German Sprite-Banned in the US

Budweiser, by AB, sucks warm buttermilk through a crazy straw. I have, like gentleman Tom imbibed the real thing, from the Czech republic. It is great, almost as good as Pilsner Urquel from Pilsen, which is where ALL original golden pilsners originate. It is absolutely against the law to place rice, corn or any other homoerotic grain in bier in Germany. If you like that kind of shit you probably drink your coffee weak as tea, (American tea Tom) don't like mexican food cuz it's too hot, and don't want a woman that knows what she is doing in bed because it will only highlight that you don't.
 
Budweiser, by AB, sucks warm buttermilk through a crazy straw. I have, like gentleman Tom imbibed the real thing, from the Czech republic. It is great, almost as good as Pilsner Urquel from Pilsen, which is where ALL original golden pilsners originate. It is absolutely against the law to place rice, corn or any other homoerotic grain in bier in Germany. If you like that kind of shit you probably drink your coffee weak as tea, (American tea Tom) don't like mexican food cuz it's too hot, and don't want a woman that knows what she is doing in bed because it will only highlight that you don't.

I knew that people of discernment such as yourself and Mott would prefer the real thing. AHZ is a very peculiar fellow and apparently knows fuck all about beers as well.
 
I knew that people of discernment such as yourself and Mott would prefer the real thing. AHZ is a very peculiar fellow and apparently knows fuck all about beers as well.
I have to say I'll give credit where credit is due Tom. I would never claim Bud to be a great beer. I prefer a more full flavor profile then what Bud offers. Having said that, there is a time and a place for everything. For example, if I'm going to a party on a hot summer night and I'm in a mood to drink all night long some iced down Bud does have a smooth, refreshing drinkability that hits the spot. Now would I want to be served a Bud with my order of wienner schnitzel und pommel fritz? Not bloody likely, but there is a time and a place for a light beer like Bud. Another thing I do find amazing about Bud is they make a trillion bottles a year and that bottle of Bud you drank last year in LA taste remarkably consistent with the Bud you drank last night in Charlotte. That is, the consistency in which they make such a vast amount of product over such a vast geographical region is truly a wonder of modern manufacturing and logistics.
 
I have to say I'll give credit where credit is due Tom. I would never claim Bud to be a great beer. I prefer a more full flavor profile then what Bud offers. Having said that, there is a time and a place for everything. For example, if I'm going to a party on a hot summer night and I'm in a mood to drink all night long some iced down Bud does have a smooth, refreshing drinkability that hits the spot. Now would I want to be served a Bud with my order of wienner schnitzel und pommel fritz? Not bloody likely, but there is a time and a place for a light beer like Bud. Another thing I do find amazing about Bud is they make a trillion bottles a year and that bottle of Bud you drank last year in LA taste remarkably consistent with the Bud you drank last night in Charlotte. That is, the consistency in which they make such a vast amount of product over such a vast geographical region is truly a wonder of modern manufacturing and logistics.

I not sure who you are trying to convince, you or me? It still tastes like pasteurised homogenised horse piss to me. Good old Wiki has it right as usual.

Rice gained popularity in the domestic brewing market during World War II due to grain rationing on the home-front. Most breweries were unable to afford the necessary amounts of barley required for production and so began using rice as a filler. This also had the added benefit of lightening the flavor of beer making it more appealing to the new female workforce. After the war, the process was not changed and as a result the style changed as a whole, losing many of the subtle flavors that had characterized the style.

Some "premium" beers made in this style use only barley malt, with no corn or rice at all, though they are considered more or less the same style. Modern American brewed lagers are sometimes criticized as being bland or watery.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_the_United_States"]Beer in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Pint_of_beer.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d3/Pint_of_beer.jpg/150px-Pint_of_beer.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@en/thumb/d/d3/Pint_of_beer.jpg/150px-Pint_of_beer.jpg[/ame]
 
Last edited:
I not sure who you are trying to convince, you or me? It still tastes like pasteurised homogenised horse piss to me. Good old Wiki has it right as usual.

Rice gained popularity in the domestic brewing market during World War II due to grain rationing on the home-front. Most breweries were unable to afford the necessary amounts of barley required for production and so began using rice as a filler. This also had the added benefit of lightening the flavor of beer making it more appealing to the new female workforce. After the war, the process was not changed and as a result the style changed as a whole, losing many of the subtle flavors that had characterized the style.

Some "premium" beers made in this style use only barley malt, with no corn or rice at all, though they are considered more or less the same style. Modern American brewed lagers are sometimes criticized as being bland or watery.

Beer in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bland or watery, reminds me of the joke about a British beer which has thankfully disappeared.

Q: Why is Watneys Red Barrel like making love in a punt?

A: Because they are both fucking close to water!!
 
Back
Top