GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

Wow, all the world's "human-released-CO2" can be accurately measured?! :whoa:

YOu don't need to worry your tiny little head about it. It probably requires some understanding of math and statistics and those aren't your areas as we saw with your failure to use the STefan-Boltzmann equation to disprove global warming.
 

And gfm is STILL showing us that they don't know what they are talking about.

If gfm had ANYTHING they'd be able to trot it out, but all they ever do is dance around and run away like an enormous dribbling puss.


You are hilarious! Talk about linear algebra next! Then try to make us think you know quantum as well. Next thing you know you'll be up there with Cypress in the BIG BRAIN category! LOLOLOLOL
 
LOL. You've been seen. Everyone knows now that you ain't got nothin'. You can't even do a simple calc with S-B let alone use it to disprove global warming. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
LOL. You've been seen. Everyone knows now that you ain't got nothin'. You can't even accurately describe what S-B calculates let alone use it to prove global warming.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
 
And gfm is STILL showing us that they don't know what they are talking about.

If gfm had ANYTHING they'd be able to trot it out, but all they ever do is dance around and run away like an enormous dribbling puss.
This is YOUR issue, not mine.
You are hilarious! Talk about linear algebra next! Then try to make us think you know quantum as well. Next thing you know you'll be up there with Cypress in the BIG BRAIN category! LOLOLOLOL
Is anybody buying into your charade of "superior intellect"?
 
I'm not saying physics don't apply always.
Well, you aren't saying it now that I pointed out how stupid it was for you to have said it.

I'm asking how you know it's being applied correctly.
There is no such thing as incorrectly applying science that always applies. You have to apply it, always ... and there is no incorrect way to apply it because science because it is science and there is only one way to apply it, and that is by applying it. Science isn't subjective and isn't some sort of technique.

Remind me again why you are involved in this discussion?
 
And gfm is STILL showing us that they don't know what they are talking about.
When did gfm7175 become a plural? Did that happen when he lynched you like he was an academic army?

If gfm had ANYTHING they'd be able to trot it out,
Too funny! You are the one affirmatively asserting your WACKY Global Warming religion that you cannot support in any way. You are the one who bears the full burden to support your gibberish. Neither gfm7175 nor anyone else is required to "trot out" anything in particular. gfm7175 isn't affirmatively claiming anything; as such, there is nothing for him to support. The full burden of support falls squarely on your shoulders, and thus far, you have provided zip. Why am I the first person to teach you this?

How did gfm7175 so astutely summarize your argument? Was it "blah, blah, blah, blah" ? Yes, I think that was it. I will refer to this as the gfm7175 encapsulation; it captures the true essence of your claims. So when were you planning on supporting your argument?

You are hilarious! Talk about linear algebra next!
What do you need for me to teach you now? What the "=" means?

Then try to make us think you know quantum as well.
I can teach you that as well, given sufficient time considering your current acumen.
 
When did gfm7175 become a plural? Did that happen when he lynched you like he was an academic army?


Too funny! You are the one affirmatively asserting your WACKY Global Warming religion that you cannot support in any way. You are the one who bears the full burden to support your gibberish. Neither gfm7175 nor anyone else is required to "trot out" anything in particular. gfm7175 isn't affirmatively claiming anything; as such, there is nothing for him to support. The full burden of support falls squarely on your shoulders, and thus far, you have provided zip. Why am I the first person to teach you this?

How did gfm7175 so astutely summarize your argument? Was it "blah, blah, blah, blah" ? Yes, I think that was it. I will refer to this as the gfm7175 encapsulation; it captures the true essence of your claims. So when were you planning on supporting your argument?


What do you need for me to teach you now? What the "=" means?


I can teach you that as well, given sufficient time considering your current acumen.


All that talk and not one single mathematical discussion. Funny.

Numbers are involved. Try again, Cletus.
 
No one has ever made such an argument.
This is correct insofar as Global Warming is an unfalsifiable religion. Stating that there is no Global Warming is akin to stating that there is no Christian God, i.e. cannot be shown to exist or to not exist. The observation is that no one has ever shown any Global Warming and that no rational adult has any rational basis for believing in that religion. This leads us to ...

Anyone with even half a brain should know that the earth has been in a warming trend for ten thousand years.
Nope. This has never been shown. No rational adult has any rational basis for believing in this particular religious doctrine.
 
BTW, my OP still stands... nobody has yet to explain to me how it is possible for everywhere on Earth to be "warming twice as fast as" everywhere else on Earth. Maybe @Daylight63 wants to take a stab at it?? What about @ZenMode ??

You claimed Stefan-Boltzmann could be used to debunk anthropogenic global climate change. You have yet to follow through.



Typical. I've seen losers like you all over the place.
 
Not in English. "He" and "his" is used when the gender is unknown. You really should get your money back from your negligent deaf studies program.

You should learn language changes. It is now perfectly acceptable to use they/them in a singular aspect.

Language grows ORGANICALLY which means things change over time without anyone being in control. After a while there's a new rule.

Keep up.

"The Associated Press Stylebook, as of 2017, recommends: "they/them/their is acceptable in limited cases as a singular and-or gender-neutral pronoun, when alternative wording is overly awkward or clumsy. "
 
I just did some more interesting Google searches:

1) list of countries warming below global average This link, in the very convenient "AI overview" section at the top, informs me that Sweden is one of the countries that is warming below the global average. It tells me that this is due to their strict adherence to the required rituals of the Global Warming faith.

2) Sweden warming twice as fast as This link, in the very convenient "AI overview" section at the top, informs me that Sweden is NOT warming below the global average, but is rather actually warming twice as fast as the global average. Sooooooo which "AI overview" is the correct one? ... or maybe they're BOTH wrong??

Then there's THIS little nugget...

3) list of countries warming below the global average This link uses the exact same wording as link #1, except I added in the word "the" between the words 'below' and 'global'. Here, within the very convenient "AI overview" section, I am informed that it is "difficult" to provide a definitive list of countries warming below the global average.

I wonder if that is because there supposedly AREN'T any countries that are warming below the global average... because every country is supposedly warming TWICE AS FAST AS the global average... because that's the nonsensical kind of BS that the Global Warming faith loves to preach in order to fear monger the gullible masses...
 
Back
Top