Of course you should; that way you don't have to keep proving you're an uninformed dunce by avoiding the thread topic. I might use it more often just to give you dullards something to do with your pathetic lives. LMAO
God's Work
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.2
- Start date
Of course you should; that way you don't have to keep proving you're an uninformed dunce by avoiding the thread topic. I might use it more often just to give you dullards something to do with your pathetic lives. LMAO
Whoa!! LMAO
With dunces like you, it is all interchangeable depending on what moronic talking point you decide you spam the forum with. One thing we can be certain of, you won’t begin to engage in honest debate; that would require effort and facts. Two things you seldom show any desire for.
thus
/T͟Həs/
adverb
literaryformal
adverb: thus
1. as a result or consequence of this; therefore.
"Burke knocked out Byrne, thus becoming champion"
synonyms: consequently, as a consequence, in consequence, thereby, so, that being so, therefore, ergo, accordingly, hence, as a result, for that reason, ipso facto, because of that, on that account More
"the studio handled production, thus cutting its costs"
2. in the manner now being indicated or exemplified; in this way.
"she phoned Susan, and while she was thus engaged, Charles summoned the doctor"
/T͟Həs/
adverb
literaryformal
adverb: thus
1. as a result or consequence of this; therefore.
"Burke knocked out Byrne, thus becoming champion"
synonyms: consequently, as a consequence, in consequence, thereby, so, that being so, therefore, ergo, accordingly, hence, as a result, for that reason, ipso facto, because of that, on that account More
"the studio handled production, thus cutting its costs"
2. in the manner now being indicated or exemplified; in this way.
"she phoned Susan, and while she was thus engaged, Charles summoned the doctor"
There are several other references where Bush indicates he is on a mission, doing the will of God, this quote is hearsay, but along with all the other statements he has made about himself, his faith and his run for the Presidency, and God, he probably truly did say it, and he truly believed he was doing God's will.
Politicians use god references to give people that warm fuzzy feeling that everything we do has god's seal of approval.
I don't know if those two Muslim's lie, but Scott McClellan has been caught in a few.
It is a debate forum with similar rules; if you are going to make a claim, you are required to back it up with facts. Claiming that hearsay from Palestinian terrorist leaders is factual support is not just stupid, it is painfully retarded.
You might want to read up on those "hearsay" rules. But again, most of the pabulum you dish out here is anecdotal and hearsay and seldom contains anything that could be mistaken as substance or factual.
Sorry Merlin....it says only what it says....
It is quite stunning the levels of stupidity leftists are willing to stoop to in order to cling to their closed minded, hate filled, ignorant ideological views.
I'm simply saying that the Constitution declared that the legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.
This is why its called the "Separation clause". The action that the clause calls for is separation, not establishment. That is why its called the separation clause.
This is why its called the "Separation clause". The action that the clause calls for is separation, not establishment. That is why its called the separation clause.
Lol, rhetorical question, right!
As has President Obama.....more than a few....
Some admissible evidence is hearsay. Not all hearsay is admissible evidence.
Do you understand the difference between the above two statements?
BTW, this forum has rules for debate? Really? Where are they?
Is that what I typed you dishonest dunce? Are you trying to claim you know what Jefferson would say on this forum about the ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE?
Do you comprehend how stupid you look; or do you want to continue removing any doubt?
LMAO; this is your brain on Obama Kool=Aid. Don't drink the Kool-Aid.
Yes I know what you are trying to say; and it doesn't sound any less stupid no matter how many times you type it.
So anyone who wrote something like that sounds stupid to you?
Well at least I am in good company.
REALLY? That's a fascinating claim. How did you arrive at that; because you say so?
Let's look up what the two words mean because words apparently have no meaning to you.
es·tab·lish·ment [ih-stab-lish-muhnt] noun
1. the act or an instance of establishing.
2. the state or fact of being established.
3. something established; a constituted order or system.
4. ( often initial capital letter ) the existing power structure in society; the dominant groups in society and their customs or institutions; institutional authority (usually preceded by the ): The Establishment believes exploring outer space is worth any tax money spent.
5. ( often initial capital letter ) the dominant group in a field of endeavor, organization, etc. (usually preceded by the ): the literary Establishment.
sep·a·ra·tion [sep-uh-rey-shuhn] noun
1. an act or instance of separating or the state of being separated.
2. a place, line, or point of parting.
3. a gap, hole, rent, or the like.
4. something that separates or divides.
5. Law.
a. cessation of conjugal cohabitation, as by mutual consent.
b. judicial separation.
Sorry dunce; the only similarity is that they are both nouns.
This being the third (or hundredth depending on which forum) time you typed this doesn't make it look any less stupid or truthful.
Can't help yourself can you shit-for-brains?
I never claimed the word Establishment is synonymous with the word Separation, did I? I claimed that the Constitution declared that the legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.