EXACTLY,...which is why it is called LYING BY OMISSION.I never heard anyone lying about that, but if you say so…. Maybe you imagined that.
EXACTLY,...which is why it is called LYING BY OMISSION.I never heard anyone lying about that, but if you say so…. Maybe you imagined that.
Really? not enough young whiteys for replacement, a fact, those days are goneThen you are going to be one sad old man then because I guarantee you that we are heading for a Euro dominated BABY BOOM BEGINNING shortly. In fact its already in the wind.
Stroke…heart attack, old man?I completely agree with your view of the history, J.
I'll pass on the gratitude, however.
Really? not enough young whiteys for replacement, a fact, those days are gone
Yes, the white death rate in the United States has exceeded the white birth rate for some time
TRUMPS going to jail!Really? not enough young whiteys for replacement, a fact, those days are gone
Yes, the white death rate in the United States has exceeded the white birth rate for some time
And then the Baby boom began.In 2016, whites accounted for 77.7 percent of all U.S. deaths, but just 53.1 percent of births.
Demographers use the birth-to-death ratio (BDR) to track the changing relationship between fertility and mortality in a population. For whites, the BDR fell from 1.21 in 2000 to just 0.98 in 2016 (Figure 2). Thus, the number of white births for each white death declined from 1.21 in 2000 to less than 1 in 2016. In contrast, even with recent fertility declines associated with the Great Recession there were 4.9 Latino birth for every Latino death, 3.9 Asian births for every Asian death and 1.7 African American birth for every African American death. This combination of high ratios of births to deaths for the minority population and fewer births than deaths among whites accelerated the diversity of the U.S. population.
Oh, I see.EXACTLY,...which is why it is called LYING BY OMISSION.
Since most of N. America was unoccupied land when the first Europeans arrived, your statement is utter bullshit. As for "murdered the Americans," that was mutual, not one-sided, and many of the wars started between Native Americans and Europeans were started by Native Americans.Today we celebrate the first Europeans who immigrated to North America, without any documents, took land and what they could. Murdered the Americans and took the land.
Let’s give thanks for them!
No different than Native Americans did between various tribes, and then between themselves and the Europeans. In fact, often various tribes sided with different European sides in a war that was going on.You don’t think Europeans made war against each other for hundreds and hundreds of years fighting over land and resources?
Plymouth was occupied.Since most of N. America was unoccupied land when the first Europeans arrived, your statement is utter bullshit. As for "murdered the Americans," that was mutual, not one-sided, and many of the wars started between Native Americans and Europeans were started by Native Americans.
TrueNo different than Native Americans did between various tribes, and then between themselves and the Europeans. In fact, often various tribes sided with different European sides in a war that was going on.
wrong question....why do you pretend there was........do you think there are still people here stupid enough to believe the things you sayWhy do you believe there was no law?`
don't know about yours, but the God of the Jews says you Baal worshippers are full of shit.....Our G-D is not the christers man god
Silly to say they had no law.wrong question....why do you pretend there was........do you think there are still people here stupid enough to believe the things you say
Since you believe that land was taken, you should be more than willing to return yours to the rightful owners, the Native Americans.
Will tomorrow be too soon?
All three are as bullshit as your version of history. Plymouth was founded on an abandoned by the Patuxet tribe. The sole survivor of the village later met with the Europeans, along with several other native representatives, and had no problem with their occupation of the site. In fact, several of the early natives that met with the Europeans spoke English leaned from other colonies, and at least one had travelled to Europe.Plymouth was occupied.
Most of the Americas was occupied.
Murder is murder.
I didn’t say they had a problem with the English being there, I simply said the area was occupied.All three are as bullshit as your version of history. Plymouth was founded on an abandoned by the Patuxet tribe. The sole survivor of the village later met with the Europeans, along with several other native representatives, and had no problem with their occupation of the site. In fact, several of the early natives that met with the Europeans spoke English leaned from other colonies, and at least one had travelled to Europe.
In 2016, whites accounted for 77.7 percent of all U.S. deaths, but just 53.1 percent of births.
Demographers use the birth-to-death ratio (BDR) to track the changing relationship between fertility and mortality in a population. For whites, the BDR fell from 1.21 in 2000 to just 0.98 in 2016 (Figure 2). Thus, the number of white births for each white death declined from 1.21 in 2000 to less than 1 in 2016. In contrast, even with recent fertility declines associated with the Great Recession there were 4.9 Latino birth for every Latino death, 3.9 Asian births for every Asian death and 1.7 African American birth for every African American death. This combination of high ratios of births to deaths for the minority population and fewer births than deaths among whites accelerated the diversity of the U.S. population.