Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The Fundies and Militant Atheists have something to prove, but they are a minority. Most people realize it's a matter of faith and mind their own business.
The Fundies and Militant Atheists have something to prove, but they are a minority. Most people realize it's a matter of faith and mind their own business.
Science does that? Most of science does not deal with questions like that at all. The vast majority of scientists are atheists. They work in logic and evidence. Religion does not.Too bad science calls that free will into question. But you don't seem to much care what science says.
Atheism isn't fundamentalist, Sybil.The Fundies
Atheism isn't militant, Sybil.and Militant Atheists
Atheism is not a proof.have something to prove, but they are a minority.
Atheism has no faith and requires none. It is not a religion.Most people realize it's a matter of faith and mind their own business.
About the only thing you got correct.Atheism has no faith and requires none. It is not a religion.
Science isn't scientists, Sybil. Science is completely aheistic.Science does that? Most of science does not deal with questions like that at all. The vast majority of scientists are atheists. They work in logic and evidence. Religion does not.
Random words. No apparent coherency.Title: The Paradox of the One True God
By RepoMan13th
"A one true god is axiomatically an atheist." This statement challenges the boundaries between monotheism and atheism, suggesting that a singular deity’s rejection of all others mirrors the atheist’s denial of divinity. But is this a theological trap or a philosophical insight? [Add your thoughts or context here.]
Who said a god is owned by a religion, Lich????Every monotheist religion talks about god but when do they ever consider what religion a one true god might be? A god is not owned by a religion.
What is "aheistic"?Science isn't scientists, Sybil. Science is completely aheistic.
Logic and numbers can certainly be part of any religion.