I particularly like the part where Mueller states they felt they had enough information about Trump and his actions so they felt they wouldn't get anything more by subpoenaing him. What do you think Mueller will say his conclusions were that made him reach that decision? Does he think there is enough circumstantial evidence to show Trump had intent in obstructing justice. He lays out how circumstantial evidence is the normal way to prove obstruction.
If Mueller’s report gave the Democrats in congress enough circumstantial evidence to impeach Trump, then why are the democrats continuing the investigation? Why aren’t they simply passing articles of impeachment, and getting on with the show? I’ll give you two reasons, One, the congressional Democrats know there’s two sides to every accusation/argument, & the evidence for the Trump team that proves there was no obstruction was never presented by Mueller, & the Senate is controlled by Republicans and the odds anybody could present enough of your circumstantial evidence to remove Trump is zero.
The problem you have Robo is you haven't read the report and you somehow think there is some smoking gun in the report that can prove Mueller was biased.
Your problem is you haven’t read all of it, you simply googled it up when challenged. You never read all 400 pages and you’re still saying it says what you can’t produce it says, you produce your own biased opinions about what it’s saying.
I don’t need to read it, it’s not my evidence of anything. I suspect it’s simply a Mueller & his gang of swamp rat rabid mad junkyard dog democrat Hillary supporters fallacious dossier designed to smear Trump with horseshit for the lack of an actual crime. I’ll let the end results of all of it speak for what it’s really worth.
As for the smoking gun of Mueller’s bias, it’s perfectly evident to me what a swamp skunk Never Trumper Muller’s rabid bias was from the get-go, just judging by the swamp skunk gang of rabid mad junkyard dog democrat lawyers he hired to frame Trump.
That isn't the case at all. You will be choking on your popcorn if the questions you want asked are actually asked and Mueller is allowed to answer because the answers are already there and most of the country doesn't realize that yet.
Those questions will be ask & I’m rounding up my popcorn with glee to hear the son-of-a-bitch’s answers.
The actual evidence in the report is pretty damning as laid out. If this evidence existed against Obama I would be calling for his impeachment. If half of what is there existed against Obama you would be calling for his impeachment.
I think there might just be plenty of evidence about Obama on the horizon about to create an atomic explosion, if the Swamp can’t find a way to cover it up. I think there’s really enough there to send Obama, Hillary and half of the Obama administration to the slammer. I have actually little confidence that even Barr will allow it to actually go that far. He’s an old establishment swamp Republican & I suspect his guts to buck the swamp to that extent.
No matter really, I’m 83 & time is running out for me. I’m well aware of the D.C. Swamp bastards corruption. I don’t really expect any real justice from the swamp. If Barr produces some I’ll give him credit for whatever balls he does muster up. If I were him, I’d hire more body guards and buy a 45 caliber magnum handgun & walk backwards in the swamp to protect against the back stabbers.
