Has Obama had 'more than he needs?'

And I completely fail to see what Obama freezing salaries of senior White House staff, which were still higher than Bush's staff, has to do with the $1.4 billion he and Michelle have spent entertaining themselves... can you explain the correlation here?
 
Now the Liberal strategy seems to be the following:

FACTS can be only things that come from the left. It can be innuendo or hearsay, gossip or allegation, that doesn't matter, as long as it's from a left-wing source and as long as some 'perception' can be made through at least a couple leaps of logic... that's FACT and it can't be refuted by anyone.

Things that were once considered FACTS but presented by the right, are now considered LIES. Even if all evidence and information points to the "FACT" being accurate and true, it's still a LIE because it came from a rightie, and nothing they ever say is the truth. Even if it doesn't come from a rightie, and it is impartial public information available to all, if it is presented by a rightie, it automatically becomes a LIE instead of a FACT, because the rightie obviously tainted it. Never can innuendo or hearsay, gossip or allegation, be considered as anything more than that, if it comes from a rightie, in fact, the mere presentation of these things points to the exact opposite being true.

FACT CHECKERS are out in full force, to ensure that the above criteria are complied with fully!
 
Dixie said:
His sources are the Government Accounting Office and public records from the various departments obligated to report this information.

Yes, Gray is a conservative, he served under President Ike, as a matter of fact... your point there?
Click to expand...

You say that yet I didn't see a single link to these records attached to the comments he made.
 
Dixie said:
Hey Zaptard... you wanna answer my OP question or not?
Click to expand...


Oh here we go...Dixie gets cornered, discovers he can't prove his claims because there was no corroborating evidence provided, so he starts with the name calling and the dodging of my questions.

Dixie appears to be getting tips on debating others from Yurt.
 
Dixie said:
Now the Liberal strategy seems to be the following:

FACTS can be only things that come from the left. It can be innuendo or hearsay, gossip or allegation, that doesn't matter, as long as it's from a left-wing source and as long as some 'perception' can be made through at least a couple leaps of logic... that's FACT and it can't be refuted by anyone.

Things that were once considered FACTS but presented by the right, are now considered LIES. Even if all evidence and information points to the "FACT" being accurate and true, it's still a LIE because it came from a rightie, and nothing they ever say is the truth. Even if it doesn't come from a rightie, and it is impartial public information available to all, if it is presented by a rightie, it automatically becomes a LIE instead of a FACT, because the rightie obviously tainted it. Never can innuendo or hearsay, gossip or allegation, be considered as anything more than that, if it comes from a rightie, in fact, the mere presentation of these things points to the exact opposite being true.

FACT CHECKERS are out in full force, to ensure that the above criteria are complied with fully!
Click to expand...


OH the HYPERBOLE OF IT ALL!!

Poor, POOR Dixie!!
 
Do you idoits not comprehend that every penny of government spending has to be accounted for by the GAO? Do you really believe we allow the government to spend money on the president without any oversight or records being kept? You're asking me for public record information, that any imbicile should understand, is recorded somewhere and available to every citizen of America. We don't live in Communist Moscow, where the heads of state can spend the wealth of the people without their knowledge.

The book by Gray cites as it's source, the GAO, and various other departmental reports to the GAO. These are not made up numbers, there is no trick or right-wing distortion, it is a matter of public record and available to any citizen who goes to the trouble to find it. I'm not here to serve you, I don't get paid to do that. If you want the public information, it is available, and if you're not retarded completely, you understand it is available. What you're wanting to do here, is keep kicking the argument further down the road, instead of dealing with the facts and the issue. You have no defense of the issue raised, you don't even try, you just keep questioning sources and demanding more and more 'evidence' in an attempt to tire your opponent and win by default. But I am calling you on that here and now. It's a matter of public record, you can't refute it, and you can't give a defense, so you have been quite officially PWNED.
 
christiefan915 said:
"The White House payroll of $37.8 million has declined since Obama first entered the Oval Office in 2009, when a staff of 487 employees earned total wages of $39.1 million. But how does this compare to George W. Bush's administration? After adjusting for inflation, Bush's White House staff -- consisting of 431 employees -- collected $35.2 million in total wages in the fourth year of his presidency, 2004. Bush wasn't necessarily more frugal, however, as his staff expanded to 447 employees by 2008 at a cost of $35.4 million to taxpayers (adjusted for inflation)."
Click to expand...

color me confused, but a 2012 number of $37.8mil may be a decline from a 2009 number of $39.1mil, but it isn't a decline from a 2008 number of$35.4mil (all adjusted for inflation).......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top