Good News

Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
So, then guilty. He goes on to argue that abolition violated the religious liberty of slave owners.

Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild & melting influence of Christianity, than the storms & tempests of fiery Controversy. This influence though slow, is sure. The doctrines & miracles of our Saviour have required nearly two thousand years, to Convert but a small part of the human race, & even among Christian nations, what gross errors still exist! While we see the Course of the final abolition of human Slavery is onward, & we give it the aid of our prayers & all justifiable means in our power, we must leave the progress as well as the result in his hands who sees the end; who Chooses to work by slow influences; & with whom two thousand years are but as a Single day. Although the Abolitionist must know this, & must See that he has neither the right or power of operating except by moral means & suasion, & if he means well to the slave, he must not Create angry feelings in the Master; that although he may not approve the mode which it pleases Providence to accomplish its purposes, the result will nevertheless be the same; that the reasons he gives for interference in what he has no Concern, holds good for every kind of interference with our neighbors when we disapprove their Conduct; Still I fear he will persevere in his evil Course. Is it not strange that the descendants of those pilgrim fathers who Crossed the Atlantic to preserve their own freedom of opinion, have always proved themselves intolerant of the Spiritual liberty of others?


Disgusting.
Click to expand...

One of the first things they tell you when studying history is not to use present values to interpret the past. Stick to being a propagandist for Monsanto.
 
Dantès said:
Did you get this shit from tommy and his backdoor PM bullshit? And if you were told this shit in a PM you can't use it on this fucking board can you? According to Damo things said in PMs cannot be said on this board. So exactly where did you get the information that she ever met me? Where did you get it scumbag?
Click to expand...

I already told you no; I don't even know who this "Tommy" is and people rarely PM me because I really don't give a shit about the vagina man drama that erupts in here.

But I must have hit a nerve of truth here for you to get your vagina man panties in such a bunch here.

You and Darla are such pathetic dunces. It doesn't occur to you twits that everything you post, even if it gets deleted, ends up in people's e-Mail.

Yes, you and Snarla really are THAT stupid and THAT pathetic. You're like a couple of spoiled brat children running around the playground screeching about someone stealing your candy after you gave it away.

Dunce.
 
Dantès said:
You've been spreading a lot of illicit rumors haven't you washer woman. Your shit is getting raggedy tommy, it is getting damn raggedy.
Click to expand...

So tell us whiney vagina man; it was Snarla who did all the banging from behind with her strap-on while you cried like a little bitch wasn't it?
 
Dantès said:
You've been spreading a lot of illicit rumors haven't you washer woman. Your shit is getting raggedy tommy, it is getting damn raggedy.
Click to expand...

LMAO; you're so painfully stupid and being used again like the whiney bitch you are by Snarlas strap-on.

It's comedic to watch.
 
Dantès said:
I'm still waiting for the proof that Darla ever said this on this damn board. Let's see it. Otherwise you got this shit from tommy in a PM and you are spreading unsubstantiated rumors. And you are posting the contents of PMS on the board which I was informed is against the rules. Prove it!
Click to expand...

Report it shit-for-brains. The Mods can then confirm what a dunce you are.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I went to Saigon a couple of years ago, me and the missus flew there from Bangkok via Air Asia. Crazy bloody place, the motorbikes are just insane. I went in the rainy season which is a good thing as the traffic has to slow down a bit and the humidity drops a little bit. I would go soon as it is rapidly changing and there will be wall to wall skyscraper hotels there before too long.
Click to expand...

Wall to wall skyscrapers??? I just don't get that. Well, it wont be anytime real soon. Perhaps in a few years. I'll probably come away dissapointed.
 
I Love America said:
Do you ever get tired of coming to her defense? You are kind of pissing all over the "Darla can handle herself" meme when some guy has to come to her defense. Maybe she isn't as badass as she proclaims?
Click to expand...

The answer is as obvious as the nose on your face; Dantes will never tire from being Snarlas whiney little bitch, he loves it up his ass.

LMAO
 
Taft2016 said:
What exactly were you reading?

It certainly couldn't have been the passage you were quoting.

Seriously, are you mentally ill or something?
Click to expand...

Of course, it's what I quoted. He is claiming abolitionists are intolerant of the Spiritual liberty of others. That they would interfere with the conduct of their neighbor which is not their concern and disrupts the slow hand of Providence. It's disgusting.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wall to wall skyscrapers??? I just don't get that. Well, it wont be anytime real soon. Perhaps in a few years. I'll probably come away dissapointed.
Click to expand...

Not much to get, I just mean that there will be a lot of high rise hotels. They were going up whilst I was there, once the new airport is finished it will go crazy. Shame really as Bangkok has been fucked by too many hotels there just isn't a skyline anymore.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Of course, it's what I quoted. He is claiming abolitionists are intolerant of the Spiritual liberty of others. That they would interfere with the conduct of their neighbor which is not their concern and disrupts the slow hand of Providence. It's disgusting.
Click to expand...

I read it as a condemnation of slavery by Lee and God.

Speaking of which, you never answered my question.

What would you have done if you came into a household of slaves as Lee did? Release them recklessly and helplessly into the countryside, or responsibly as Lee did?
 
Taft2016 said:
I read it as a condemnation of slavery by Lee and God.

Speaking of which, you never answered my question.

What would you have done if you came into a household of slaves as Lee did? Release them recklessly and helplessly into the countryside, or responsibly as Lee did?
Click to expand...

There you go again; thinking that the cabal of brain dead Liberals infesting this forum with their buffoonery want an honest debate.

Don't you know they cannot be happy unless they are bashing AmeriKa, the Constitution and Conservatives. It's not about the truth or the facts.

;)
 
Taft2016 said:
I read it as a condemnation of slavery by Lee and God.

Speaking of which, you never answered my question.

What would you have done if you came into a household of slaves as Lee did? Release them recklessly and helplessly into the countryside, or responsibly as Lee did?
Click to expand...

I don't see the value in answering the question. Again I was not much interested in judging Lee but you and Tom seem intent on making him look like scum.

He does not really condemn slavery. He suggests it's necessary for the slave race's instruction and that it is God's will. He seems to only support reform through patiently waiting until the scumbag slaveholders decide it is no longer God's will and calls the abolitionist evil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top