Head of Hamas government in Gaza eliminated

[moon]

Stop spamming, moonbat.

Broadcasting your stupidity every time you announce something stupid is a public service, not spam.

 

[Earl]

Don't put your military assets in a hospital and it won't get bombed.

 

[Bai Lan]

Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational. It is not 'reasonable' in any way.

you don;t undersand what a paradox is.

your idiocy has hit it's boundary.

you can't keep expecting others to pretend anymore.

 

[moon]

Don't put your military assets in a hospital and it won't get bombed.

Don't put them in tower complexes

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. You are as gullible as they come, and you will apparently regurgitate whatever disinformation your are told to believe without question.

You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.

Iran, through Al Qassam, attacked Israel,

Hamas attacked Israel.

grabbed hostages and departed, and Israel knew this.

They shot and killed Israelites, grabbed hostages, and some of the attackers were shot and killed.

Hamas didn't know about the attack until after it happened

Hamas planned the attack.

and Al Qassam did not stick around in Gaza to fight with the Israeli Terrorist Forces.

Several Hamas attackers were killed. Some got away with hostages.

The only people that were in Gaza after the Oct-7th attack were defenseless Arabs who never attacked Israel.

Blatant lie (denial).

Hamas, Gazas public administrators, were not attacking anyone; they were trying to keep Gaza running.

Blatant lie (denial).

Question: Why did the ITF never find any hostages in Gaza? They've destroyed everywhere and looked everywhere.

They did. Some hostages were rescued.

Question: Why is everyone, to include you, still talking about Hamas as though they are alive, as though they are Al Qassam who has the hostages?

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

Israel is guilty of genocide.

There is no genocide, Hugo.

 

[Into the Night]

Genocide. Germans thought Jews were the antagonists.

There is no genocide, Hugo.

 

[Into the Night]

No, nothing to do with the current war in Gaza. Sorry you couldn't grasp that.
Note to self* Try to explain things simpler in the future.

Explain things to Hugo??? Good luck with that!!

 

[Into the Night]

FTFY. Thank you!

Don't change wording and thank him for it! That particular lie is what Sybil is famous for. Now you stoop to his levels??

Sadly, the answer to that question is that the Likud party benefits from an Arab genocide.

There is no genocide.

Check the polling.

Void reference fallacy.

Gazans did not attack Israel.

Blatant lie (denial).

Nonetheless, their genocide

There is no genocide.

They didn't. Hamas are all dead now.

No, they aren't.

The negotiations, when they occur, are with Al Qassam's representatives in Qatar. There is no Hamas in that equation. They're all dead.

No, they aren't.

Certainly you remember all the cheering and applauding and high-fiving. Gaza has no public administrators left, but that's OK because there's no Gaza remaining either, so they are no longer needed.

Blatant lie (denial).

 

[Into the Night]

you don;t undersand what a paradox is.

your idiocy has hit it's boundary.

you can't keep expecting others to pretend anymore.

You can't resolve your paradox by denial, NoName.

 

[Into the Night]

Don't put them in tower complexes

There was no military in the WTC, moonbat.

 

[Bai Lan]

You can't resolve your paradox by denial, NoName.

both sides of a paradox are arguable.

that's why they're historically perplexing, idiot.

 

[Into the Night]

both sides of a paradox are arguable.

Not possible.

that's why they're historically perplexing, idiot.

You can't resolve your paradox by buzzwords or insults, NoName.

 

[Into the Night]

Broadcasting your stupidity every time you announce something stupid is a public service, not spam.

When did I announce something stupid? Spamming is not a public service.

 

[moon]

There was no military in the WTC, moonbat.

That's what YOU think


Haw, haw.....................................haw.

 

[IBDaMann]

Hamas attacked Israel.

Absurd. Not even possible. You are happy to conflate Hamas, Gaza's public administrators, with Al Qassam, Iran's terrorist proxy. You can't even get the names right because your active support for a brutal genocide would become obvious.

They shot and killed Israelites, grabbed hostages, and some of the attackers were shot and killed.

The proverbial "they", which in this case is the conflation of Al Qassam with Hamas. That's totally dishonest.

Hamas planned the attack.

Al Qassam planned the attack with Iran's Revolutionary Guard. Hamas was not involved. Hamas didn't know about the attack until Al Qassam launched it.

Several Hamas attackers were killed.

There were no Hamas attackers. There certainly could have been Hamas victims of Iran's attack on Israel.

Some got away with hostages.

Al Qassam got away with hostages because Al Qassam perpetrated the attack. The ITF could not find any hostages in Gaza because none were/are there.

 

[Into the Night]

That's what YOU think

That's right, moonbat.

