gfm7175's "battle for senate" and "battle for house" projections

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Actually, bullshit CAN be evidence.


And that's your opinion, but that doesn't change the truth that evidence has indeed been presented to you.


... because it IS evidence. You seem to be unaware of what evidence is.


Illiteracy. Questions end with a question mark, not a period.

RQAA. You continue to ask the same question over and over again although it has already been answered for you countless times over the last roughly two years.


RQAA.

I continue to ask the same question so you can reveal to Dutch that you are Sybil.

You clearly have not presented any evidence and your refusal to do so speaks volumes as to the quality of your "evidence." RQAA is not evidence. It is deflection and will always be deflection.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Chanting.

You also seem completely unaware of what a fallacy fallacy is.

Wow, Sybil forgot which identity she was using.

 

[gfm7175]

Pennsylvania Senate - Oz vs. Fetterman

Fetterman 49, Oz 44

Fetterman +5

Did you know that R's can still win control of the Senate without winning PA?
Did you know that polls are largely meaningless (and are typically just Demonkkkrat propaganda)??

The only public pollster with a decent track record to poll the PA race to date has been Trafalgar and they show that it could go either way. (they had a Fetterman +4 result mid-August and a narrowed Fetterman +2 result mid-September).

 

[Into the Night]

Bullshit isn't evidence. And what you have presented is bullshit while continuing to claim it is evidence.
So.. what evidence do you have of massive fraud in the election. Give us a hint as to what it is. Then we can all see if it is bullshit or evidence.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

I continue to ask the same question so you can reveal to Dutch that you are Sybil.

This leads me to believe you and Dutch are socks. Sybil isn't here. She exists only in your head.

You clearly have not presented any evidence

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

and your refusal to do so

He didn't. Neither have I. We have both presented you with quite a bit of evidence. So have others.

speaks volumes as to the quality of your "evidence."

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

RQAA is not evidence.

Strawman fallacy. Semantics fallacy.

It is deflection and will always be deflection.

Strawman fallacy. Semantics fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.

Redefinition fallacy. Denial of logic. No argument presented. Insult fallacy. Trolling.

 

[gfm7175]

I continue to ask the same question so you can reveal to Dutch that you are Sybil.

No, you continue to ask it because trolling is all you have. I am not Sybil (I have only ever used gfm7175 as a username).

You clearly have not presented any evidence and your refusal to do so speaks volumes as to the quality of your "evidence." RQAA is not evidence. It is deflection and will always be deflection.

Continued denial of the evidence presented to you. You can't pretend its existence away, dude. This is not Mr. Rodgers' Neighborhood. This is not the Land of Make Believe.

Do you have anything to say about the thread topic?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.


RQAA is not evidence. It is deflection and will always be deflection.

 

[gfm7175]

Wow, Sybil forgot which identity she was using.

There is no Sybil on JPP, dude...... Now you're having the same hallucinations that Dutch Uncle has??? hahahaha TOO FUNNY!!

 

[LurchAddams]

No, you continue to ask it because trolling is all you have. I am not Sybil (I have only ever used gfm7175 as a username).


Continued denial of the evidence presented to you. You can't pretend its existence away, dude. This is not Mr. Rodgers' Neighborhood. This is not the Land of Make Believe.

Do you have anything to say about the thread topic?

Hey, did you happen to catch Biden's new approval rating? He's at 47 and rising. Care to guess what your cult leader, trump's current approval rating is?

LOL.

Now, why is this important? As Biden's approval rises, he becomes a "player" who can actually endorse candidates and lead the party into more of a majority.

This is your worst nightmare, darling. Would you care for a hug?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

No, you continue to ask it because trolling is all you have. I am not Sybil (I have only ever used gfm7175 as a username).


Continued denial of the evidence presented to you. You can't pretend its existence away, dude. This is not Mr. Rodgers' Neighborhood. This is not the Land of Make Believe.

Do you have anything to say about the thread topic?

RQAA is not evidence. It is deflection and will always be deflection.

If you aren't Sybil then you clearly share a brain with Into the Night and somehow neither of you can find it.

