George Zimmerman Fled Angry Mob in Miami

^ Wait, what?

They couldn't use SYG in the case but could use it to prevent civil prosecution? I don't understand, I thought SYG was off the table.
Not at all. Zimmerman's defense team did not use it as a defense but it was included as a defense in the jury instructions by the judge. Since that was included a not guilty verdict, by Florida Law, makes Mr. Zimmerman immune from further prosecution the case, including civil prosecution. So in that respect SYG is not just a "self defense" defense but it also a form of legal immunity.
 
Aint that the truth....though understandable. It's hard to be objective on something as emotional as this.

Yet OJ was able to go about his business for many years without being hassled, even though he killed two whites. Why weren't there lynch mobs after him or people baying for his blood?
 
I still say a fix was in.
Anything is possible and had it been an all white male jury I would agree that there's a good chance that was the case....but it wasn't. I also think the evidence was pretty clear that reasonable doubt existed as to murder. Had Mr. Zimmerman been charged with negligent manslaughter or reckless endangerment or something to that affect and been found guilty he would have done at least ten years due to the aggravating circumstance that a gun was used. He would have also been open to civil suit as SYG would not be a defense to those charges and thus immunity would not have been involved had he been aquited. I believe that's the case, Jarod can correct me if I'm wrong.
 
He lost the civil case but it's a different standard of proof. In a criminal case the standard is reasonable doubt. In a civil case it's the preponderance of evidence which is a lower standard of proof than reasonable doubt.

I understand the difference but this comment threw me off: "Due to that, we don't know, for a fact, if OJ killed anyone."

There was strong DNA evidence and murderers have been convicted on circumstantial evidence.

"A large quantity blood was found at the Bundy estate and at the Rockingham estate. A trail of blood was found at the actual crime scene as well as in Simpson's white Bronco and at his house. The walk and the rear gate at the Bundy estate had blood from Simpson. This was determined by using genetic fingerprinting. The blood of Nicole Brown Simpson matched the bloodstains that were collected at the crime scene (Nicole's house) and at O.J.'s house."

http://www.bxscience.edu/publications/forensics../articles/dna/r-dna02.htm
 
Yet OJ was able to go about his business for many years without being hassled, even though he killed two whites. Why weren't there lynch mobs after him or people baying for his blood?
You obviously weren't paying attention. There were vast numbers of people braying for his hide after he was aquited. He was also successfully sued in civil court. As for his having killed two people you couldn't possibly know that for a fact. OJ was like 10 minutes away from an air tight alibi and the only evidence against him was circumstantial (forensic) which was grossly mishandled to the point it rendered it virtually useless. The LA police and coroners department completely bungled that case.
 
I understand the difference but this comment threw me off: "Due to that, we don't know, for a fact, if OJ killed anyone."

There was strong DNA evidence and murderers have been convicted on circumstantial evidence.

"A large quantity blood was found at the Bundy estate and at the Rockingham estate. A trail of blood was found at the actual crime scene as well as in Simpson's white Bronco and at his house. The walk and the rear gate at the Bundy estate had blood from Simpson. This was determined by using genetic fingerprinting. The blood of Nicole Brown Simpson matched the bloodstains that were collected at the crime scene (Nicole's house) and at O.J.'s house."

http://www.bxscience.edu/publications/forensics../articles/dna/r-dna02.htm
That's correct but there are also very stringent standards by which that evidence must be collected, handled, preserved, analyzed, tracked, etc, and in the OJ case that was completely botched. I used to do very similar environmental analytical work and there are very similar standards as that work is often used in court and must pass legal scrutiny. In the OJ case that was bungled badly in ways that were patently obvious to those who have done this type of work.
 
You obviously weren't paying attention. There were vast numbers of people braying for his hide after he was aquited. He was also successfully sued in civil court. As for his having killed two people you couldn't possibly know that for a fact. OJ was like 10 minutes away from an air tight alibi and the only evidence against him was circumstantial (forensic) which was grossly mishandled to the point it rendered it virtually useless. The LA police and coroners department completely bungled that case.

Yes I know that he was sued and it is you that are missing the point. I don't recall any angry mobs preventing him from going about his business. As for evidence there was overwhelming DNA samples all over the house and outside, the defence played the race card and managed to get away with it.
 
To paraphrase Ghandi....an eye for an eye and pretty soon everyone is blind. Zimmerman will have to answer to a higher power some day.

The prosecutors deserve a lot of criticism for over charging him with a very weak case. A lesser charge could have won a felon conviction. Put his ass away for a long time and left him open to civil charges.

The bar on that damn self defense law is just too damn high; what lower charge do you think they could have convicted Zimmerman on: stalking?
 
87% of Americans are not black so it stands to reason non-blacks commit more crimes than blacks.

According to the US Department of Justice, blacks accounted for 52.5% of homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, with whites 45.3% and Native Americans and Asians 2.2%. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks.[SUP][32][/SUP][SUP][33][/SUP]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
 
Yes I know that he was sued and it is you that are missing the point. I don't recall any angry mobs preventing him from going about his business. As for evidence there was overwhelming DNA samples all over the house and outside, the defence played the race card and managed to get away with it.
Except OJ did not have an a black jury. The facts are the LAPD screwed the pooch in the OJ case and the call of the race card is people believing what they want to and not the facts.
 
Back
Top