 

[Into the Night]

Absurd. Not even possible. You are happy to conflate Hamas, Gaza's public administrators, with Al Qassam, Iran's terrorist proxy. You can't even get the names right because your active support for a brutal genocide would become obvious.

No conflation. You are still locked in this paradox.

The proverbial "they", which in this case is the conflation of Al Qassam with Hamas. That's totally dishonest.

You are still locked in this paradox.

Al Qassam planned the attack with Iran's Revolutionary Guard. Hamas was not involved. Hamas didn't know about the attack until Al Qassam launched it.

Blatant lie (synthesis). Hamas attacked Israel.

There were no Hamas attackers.

Blatant lie (denial). You are still locked in this paradox.

There certainly could have been Hamas victims of Iran's attack on Israel.

Iran didn't attack Israel. You are still locked in this paradox.

Al Qassam got away with hostages because Al Qassam perpetrated the attack. The ITF could not find any hostages in Gaza because none were/are there.

Hamas perpetrated the attack. You are still locked in this paradox.

You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, IBD. It's irrational.

 

[IBDaMann]

No conflation.

Your conflation of Gaza's public administrators with Iran's terrorist proxy is why everything you have to say on the matter is absurd. You remain on the wrong side of the issue because you WANT to be on the wrong side of the issue. You leave nothing to discuss.

You are still locked in this paradox.

You are locked into supporting a genocide against people who never attacked anyone, and believing that it is the righteous position to have just because Israel is the perpetrator.

That is your special pleading fallacy, not mine.

Blatant lie (synthesis). Hamas attacked Israel.

Blatant lie, just to delude yourself and support ethnic cleaning. How many Arabs are you hoping bite it before it's all over?

Blatant lie (denial). You are still locked in this paradox.

Blatant lie. You are still locked in your special pleading fallacy. How many Arab children were you hoping have to be fished out of rubble?

Israel right or wrong! ... but always right! Launch more of them airstrikes into apartment buildings, shopping centers, schools, hospitals, stores, and anyplace that is FULL of Arabs. We'll just say "Them Arabs should be hiding behind human shields!" ... and then we'll cackle.

Iran didn't attack Israel.

I imagine that this crap works on you. I'm surprised that you think it works on me. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since 1979. You have a talent for ignoring the obvious.

You are still locked in this paradox.

You are still locked in your special pleading fallacy. You can come out anytime.

Hamas perpetrated the attack.

Hamas had no weapons and no money. They are civilian administrators. Once again you are conflating Hamas with Al Qassam who perpetrated the attack on Israel at the behest of the Ayatollah.

You are still locked in this paradox.

You are still trapped in your special pleading fallacy.

You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, IBD. It's irrational.

You cannot argue that genocide is bad, but that it is somehow righteous if Israel does it. Learn the Geneva Conventions.

 

[Into the Night]

Your conflation of Gaza's public administrators with Iran's terrorist proxy

You are still locked in this paradox.

is why everything you have to say on the matter is absurd.

Assumption of victory fallacy.

You remain on the wrong side of the issue because you WANT to be on the wrong side of the issue. You leave nothing to discuss.

You are not discussing anything. Assumption of victory fallacy.

You are locked into supporting a genocide against people who never attacked anyone, and believing that it is the righteous position to have just because Israel is the perpetrator.

There is no genocide. Israel was attacked by Hamas.

That is your special pleading fallacy, not mine.

Fallacy fallacy. No special pleading occurred.

Blatant lie, just to delude yourself and support ethnic cleaning. How many Arabs are you hoping bite it before it's all over?

There is no genocide.

Blatant lie. You are still locked in your special pleading fallacy. How many Arab children were you hoping have to be fished out of rubble?

Fallacy fallacy.

Israel right or wrong! ... but always right! Launch more of them airstrikes into apartment buildings, shopping centers, schools, hospitals, stores, and anyplace that is FULL of Arabs. We'll just say "Them Arabs should be hiding behind human shields!" ... and then we'll cackle.

You can't blame Hamas on Israel.

I imagine that this crap works on you. I'm surprised that you think it works on me. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since 1979. You have a talent for ignoring the obvious.

Iran didn't attack Israel. You are still locked in this paradox.

You are still locked in your special pleading fallacy. You can come out anytime.

Fallacy fallacy.

Hamas had no weapons and no money.

Blatant lie.

They are civilian administrators.

Blatant lie.

Once again you are conflating Hamas with Al Qassam who perpetrated the attack on Israel at the behest of the Ayatollah.

Fallacy fallacy. You are still locked in this paradox.

You are still trapped in your special pleading fallacy.

Fallacy fallacy.

You cannot argue that genocide is bad, but that it is somehow righteous if Israel does it. Learn the Geneva Conventions.

There is no genocide.
Hamas is not a signatory to the Convention.