Individuals are not the industry any more than you are whatever industry you work in. Your preposterous assertions of their insurance costs notwithstanding. You aim to "fix" it by attacking the wheels of the car, not the driver.So the medical industry is blameless for their actual malpractice events?
Listen... pay attention now... this is the part you aren't grasping....
A corporation is a piece of paper.... the government is a MEANS of payment. No matter what the money comes from individuals. I know it can be confusing to you... but here is how it works....
The individual pays for healthcare by one of three methods....
1) directly
2) through a collective employer sponsored plan. If the corporation pays a portion that is money that is a form of compensation to the employee... hence the employee pays indirectly
3) Through the government, by which the employee pays taxes which in turn fund the healthcare system
No matter what the taxpayer is paying for the healthcare. The only way you reduce their burden is to reduce the costs of healthcare.
As I stated, if you believe a single payer system will reduce healthcare costs, then yes, it will reduce the burden. But quit trying to pretend it will pay for itself. It is still paid for by taxpayers dollars.
I would like to see your data on the insurance subsidies that benefit 'mainly the rich'.
There is a real value to payment. Their education costs a pretty penny, then when they are done there is some value in the work they do. If they literally couldn't pay the rent, you would have no doctors or very few indeed. Those who believe that they are undervalued when compared to costs would not become doctors very often. The best and the brightest would more often than not choose a different profession.And of course the money is the only reason people become DR's?
Individuals are not the industry any more than you are whatever industry you work in. Your preposterous assertions of their insurance costs notwithstanding.
I'm good with regulation in the medical industry. Right now I am talking about the very real effects of malpractice costs on those that choose this profession. When you attempt to take out the individual from the equation and pretend that cost to the industry is all that counts you find yourself forgetting that you may be disincentivizing the best from even considering the profession.It seems that in the medical profession there is a lot more regulation within the industry itself than exists in other industries. And, given that bad doctors cause the malpractice rates of others to increase, there should be more of it if only as a matter of pure self-interest.
Individuals are not the industry any more than you are whatever industry you work in. Your preposterous assertions of their insurance costs notwithstanding. You aim to "fix" it by attacking the wheels of the car, not the driver.
It's like reading those stories where "SUV kills family of four in rollover accident".
Absolutely nothing in the above sentence has anything to do with the conversation at hand.Absolutely nothing will prohibit you from paying for whatever surgeon you can afford.
A deduction is not a credit and the real cost is gone from their wages in many cases. I don't want an underpaid and undervalued surgeon cutting into my chest. Some overvalued oil guy should understand that.
Which is fine. My original statement was to Topper who insisted they were paid too much, and to you who suggested that since malpractice costs were only a small part of the increase over the past decade that it was unimportant.Where the heck did that come from???
No I say the DR's and medical industry should pay for or correct it's faults.
And of course the money is the only reason people become DR's?
your response:
Pretending that all doctors do it just for the rush of saving people is pretense that ignores the very real humanity of the individuals in the profession.
Where did I pretend ALL Dr's do it for saving people?
You are being disingenious.
There is a real value to payment. Their education costs a pretty penny, then when they are done there is some value in the work they do. If they literally couldn't pay the rent, you would have no doctors or very few indeed. Those who believe that they are undervalued when compared to costs would not become doctors very often. The best and the brightest would more often than not choose a different profession.
Pretending that all doctors do it just for the rush of saving people is pretense that ignores the very real humanity of the individuals in the profession.
If the medical profession would not mess up their malpractice insurance would be cheaper.
No more tort reform to cover for sloppy DR's.
How about consumer information on DR's malpractice and success history so consumers can make informed decisions? Let the market decide?
You go to see a DR and they give you a sheet on that DR with his statistics.
If you see he has 4 successful malpractice claims against him in the last year will you want that DR. to be your DR?
My point in bringing it up is that malpractice premium calculations are a veritable black box that everyone just blindly accepts. Premium calculations should be more transparent as well.
And of course the money is the only reason people become DR's?
your response:
Pretending that all doctors do it just for the rush of saving people is pretense that ignores the very real humanity of the individuals in the profession.
Where did I pretend ALL Dr's do it for saving people?
You are being disingenious.
Agreed LadyT.
btw Obama is pres, where is the whitel male slavery thing anyway?
Dixie and Dano need something productive to do.
I think they are going to vote on it next month. He's still ironing out the details.
First we have to take yer gunz first though.
A deduction is not a credit and the real cost is gone from their wages in many cases. I don't want an underpaid and undervalued surgeon cutting into my chest. Some overvalued oil guy should understand that.
The point dear toppy, it that his salary was 500k, he pays 200k of that to malpractice.
If you are looking at average income, then that does not deduct malpractice. The point was to show you that their average income after expenses was likely lower.
Right. You do know that it is like your salary. In order to make a profit the hospital charges you more than the doctor is worth.fuck you and your uncle
my mom was in the Hospital and the prick dr comes in to say good morning and a fucking nano second glance at the chart $250. Fuck that![]()