Tinkerpeach
New member
In Spirit ,but wasn't Jesus in the flesh a new incarnation of YHWH?
No
In Spirit ,but wasn't Jesus in the flesh a new incarnation of YHWH?
Another Christian suicidal super ego sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming schizoid behavioral disorder of "man is God" as "Christ existed before God" in that Christiananality pedophilia Peter Principle pyramid scheme like "50 Ways To Leave Your Lover" in that survival of the fittest fascists tradition....
You should stock up on sunscreen, I hear Hell is kind of hot
You should stock up on sunscreen, I hear Hell is kind of hot
The more I think about the Christian story the less meaningful it is.
My understanding is that Jesus had a basic idea that he was probably going to be dying so that humanity could be saved, and that he felt it might be best to not leave a widow.
I don't even think Jesus kept the Sabbath, and he wasn't hung up on ritual purity laws. He hung out with prostitutes
"The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath".......
But the thing I was actually asking was, since Jesus said he was NOT here to change the law...the fact that he did means something.
So I am wondering what THAT tells us.
it tells us that his sacrifice was sufficient for all humanity and for all eternity.......
Thanks for admitting you lied your fat ass off about supposedly reading the bible cover to cover. You thought Romans was a record of what Jesus said and did, which nobody with a working knowledge of the NT would claim
I'm not always irrelevant, but when I am I post at JPP
in summary, unbelievers choose to believe Jesus said nothing about everything they are in favor of......
2 Timothy 3:16-17
16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
^^ Not a record of the words and sayings of Jesus, which was the topic under discussion.
You're asking nonbelievers, agnostics, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Daoists, Jews to simply take it on faith, to take your word for it, that the author of Timothy 2 is channeling the words of Jesus.
That's not the way it works. You have to find words of Jesus in the gospels in which he complains about gays.
You're asking nonbelievers, agnostics, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Daoists, Jews to simply take it on faith, .
not really.....we're asking you to fuck off and decide what your own gods have said.......we already know what ours has.....
not really.....we're asking you to fuck off and decide what your own gods have said.......we already know what ours has.....
not really.....we're asking you to fuck off and decide what your own gods have said.......we already know what ours has.....