^^^^ Continued anger issues. Continued evasion of the question asked.
Grow up, Boy.
If others want to play your silly, childish games with you...fine with me. I'm laughing at you...and your frustrations.
^^^^ Continued anger issues. Continued evasion of the question asked.
^^^^ Continued anger issues. Continued evasion of question asked.
Let me remind you of the question that I asked.How many networks are there? Three.
Such ignorance, I had hopes for him to be a reasonable, moderate Republican, but now he’s just another Trump mongrel.Sen. J.D. Vance's interview on ABC's "This Week" gets cut short after he made a comment implying he believes Trump can defy the Supreme Court.
During an appearance on ABC’s “This Week” with Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) Sunday, George Stephanopoulos abruptly ended the interview after Vance implied that Donald Trump can defy Supreme Court rulings.
“The Constitution says that the Supreme Court can make rulings, but if the Supreme Court ― and look, I hope that they would not do this ― but if the Supreme Court said that the president of the United States can’t fire a general, that would be an illegitimate ruling and the president has to have Article 2 prerogative under the Constitution to actually run the military as he sees fit,” Vance said.
Wow. Stephanopoulos shuts down his interview with Vance and cuts him off after Vance insists that the president can defy the Supreme Court. pic.twitter.com/P2Kn60Jr29
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) Vance’s comment was made after Stephanopoulos asked Vance about his comments on a 2021 podcast, where Vance said that if Trump is reelected in 2024, he would advise Trump to “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people,” according to ABC News, and then when the courts tried to stop Trump, he should “stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did, and say, ‘The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.’”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/george-stephanopoulos-shuts-down-interview-203847105.html
Already did, Boy. I'm as tall as I'm ever gonna be.Grow up, Boy.
If you can't answer a simple question asked of you... fine with me.If others want to play your silly, childish games with you...fine with me.
No you're not. You're hurling cuss words at me. You're very angry right now.I'm laughing at you...
The frustrations belong to you, dude. You can't even answer a simple question, and it angers you that I keep pointing that out.and your frustrations.
Please elaborate how Biden is defying the Supreme Court, I think you mispelt, Abbott.If Trump were to defy Supreme Court rulings, then he'd have get in line behind Biden and a number of other Presidents in history doing so...
You’re really damn old…”[FONT="]The first federal attempt to censor seditious speech occurred with the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 under President John Adams. These acts made it a federal crime to speak, write, or print criticisms of the government that were false, scandalous, or malicious.”[/FONT][FONT="]Jan 12, 2024[/FONT]I am old enough to remember when Americans were opposed to censorship.
Already did, Boy. I'm as tall as I'm ever gonna be.
If you can't answer a simple question asked of you... fine with me.
No you're not. You're hurling cuss words at me. You're very angry right now.
The frustrations belong to you, dude. You can't even answer a simple question, and it angers you that I keep pointing that out.
Aweeeee, Fwanky didn't like my response?!Only stupid people think that "growing up" is primarily about being tall.
Yet, you can't seem to find a way to do it.I can easily answer a simple question.
So my question is too complicated for you to handle, eh? And where are all of these additional questions coming from? I only asked you one question.Your questions, while coming from a simple person, are not simple question.
Now you can't even make up your mind as to whether or not the question exists. Again, there's only one question, so idk where you're finding all of these additional questions as they didn't come from me.They are pretend questions.
So my question is too complicated for you to handle, eh?And I imagine you sucker some people into playing your game. I am not one of them.
Your issue, not mine. Your anger is on full display.If it makes you better able to tolerate your sad life to think that I am angry right now...go for it. If you saw the smile on my face as I type these words, it would make you even sadder though.
Still cussing, eh?Suggestion: Don't use "cuss." You sound like a fucking childish hick. Use vulgarity, if you must. Or...just grow up.
You seem to be confusing my posts for your own. The frustration lies with you. That's why you're cussing in every single one of your posts. You're angry. You hate it that you're incapable of answering a single simple question without receiving programming from your mind masters.I am enjoying the frustration I see in your posts. Please keep posting...I'll keep enjoying.
