Great atheists on the meaning & purpose of life

domer76 said:
The question was “What are your god’s rules?” Obviously, calling someone a motherfucker isn’t one of them. So, what are they?

For instance, PHP’s god allows him to call someone a cunt. Does yours draw the line somewhere? Are you allowed to say “Goddamn”?
Click to expand...
God forgives people for their sins......I'M just following Confucius "golden rule".......you've done it to me so you obviously want me to do it to you.......
 
Matt Dillon said:
My vocab is in the top 2% of this country, and you are a pusillanimous shitbird pretentious rotten fuck.

I'm your Huckleberry anytime, boy.

You got no backbone or willpower boy, I done said that already, you're just too stupid to realize it.
Click to expand...
Please get a fifth grader to edit for you before posting, so you are comprehensible to the rest of us
 
Cypress said:
Please get a fifth grader to edit for you before posting, so you are comprehensible to the rest of us
Click to expand...
Ah! I see you have difficulty comprehending the big words. It appears you're not on my level.

A large part of language is being understood, apparently you don't understand the big words.

You're a pussy-ass wannabe intellectual spineless worm that hates God because you have some weird sexual perversion God would not approve

of and you know it and are ashamed. So you try to deny God, but it's not going to go well for you.
 
Last edited:
Cypress said:
Since you are not fluent in Koine Greek, the language the New Testament was written in, you do not have the standing to complain about how accurate translations are
Click to expand...
really?......because I can link you to a dozen different translation tools on the internet that enable anyone to examine the possible translations from either Greek or Hebrew to English.......I can draw conclusions from using those on which translations I accept.........you jump on a translation coined by Freedman in "Confucius and the Golden Rule" in 2002 and say "Look!......the Bible copied Confucius!"........in reality Freedman copied the Bible.......cope......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
except the guy who penned that translation did it in 2002, not 500 years before Jesus.....
Click to expand...
Nope. The translation in my copy of the Analects was done by James Legge, a well regarded 19th century linguist, Professor of Chinese at Oxford University, translator of Chinese texts, and Christian missionary who obviously saw some recognizable parallels between Confucian thought and Christian teaching, specifically the golden rule.
 
Cypress said:
Nope. The translation in my copy of the Analects was done by James Legge, a well regarded 19th century linguist, Professor of Chinese at Oxford University, translator of Chinese texts, and Christian missionary who obviously saw some recognizable parallels between Confucian thought and Christian teaching, specifically the golden rule.
Click to expand...
Alan watts agrees. I agree.

all the GREAT religions agree.
 
domer76 said:
Nope, he doesn’t. He used to until some fucktard made up some bullshit about atonement. The extra strings attached to the forgiveness thing.
Click to expand...
you must repent to truly be forgiven, or else you're just an asshole abusing the system, a spiritual real estate flipper.
 
morality is evident and eternal.

so much energy is wasted by bad people trying to justify bad things.

what could be?

how do you want to feel?
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
you must repent to truly be forgiven, or else you're just an asshole abusing the system, a spiritual real estate flipper.
Click to expand...
Repent means to merely be sorry for one’s transgression and offer to not repeat it. That’s it. No strings attached.

The atonement thing, requiring one to adhere to the death and resurrection bullshit is completely different.
 
domer76 said:
Repent means to merely be sorry for one’s transgression and offer to not repeat it. That’s it. No strings attached.

The atonement thing, requiring one to adhere to the death and resurrection bullshit is completely different.
Click to expand...
but forgiveness is from another.
 
domer76 said:
Morality is subjective and transient.

What was moral in the past, especially ancient past is no longer considered so.

It is subjective, not evident, from culture to culture
Click to expand...
no it isn't.

read my sig.

it's very easy to figure out if you're treating someone morally or not.

it's as simple as the golden rule.
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
no it isn't.

read my sig.

it's very easy to figure out if you're treating someone morally or not.

it's as simple as the golden rule.
Click to expand...
I don’t read sigs.

Child or human or animal sacrifice in ancient times was not considered immoral. Transient

Gay marriage in some cultural circles is considered immoral even in current times. Subjective
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top