global warming naysayers miss the point...again!

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - global warming naysayers miss the point...again!

And to put an end to your scrambling...SO2 is a by-product of our manufacturing and transportation industry via smokestacks and car/plane exhausts. Do the research if you doubt me. So back to square one.....you have jets, cars, smokestacks all over the globe going 24/7, and they've been doing that for DECADES. Volcanoes world wide are nowhere near that frequency.

My original corrections of your compadre(s) stands.

You left out the word "SOME", for your referral to jets, cars, etc.

Obviously, you refuse to acknowledge my factually proving you wrong on all your challenges and accusations here, so now you try to dodge. But of course, YOU can prove that there's been a world wide installation of filtration systems in cars and planes that filters out SO2 from the exhaust, right? If not, your dodge is nullified and not worth further contemplation despite your impending attempts to justify it. Nor is your impending repeat of all previous disproved assertions/accusations/claims here. So unless you can meet a simple burden of proof, I'd say we're done here.
 
You really are a fucking idiot. Not once have you answered the questions. Your pretending that somehow YOU know that ANWR is not economically viable somehow answers the questions I posed to you (which again for the record, were not about ANWR, but about drilling in GENERAL)

Your feeble attempts to make this about ANWR just show that you want to run like a fucking coward from the discussion. Like I said, you are another of the flat earth lemmings. You do not have the capacity to think for yourself.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Typical neocon.....deny the proof, ignore the facts, repeat the questions add nauseum, wave the flag.

Pay attention, because I'm not going to repeat myself: ANWR IS NOT ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE GIVEN IT'S ESTIMATED PRODUCTION BALANCED AGAINST CURRENT AND PROJECTED CONSUMPTION RATES, THE TEMPORARY JOBS IT WOULD PRODUCE FOR A MINUTE PORTION OF THE LOCAL POPULATION, AND THE DAMAGE IT WOULD DO TO THE ECO-STRUCTURE (yeah, humans and animals need clean water and fresh air). ANWR PRODUCTION WOULD EASILY BE OFFSET BY FOREIGN PRODUCTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET. When all is said and done, it's a decade long investment for less than 5 years worth of oil for the US population.

AND REMEMBER, THIS IS ALL GUESS WORK AND ESTIMATES THAT EVERYTHING GOES ACCORDING TO PLAN. As my link shows, the concerns that this might not work out as planned weigh heavily against the projected gains...which are not much when properly analyzed.

"Drill baby drill" is the war cry of the willfully ignorant dupes of the oil companies, who will take their profits and leave a hole in the ground, ghost town economy and damaged ecology that they are reluctant to be fully accountable for, as they are with the Exxon Valdez situation.

But do carry on repeating this bilge ad nauseum if it helps you sleep at night.


Wail like the insipidly stubborn, willfully ignorant neocon that you are! You did EXACTLY as I predicted....typical neocon wussy! Your'e done!
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Typical neocon.....deny the proof, ignore the facts, repeat the questions add nauseum, wave the flag.

Pay attention, because I'm not going to repeat myself: ANWR IS NOT ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE GIVEN IT'S ESTIMATED PRODUCTION BALANCED AGAINST CURRENT AND PROJECTED CONSUMPTION RATES, THE TEMPORARY JOBS IT WOULD PRODUCE FOR A MINUTE PORTION OF THE LOCAL POPULATION, AND THE DAMAGE IT WOULD DO TO THE ECO-STRUCTURE (yeah, humans and animals need clean water and fresh air). ANWR PRODUCTION WOULD EASILY BE OFFSET BY FOREIGN PRODUCTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET. When all is said and done, it's a decade long investment for less than 5 years worth of oil for the US population.

AND REMEMBER, THIS IS ALL GUESS WORK AND ESTIMATES THAT EVERYTHING GOES ACCORDING TO PLAN. As my link shows, the concerns that this might not work out as planned weigh heavily against the projected gains...which are not much when properly analyzed.

"Drill baby drill" is the war cry of the willfully ignorant dupes of the oil companies, who will take their profits and leave a hole in the ground, ghost town economy and damaged ecology that they are reluctant to be fully accountable for, as they are with the Exxon Valdez situation.

But do carry on repeating this bilge ad nauseum if it helps you sleep at night.


Wail like the insipidly stubborn, willfully ignorant neocon that you are! You did EXACTLY as I predicted....typical neocon wussy! Your'e done!

You really are a fucking idiot. Not once have you answered the questions. Your pretending that somehow YOU know that ANWR is not economically viable somehow answers the questions I posed to you (which again for the record, were not about ANWR, but about drilling in GENERAL)

Your feeble attempts to make this about ANWR just show that you want to run like a fucking coward from the discussion. Like I said, you are another of the flat earth lemmings. You do not have the capacity to think for yourself.
 
As I stated and YOU CONTINUE TO DUCK ANSWERING....

DO WE OR DO WE NOT HAVE GREATER CONTROL OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS OF OIL PRODUCED IN THE U.S.A. vs. THE OIL PRODUCED IN OTHER COUNTRIES?????????????

DO WE OR DO WE NOT CREATE JOBS FOR U.S. CITIZENS IF WE KEEP THE OIL PRODUCTION HERE vs. OVERSEAS?

DO WE OR DO WE NOT IMPROVE THE TRADE DEFICIT BY DRILLING OUR OWN OIL AND NAT GAS?

DOES IT OR DOES IT NOT IMPROVE OUR ECONOMY TO KEEP THE MONEY HERE vs. SENDING IT OVERSEAS?

DO WE OR DO WE NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO TAX THE OIL PRODUCTION HERE IN THE U.S.?

CAN WE OR CAN WE NOT USE THOSE TAXES TO IMPROVE OUR INFRASTRUCTURE AND INCREASE R&D FOR CLEAN AND ALT ENERGY?
 
so... why is it you feel the need to continue to try and change the subject to ANWR?

Why can you not answer such simple questions Taichi? Is it because your masters haven't provided you with your kool aid induced bullshit yet?
 
Back
Top