Let me remind you of the question that I asked.
Which Sunday morning network news shows are you referring to, specifically?
Aweeeee, Fwanky didn't like my response?!![]()
Yet, you can't seem to find a way to do it.
So my question is too complicated for you to handle, eh? And where are all of these additional questions coming from? I only asked you one question.
Now you can't even make up your mind as to whether or not the question exists. Again, there's only one question, so idk where you're finding all of these additional questions as they didn't come from me.
So my question is too complicated for you to handle, eh?
Your issue, not mine. Your anger is on full display.
Still cussing, eh?
You seem to be confusing my posts for your own. The frustration lies with you. That's why you're cussing in every single one of your posts. You're angry.
You hate it that you're incapable of answering a single simple question without receiving programming from your mind masters.
Aweeeeee, BidenPwesident can't answer a simple question either..... how cute.you are too fucking stupid
Nah, you're quite angry right now. It's all too apparent. I love exposing people like you, so I'm laughing all the way to the bank.Actually, I loved it! Gave me a chance to respond about what stupid people do.
No you can't.I can answer a simple question.
Continued paradoxes. You can't seem to make up your mind as to whether there's one question or multiple questions, or whether the question(s) is(are) simple or complicated.I just won't answer yours,
... or are YOU too stupid to PROVIDE an explanation? C'mon... just give it a try...mostly because if someone does not know what the democratic experiment of America is...that person is too stupid to understand an explanation.
Irrelevant. You should be able to define your own terminology either way.And if the person does know what is meant by that, but is pretending...I will not play his/her game.
... says the person who cannot define his own terminology. What do you mean when you say "democratic experiment (of America)"?You lose.
Continued whining. Continued evasion. Continued claims of victory.Your question is a pretence...and I am getting a kick out of you trying, and failing, to get me to play your game.
You lose.
Okay, so I'll assume that you've now cleared your paradox about the number of questions and are sticking with it being one question from here on out.Okay, that one I will give you. I should not have pluralized that comment.
That one you win.
Continued whining. Continued evasion. Continued claims of victory.Nope...I'm just not willing to play your game.
You lose.
Continues lies. Continued projections. Continued anger. Continued evasion.Smile still on my face.
You lose on this one big time.
Ahhh...maybe you are a childish hick.
I'll resolve it that way.
You lose.
If it makes your sad life more worth living to think that shit...have at it. I still have the smile on my face...no anger. You cannot help that you are a hick...nor that you are a loser. It would make no sense for me to be angry at you for that.
Project much lately?
Aweeeeee, BidenPwesident can't answer a simple question either..... how cute.
Nah, you're quite angry right now. It's all too apparent. I love exposing people like you, so I'm laughing all the way to the bank.![]()
No you can't.
Continued paradoxes. You can't seem to make up your mind as to whether there's one question or multiple questions, or whether the question(s) is(are) simple or complicated.
Such paradoxes are all too common whenever people wish to be dishonest.
... or are YOU too stupid to PROVIDE an explanation? C'mon... just give it a try...
Irrelevant. You should be able to define your own terminology either way.
... says the person who cannot define his own terminology. What do you mean when you say "democratic experiment (of America)"?
Continued whining. Continued evasion. Continued claims of victory.
Okay, so I'll assume that you've now cleared your paradox about the number of questions and are sticking with it being one question from here on out.
Continued whining. Continued evasion. Continued claims of victory.
Continues lies. Continued projections. Continued anger. Continued evasion.
Yes, and that's one Sunday show (albeit one that promotes uber liberal viewpoints, thus not fitting with what you are claiming). Can you list some others?Did you notice what the thread title is?!
That you are, Boy!I'm a big cry baby who can't define the terminology that I parrot.
That you are, Boy!
Right again!I figured that you wouldn't let me get away with evading a simple question about what "democratic experiment" means.
I lose.