peak oil" theory that the world is running out of oil.

According to Mittal's testimony before the House science subcommittee on energy and the environment, the U.S. Geological Survey "estimates that the Green River Formation contains about 3 trillion barrels of oil, and about half of this may be recoverable, depending on available technology and economic conditions."

According to the president's bizarre formulation, this oil does not count as a "proven" reserve because little drilling has been done. There is a reason for that. As Mittal testified: "The federal government is in a unique position to influence the development of oil shale because 72% of the oil shale within the Green River Formation lies beneath federal lands managed by BLM (Bureau of Land Management)."
 
I posted stuff like this so many times......the amount of oil we have that is waiting to be developed would last us hundreds of years.....
 
I posted stuff like this so many times......the amount of oil we have that is waiting to be developed would last us hundreds of years.....

But they never heard you, they were too busy issuing drilling permits to China to drill off the coast of Cuba, where our own rigs are forbidden to go!
 
http://news.investors.com/article/611380/201205141900/green-river-equal-to-worlds-oil-reserves-.htm

The Government Accountability Office tells Congress the Green River Formation out West contains an "amount about equal to the entire world's proven oil reserves." So why are we keeping it locked up on federal lands?

Exploding the Big Lie pushed by President Obama that we can't drill our way out of high gas prices because we have but 2% of the world's proven oil reserves, Anu Mittal, GAO director of natural resources and environment, testified before Congress last week that just one small part of the U.S. is capable of outproducing the rest of the planet.

That small part is known as the Green River Formation, the world's largest oil shale deposit, and is located in a largely vacant region of mostly federal land on the western edge of the Rocky Mountains that includes portions of Wyoming, Utah and Colorado.

As we have written in our "Oil And Gas/Fact And Fiction" series, the Green River Formation has been dubbed our Persia on the Plains, an area with technically recoverable oil in an amount estimated at four times the proven resources of Saudi Arabia.

Given that current U.S. daily oil consumption is running at 19.5 million barrels, the staggering amount of Green River reserves would by itself supply domestic oil consumption for more than 200 years. That sure blows the heck out of the "peak oil" theory that the world is running out of oil.

According to Mittal's testimony before the House science subcommittee on energy and the environment, the U.S. Geological Survey "estimates that the Green River Formation contains about 3 trillion barrels of oil, and about half of this may be recoverable, depending on available technology and economic conditions."

According to the president's bizarre formulation, this oil does not count as a "proven" reserve because little drilling has been done. There is a reason for that. As Mittal testified: "The federal government is in a unique position to influence the development of oil shale because 72% of the oil shale within the Green River Formation lies beneath federal lands managed by BLM (Bureau of Land Management)."

You have to develop the field and bring it online, this won't be a quick fix, plus we need more refineries!
 
You have to develop the field and bring it online, this won't be a quick fix, plus we need more refineries!

no kidding...but if your fellow libs keep harping against development...your argument will of course always be true. on the other hand, if we had started development years ago, your argument would be weak.
 
On Feb. 1, the House Natural Resources Committee approved a three-headed monster of an energy bill: drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, drilling off the California coast, and expansion of oil shale drilling. But hey, the bill has the magic word “jobs” in the label, so it’s all good! The committee’s press release trumpets the quantity of oil shale lurking deep under the Green River formation (Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming) and the need for job creators’ certainty.

The committee doesn’t bother with the thirsty facts of oil shale mining. If drilling for easy oil can be analogized to sticking a straw into a lemon and watching juice seep up, obtaining oil from oil shale involves digging up fossilized lemons, reconstituting them with a lot of water - some estimates are 5 gallons of water for every gallon of oil - using vast quantities of energy to boil the watery dried out lemons, catching the vapor, distilling lemon juice vapor from water vapor, and dumping all that contaminated waste water somewhere. All these activities will be taking place in western Colorado and eastern Utah, not exactly known for their abundance of water.

The committee also doesn’t bother with the economics of oil shale mining. The technology isn’t in place for commercial oil shale mining and may never be. Oil shale, like nuclear fusion, has been "10 years away from commercial development" for much longer than 10 years; the Checks and Balances Project has compiled oil shale industry boosters' promises (PDF) going back to 1916. Unlike Canadian oil sands (aka tar sands), oil shale has never been produced commercially in the United States.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...n-the-Arid-West-or-Why-Don-t-We-Grow-Carrots-
 
no kidding...but if your fellow libs keep harping against development...your argument will of course always be true. on the other hand, if we had started development years ago, your argument would be weak.

Bush started it 2008, the lease process takes from 3-8 years. I have to go read what Obama says about the leases. Shale oil extraction is a dirty business and takes lots of water, there are environmental concerns and we are talking Colorado!
 
no kidding...but if your fellow libs keep harping against development...your argument will of course always be true. on the other hand, if we had started development years ago, your argument would be weak.


No one wanted to develop oil shale extraction years ago because it was too expensive and oil was cheap.
 
Bush started it 2008, the lease process takes from 3-8 years. I have to go read what Obama says about the leases. Shale oil extraction is a dirty business and takes lots of water, there are environmental concerns and we are talking Colorado!

the lease process should not take that long.

you're right about shale oil concerns. how do we balance that with out insatiable need for oil? what do you think of natural gas? city buses use natural gas....imagine if all our cars were required to use natural gas.
 
we aren't talking about that many years ago dung.....pay attention

It is still very expensive, plus the environmental issues which are severe. It is also dirty oil, burns emitting more gases. There is a lot to consider. Cheaper oil is still available, like the reserves in Alaska
 
Back
Top