As to the topic of the thread, the likelihood of the GOP taking the Senate is very small and likely to get smaller when Walker debates in GA.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

There is no Sybil on JPP, dude...... Now you're having the same hallucinations that Dutch Uncle has??? hahahaha TOO FUNNY!!

It isn't an hallucination when your posts are identical to other posters and you use the same obscure references that they do.

 

[Into the Night]

Chanting.

You also seem completely unaware of what a fallacy fallacy is.

He doesn't even know what a fallacy is. Why would you expect him to know what a fallacy fallacy is?? He utterly denies logic. He utterly discards the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of the various States. I've seen him deny mathematics and several theories of science as well. He even denies engineering. He is strictly a fundamentalist religious idiot.

Sanders also claims to be an expert on psychiatry. He also is hallucinating that there is a Sybil to talk to. This is the same as Dutch. In my opinion they are socks of each other. Probably why both of them claim everyone that disagrees with them to be socks. It's an inversion.

 

[gfm7175]

Hey, did you happen to catch Biden's new approval rating? He's at 47 and rising.

Care to guess what your cult leader, trump's current approval rating is?

Much higher than Biden's.

LOL.

Now, why is this important? As Biden's approval rises, he becomes a "player" who can actually endorse candidates and lead the party into more of a majority.

This is your worst nightmare, darling. Would you care for a hug?

 

[LurchAddams]

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.


RQAA is not evidence. It is deflection and will always be deflection.

No kidding. RQAA is the moron's answer whenever I ask him to show evidence of 2020 fraud. He's just a gadfly, irritating people here. I think, in his mind, his trolling us, is doing a service to the MAGA society? He won't debate - he can't. So I figure he feels that online trolling is "doing a good deed"?

I'll probably never figure him out - which bothers me because I hate not knowing shit.

 

[LurchAddams]

There is no Sybil on JPP, dude...... Now you're having the same hallucinations that Dutch Uncle has??? hahahaha TOO FUNNY!!

Can we please get back to the subject about how you're going to lose the Senate please? No one cares about all your socks, of which we're sure you have thousands.

Thank you!

 

[gfm7175]

RQAA is not evidence.

Right. It is noting that you keep asking for something that has already been presented to you.

It is deflection and will always be deflection.

Nope. It is a notation that you continue to ask the same question over and over and over and over and over that has already been answered over and over and over and over and over...

If you aren't Sybil

I am not Sybil. I am gfm7175.

then you clearly share a brain with Into the Night

Nope. I don't share a brain with anybody. I do agree with a lot of what he says though. We both also accept logic, science, mathematics, history, and economics as valid sources.

and somehow neither of you can find it.

[1] gfm7175 and ITN share a brain.
[2] gfm7175 and ITN can't find said brain.

Which is it?

As to the topic of the thread, the likelihood of the GOP taking the Senate is very small and likely to get smaller when Walker debates in GA.

You're TOO FUNNY sometimes...

 

[LurchAddams]

Much higher than Biden's.

Oh? You haven't heard then? Tsk, tsk. I guess I'll just let you find the new polls yourself. I was going to be nice and post them for you, but since you're being such a grumpy Geraldine, I'm not gonna now.

You really need to mend your ways, Sweetie.

 

[Into the Night]

No kidding. RQAA is the moron's answer whenever I ask him to show evidence of 2020 fraud.

It's already been shown to you idiot. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

He's just a gadfly, irritating people here.

You are describing yourself.

I think, in his mind, his trolling us,

You are describing yourself.

is doing a service to the MAGA society?

So you don't want to make America Great again. Gotit.

He won't debate - he can't.

You aren't debating. You are presenting no arguments. Insults are not arguments.

So I figure he feels that online trolling is "doing a good deed"?

Psychoquackery.

I'll probably never figure him out - which bothers me because I hate not knowing shit.

Then learn. You and only you are responsible for your own illiteracy.

 

[Into the Night]

Oh? You haven't heard then? Tsk, tsk. I guess I'll just let you find the new polls yourself. I was going to be nice and post them for you, but since you're being such a grumpy Geraldine, I'm not gonna now.

You really need to mend your ways, Sweetie.

Polls don't mean anything, dumbass. Discard of mathematics.