GUN-HATERS resort to burning down gun range in North Carolina

Mott the Hoople said:
You sure it wasn’t a BBQ? They’ll BBQ anything in North Carolina.
Click to expand...

den-and-ron.jpg

SlimColorfulAlbino-max-1mb.gif
1283772631_jump-over-barbeque-fail.gif
Ol8eZQH.gif
 
Last edited:
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Oh yeah - gun free germany in the 1930s functioned real well. Guns are the only way to stop a fascist dictator. When the guns are gone, everything is gone.
Click to expand...

Some history to educate you dumb gun masterbaiters

Whenever the gun-control debate heats up in the United States — usually after an all-too-common mass shooting — guns rights activists often cite Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany gun laws as an example of the dangers of gun control. They claim that these laws, enacted by Hitler himself, disarmed the German people, including minority groups, and made them more vulnerable to oppression and eventually the Holocaust. This historical “fact” often is trumpeted far and wide as an example of what could happen to America with stricter gun-control laws. The problem with that? It’s mostly a myth.
The idea has been propagated by numerous commentators, gun’s rights advocacy groups, politicians, and the NRA. In fact, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre discussed the idea in his book Guns, Crime, and Freedom, writing, “In Germany, Jewish extermination began with the Nazi Weapon Law of 1938, signed by Adolf Hitler.”



these arguments are missing several key points. For starters, the Weapon Law of 1938 actually significantly loosened strict German gun laws that had been put into place by the Weimar Republic government in the years following World War I. These Weimar laws included an initial ban on all private firearm ownership, which was later slightly relaxed into a system of strict regulation requiring numerous permits.
The Nazi Weapon Law deregulated this whole system, as well as other changes that made it much easier for others to acquire firearms:


“The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. ‘The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,’ [law professor Bernard E.] Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.”
The idea that armed German Jews specifically would have been able to fight back against the Holocaust is highly unlikely. The Nazi Germany war machine was one of the most powerful military systems ever constructed, especially prior to and in the early years of World War II, and it would have been able to quash almost any armed resistance. In fact, the largest revolt by armed Jewish citizens during the war — the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto Uprising — was ended in less than a month and resulted in the death of 13,000 Jews versus less than 300 Germans.


http://standardnews.com/adolf-hitler-gun-control-myth/
 
guno said:
Whenever the gun-control debate heats up in the United States — usually after an all-too-common mass shooting — guns rights activists often cite Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany gun laws as an example of the dangers of gun control. They claim that these laws, enacted by Hitler himself, disarmed the German people, including minority groups, and made them more vulnerable to oppression and eventually the Holocaust. This historical “fact” often is trumpeted far and wide as an example of what could happen to America with stricter gun-control laws. The problem with that? It’s mostly a myth.
Click to expand...

You lie like the yella yankee you are. All dictators are anti-gun. They have no choice. THINK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top