He stood his ground?!! (Not?!!)

Dantès said:
Since in this case the shooter was a retired police officer, one would hope that a law that prevented his carrying the gun in theaters would have prevented him from carrying his, and prevented him from shooting this man for doing nothing more than annoying him. Notice I wrote this response without any name-calling, you should try it sometime!
Click to expand...

So this man did not jump out of his seat and assault the retired policeman? Is that the story you are attempting to fabricate? He was just sitting there in his seat annoying everyone around him like a dullard and the cop just jumped up and shot him; is that what you are attempting to say?
 
Truth Detector said:
I had no idea you could read minds and infer intent; you have amazing mind reading abilities counselor.

So tell me dunce; what was I thinking when I purchased an AR15? Or when I bought my Smith and Wesson M645?

What was I thinking when I accumulated the five weapons I now own?
Click to expand...
Your a fucking gun nut
 
evince said:
No means no




I would kill you if you came near me



I don't want anything from you


You are allowed to talk to me on the internets and that is all you will EVER know of me.


why the fuck do you insist on pretending I want your rancid little flesh worm?


I will say it one more time.


YOU will never have any kind of sex with me because I would kill you if you tried.


Now if your so fucking sick in the head you cant understand that means I DONT WANT YOU then your gonna end up in prison soon.


pretending women want you when they have clearly told you they DONT can get you prison time asshole
Click to expand...

Sorry you still don't stand a chance with me in spite of your obvious desires huh
 
Rana said:
He was a retired cop, he should not have felt threatened, he was just pissed and shot the guy.
Click to expand...
APP is reporting that Oulson thew something at him and hit him in the face. Was that an appropriate response for being told the rules, huh
 
Dantès said:
Crime in the aggregate is different than any claims about the number of gun deaths. So to continue to make this point is not only a false equivalency it also confuses causation with correlation. The facts are clear all over the globe. More guns = More gun deaths.
Click to expand...
More guns = less rape. With sex-deprived trogs like evince running around I'll keep mine handy huh
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Man, some asshole throws popcorn at my wife and get's an oil stain on her Eileen Fisher silk blouse I promise you I won't have to do shit.

I'd feel sorry for the fool!
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
The SYG law has set a mindset in certain members of the public that it is acceptable to gun people down if you feel even slightly threatened. Depending on what the witnesses saw, and what this guy says in his defense, he might get away with it.

Repeal of the SYG law, or better yet, having never enacted it, might have prevented this from occurring.
Click to expand...

Dantès said:
Even in the wild west there were many towns where you had to turn in your gun when you arrived and could only pick it up when you left. They understood back in the nineteenth century that more guns = more gun deaths. It isn't hard to do the math. just count all the dead bodies!
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
I don't know that the guy thought about it like that, but I do know that the SYG law has set a certain attitude in the minds of some that the second they feel threatened they are going to go for their gun.

They don't first think, "hey, can I retreat from this situation."

They go to gun ranges and practice for the moment, many are very sure the moment is coming, that they feel threatened. They carry the gun waiting on the moment, again they are sure the moment is coming, that they feel threatened.

Plenty of people are walking around very frightened in public, because exposure to the current media has resulted in a very exaggerated view of the danger. They are ready and going to take action. A movie theater is particularly a place of heightened fear for those people after the Batman massacre.
Click to expand...

Right said:
APP is reporting that Oulson thew something at him and hit him in the face. Was that an appropriate response for being told the rules, huh
Click to expand...

No, but it was also not deserving of a death sentence, either.
 
Rana said:
No, but it was also not deserving of a death sentence, either.
Click to expand...

Of course not; all citizens should take their beatings like good little sheeple and cower together until the State police can come to sort things out after their beatings.

After all; Zimmerman should have taken his MMA beating like a real man right RanaDunce??
 
Another important point for wackjobs is to note that being against this SYG law, does not mean someone wants guns banned.
 
Jarod said:
Another important point for wackjobs is to note that being against this SYG law, does not mean someone wants guns banned.
Click to expand...

Another important point for dunces like you who make up shit as you go, no one argued that it did mean someone wants a gun ban.

But another important point for dishonest uninformed dimwits like you is that the dunces who clamor for rescinding such laws also want to ban guns. Just because you are too dishonest or too stupid to recognize that fact doesn't mean it isn't so.
 
Truth Detector said:
Of course not; all citizens should take their beatings like good little sheeple and cower together until the State police can come to sort things out after their beatings.

After all; Zimmerman should have taken his MMA beating like a real man right RanaDunce??
Click to expand...

But dude, having popcorn thrown at you is equivalent to taking a beating? Yes, the 43 year old man who threw his popcorn at a 71 year old man is an idiot. But throwing popcorn is a life threatening maneuver?
 
Jarod said:
I don't know if he felt threatened or not, I am 95% sure he is going to claim he did.
Click to expand...




yeah with SYG all you have to do is say "they scared me" and its OK to shoot people even while their wife is trying to protect them from you and Begging you not to kill them.

Just shoot right through the wife and kill the "scary" person for texting their young daughter before the movie starts
 
Rana said:
No, but it was also not deserving of a death sentence, either.
Click to expand...
If you act like a tough guy like he did then you take your chances that someone will perceive it as a threat. So if he had acted appropriately there wouldn't have been a problem. See how that works?
 
cawacko said:
But dude, having popcorn thrown at you is equivalent to taking a beating? Yes, the 43 year old man who threw his popcorn at a 71 year old man is an idiot. But throwing popcorn is a life threatening maneuver?
Click to expand...

Is that what happened here; he just threw his popcorn at the old cop?

Here's my take; we don't know the facts of this case yet. The Media, who has an agenda, wants to make this out to be another case of a gun nut shooting first and asking questions later...similar to their efforts in the Zimmerman case; and we know how that turned out in court.

The liberal dunces on this forum gullibly swill these talking points as evidenced by this thread.

If this man unjustifiably shot someone; a court will determine his fate and if that is life in prison, I am fine with that sentence if the FACTS warrant it.

I think someone hit the nail on the head here earlier when they asked a dunce moronically railing about racism, what would they be saying if the retired cop was black? The potential silence would be deafening as it was on other threads regarding black thugs murdering white joggers.

Now you continue to naively believe that the leftists spamming this forum with their glaring ignorance want to have an honest debate and are not ideologically agenda driven; I'm not that naive and merely call it as it really is. I know better than to think any of these morons are honest or want the truth or the facts.
 
evince said:
yeah with SYG all you have to do is say "they scared me" and its OK to shoot people even while their wife is trying to protect them from you and Begging you not to kill them.

Just shoot right through the wife and kill the "scary" person for texting their young daughter before the movie starts
Click to expand...

This claim is completely false; but thank you again for illustrating what a dishonest, patgetic, sociopathic, ideologically driven lunatic you are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top