Give the emo environmentalist a break, they are coming off stepping on homeless people to spit on those wearing fur. They have to be allowed to redirect thier faux outrage dont you know. This green rant is getting old at cocktail parties, they'll be all shifted in a few months. Probably after obama caves on drilling as he did on supply side tax cuts.
i have no problem with energy conservation or green energy. i just can't stand the uber left enviro wackos who spout that green energy is not harmful to the environment.
i have no problem with energy conservation or green energy. i just can't stand the uber left enviro wackos who spout that green energy is not harmful to the environment.
You're such a disingenuous fool. Green energy is a "leftie" cause, so of course you hate it.
The loss of eagles w/ wind energy is sad, and bums me out as an environmentalist. But, green energy is in its infancy; technology will get better, more efficient, and less harmful. And the loss of these eagles, while regrettable, is NOTHING - and I mean nothing - compared to the damage that fossil fuel use does to ecosystems, habitats and wildlife.
So eff off w/ your horrific, partisan attempts at equivalency. Threads like this one are the most BS dishonesty that this board gets to see - at any time, ever.
i have no problem with energy conservation or green energy
The biggest problem I have with Green energy is the dubious cost/benefit analysis. Wind power in particular has never realised the cost benefits advocated by its supporters.
You're such a disingenuous fool. Green energy is a "leftie" cause, so of course you hate it.
The loss of eagles w/ wind energy is sad, and bums me out as an environmentalist. But, green energy is in its infancy; technology will get better, more efficient, and less harmful. And the loss of these eagles, while regrettable, is NOTHING - and I mean nothing - compared to the damage that fossil fuel use does to ecosystems, habitats and wildlife.
So eff off w/ your horrific, partisan attempts at equivalency. Threads like this one are the most BS dishonesty that this board gets to see - at any time, ever.
Wind power will never be viable as an energy source unless and until you have a national grid spanning the US. The time and resources would be far better directed to developing thorium based nuclear reactors, if it hadn't been for the Cold War in the 50s and 60s with the US military requiring weapons grade uranium and plutonium then there would be many such reactors now. China and India are leading the field in this technology, you need to wake up and smell the coffee!
I don't know what "never" means in the American experience. TV will never be more than a novelty; we'll never put a man on the moon; computers will never be something for personal use.
Whatever. Scientific progress is always exponential, and always yields unexpected results.
Once lot you mean you hope it gets better and you hope it gets competitive right now it's uneconomical.
i hate it? wow. could you get anymore dishonest?
only in onceler's deluded world does that equate with hate. the rest of your post is just automatic lefty hack defense mechanism babble talk.
smart move running away from this line of reasoning onceler.
Has to! Lofl
Keep praying
Good joke thanks
Your response was a complete throwaway. You always say I'm "running" from your BS. Fact is, it isn't smart stuff.
Give me something smart. I'll respond.