GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

[Into the Night]

I didn't try to redefine it. I asked how "follow the science" would be applied in everyday life.

I really think that English might be your second language...

Inversion fallacy.

IBDaMann , who seems to at least have a butter understanding of the English language than you do, has just given up because he can't explain how "follow the science" would be applied.

RQAA.

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy.

RQAA.

Nice try, Captain Dishonest.

No word games allowed.

Better luck next time.

An intellectually honest person would ask themselves why they have to constantly concede, rather than engage in discussion and answer questions.

If you could actually defend your positions, all of this ridiculous tap dancing wouldn't be necessary. That being said, I have no problem continually exposing you as the dishonest person you are.

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy.

RQAA.

 

[ZenMode]

Math is not an opinion, Void. Denying your own posts never works.

 

[ZenMode]

Denying our own posts never works.

 

[ZenMode]

Denying your own posts never works.

 

[IBDaMann]

So, again..... how is that applied in everyday life? Do I trust, for example, my doctor or do I "trust the science"?

You are repeating a question that I just answered twice. I couldn't have been any clearer or more straightforward, but you nonetheless do not have the cognitive wherewithal to understand the answer.

You are going to have to specify what part(s) of my answer you are failing to understand. Go back to my first response to your really stupid question.

 

[ZenMode]

You are repeating a question that I just answered twice. I couldn't have been any clearer or more straightforward, but you nonetheless do not have the cognitive wherewithal to understand the answer.

You are going to have to specify what part(s) of my answer you are failing to understand. Go back to my first response to your really stupid question.

"You are going to have to specify what part(s) of my answer you are failing to understand."

The part where you don't understand the difference between a response and an answer.

 

[Into the Night]

Nice try, Captain Dishonest.

No word games allowed.

Better luck next time.

An intellectually honest person would ask themselves why they have to constantly concede, rather than engage in discussion and answer questions.

If you could actually defend your positions, all of this ridiculous tap dancing wouldn't be necessary. That being said, I have no problem continually exposing you as the dishonest person you are.

Inversion fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

"You are going to have to specify what part(s) of my answer you are failing to understand."

The part where you don't understand the difference between a response and an answer.

RQAA