It is a person, Dantés, that it better on ignore. It has nothing useful to communicate, ever.
Good News
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.11
- Start date
It is a person, Dantés, that it better on ignore. It has nothing useful to communicate, ever.
Canceled.2014.2
Canceled
Along with reading tutorials for our more challenged members.
christiefan915
Catalyst
I'm curious about you Truth Deflector. You joined this forum in March 2011 and then there was a gap of over two years before you started posting regularly. Based on your hideous persona and the quality of your tripe, I'm guessing you've joined and been banned from numerous other forums until you realized you could say almost anything here and not get the boot.
You are by far the nastiest, least-credible poster on JPP and there's been some heavy competition for the title. Some of the others occasionally drop the facade and crack a joke or show a more human side of themselves but you're absolutely robotic in your litany of insults. You don't debate, address specifics, or contribute anything of quality, ever. You appear to have the mental development of a three-year old who drops the "f" bomb and other words just to see the effect on the adults around him. Really, what's your payoff in acting like this? Inquiring minds want to know. You say you "don't give a shit about the vagina man drama, etc." yet you're one of the biggest contributors to it. That makes you a hypocrite in addition to being 100% vile.
For a long time I had you on ignore, then I decided to take you off so that I could highlight your ongoing smuttiness. And this post below is a perfect example of what I'm referring to. Now you can whine and mope all you want about it but fair's fair, right? You unspeakable load of filth.
"I already told you no; I don't even know who this "Tommy" is and people rarely PM me because
But I must have hit a nerve of truth here for you to
Loser is clueless as to the image it casts about itself.
Zero debate.
Zero debate skills
Zero respect even for those on it's side.
Zero factual input.
Zero value.
Must be one lonely, angry pos.
Canceled.2014.2
Canceled
This hits the nail on the head. With a sledge hammer.
Taft2016
Verified User
Of course not, because you could possibly disagree substantially with Lee.
What I saw was that it was his hope, and God's will, that it end quickly and peacefully.
Since ending slavery peacefully doesn't suit you, what's your opinion of John Brown?
Taft: If Lee's intentions were peaceful why did he lead a rebellion against the Union?
Another whiney tome from a dishonest lefttard who hates having her bullshit thrown back into her face.
Wonder on dunce. The lovely thing about JPP is that you can out dunces like you without having to worry about censure.
You selective outrage has been noted; and I am honored to be someone you hate.
Carry on dunce!!
Awwww lookie here; the whiniest vagina man on the planet whining again.
Do continue dunce; but anytime you want to square off with me in a debate empty of your whiney vagina man stunts, I'll be here.
You're nothing more than a thread troll who seldom contributes anything beyond your whiney vagina man tirades.
Here's a clue for dunces like you; look at who thanks you.
Carry an super vagina man. I'm am pointing at all of you leftist dunces and laughing.
Thanks, though credit goes to Christiefan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mjölnir
[h=2]Name[/h] Mjölnir is usually interpreted as meaning "That which smashes", derived from the verb mölva "To smash" (cognate with English meal, mill); comparable derivations from the same root meaning "hammer" are Slavic molot and Latin malleus (whence English mallet).
An alternative suggestion compares the name to Russian молния (molniya) and the Welsh word mellt, both words are taken as meaning "lightning". This second theory would make Mjölnir the weapon of the storm god identified with lightning, as in the lightning-bolt or vajra in other Indo-European mythologies.[SUP][1][/SUP]
In the Old Norse texts, Mjölnir is identified as hamarr "a hammer", a word that in Old Norse could mean "hammer" as well as "stone, rock, cliff", ultimately derived from an Indo-European word for "stone, stone tool", h₂éḱmō; as such it is cognate with Sanskrit aśman, meaning "stone, rock, stone tool; hammer" as well as "thunderbolt".[SUP][2][/SUP]
Awwww lookie here; the whiniest vagina man on the planet whining again.
Do continue dunce; but anytime you want to square off with me in a debate empty of your whiney vagina man stunts, I'll be here.
You're nothing more than a thread troll who seldom contributes anything beyond your whiney vagina man tirades.
Here's a clue for dunces like you; look at who thanks you.
Carry an super vagina man. I'm am pointing at all of you leftist dunces and laughing.
That's funny, since Taft, who is your far intellectual superior seems to have run from post 727 above.
Regardless, even if he answers, his position is untenable so all you have done is proven Chritiefan to be absolutely correct.
Indeed, you are the troll, and as she pointed out, the most vile troll yet.
Another whiney tome from a dishonest lefttard who hates having her bullshit thrown back into her face.
Wonder on dunce. The lovely thing about JPP is that you can out dunces like you without having to worry about censure.
You selective outrage has been noted; and I am honored to be someone you hate.
Carry on dunce!!
Again, if you had any brains of note you would recognise her mental acuity as most here on the conservative side do. She is treated with respect by most members here, with rare exception.
Continue to make a fool of yourself though, by all means though.
You are so far beyond laughable as to be pathetic.
The rest of us will continue to respect those who deserve respect, regardless of ideology and dismiss those who don't, such as yourself, Nova, Right (aka SM, DY, Southern Man and Damn Yankee, Racist X (Storm X) and Racist Y (ILA).
Carry on.
Taft?
Dear shit-for-brains; what does a debate about Lee and civil war slavery have to do with the thread topic? Again, you're too stupid to even comprehend thread topics, you're too busy spamming them with whiney vagina man bullshit.
But again, it is a thread started by an angry snarling leftist that contained nothing honest but rather, intended to troll, flame and provoke.
I'm amused by leftist dunces like you. Your butt pals start dishonest threads intended to do nothing but flame and provoke, then when you small brained low IQ dunces get your asses kicked, you whine like little babies.
I'm quite certain that the irony of such moronic antics is way beyond your teensy weensy litte brain to grasp because you really are THAT painfully stupid.
Whine on little man. Your dunce like antics are only amusing to your fellow lefttards.
Ask your butt-buddy Taft, I was replying to him.
Note you couldn't answer either
Yes, provoke a debate, and quite successfully at that. Have you ever started a thread, nevemind one that reached 50 pages in two days?
That is why all but the most dishonest here love Darla, she is thought provoking.
Since clearly you are incapable of intellectualising past your base instincts, you don't recognise her contributions and instead fear and loathe her. Your loss.
You have yet to prove you have even an average IQ. LOL
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
is there any reason to believe you would use them?.....
Taft2016
Verified User
He did not "lead" a rebellion. He joined the armed forces of his home state, which then joined a secessionist nation of states.
As with our nation today, the civlian component of the government declares the wars, the soldiers fight them.
He was the Commander of the Confederate Army, you liar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Lee
I knew you would try to twist your way out of this. Your foot is firmly stuck in your mouth though, sorry.
Taft2016
Verified User
Do you seriously believe I am unaware of that Robert E. Lee was a general in the Confederate Army and need a wiki citation to advise me of such?
You said Lee "lead" the rebellion. I say Jefferson Davis lead the rebellion. Do you wish to debate that?
And if the Commanding Officer of the Army of Northern Virginia is the person who "lead" the rebellion, then its prior three generals; Beauregard, Johnston, and Smith "lead" the rebellion more than Lee did. Lee followed them all.
Last edited:
Because it's just an exercise in fantasy.
He expressed no sentiment that it should end quickly.
Ending it peacefully would have suited me fine, but Lee and the other scumbags chose to rebel against the pressure to change and those who opposed expanding slavery.