"Hear me clearly," "America is not a racist country."- Tim Scott

These people never stop to consider their supposed "creator" isnt also christian like them. What need have a god for joining a religion?

Any one true god must automatically be an atheist too. Leads by example, right?

It took me till my bid 30's to appreciate Christianity, after I had spent the first three decades of my life rejectinging it, and traveling through Watts, Jung, Zen and the Tao.

I seem to do most things backwards.

But I get there eventually!

Which is better than most!

Fuck U Haters!
 
I take my refuge in the dharma (teaching of the Buddha) and the sangha (community)
I take my hopes and prayers in the name of the Lord and Christ

I've reconciled the differences in my own mind between anatta and the self (soul)
Nicene Buddhist
 
These people never stop to consider their supposed "creator" isnt also christian like them. What need have a god for joining a religion?

Any one true god would axiomaticly be an atheist too.

Leads by example, right?

Mind your own business, I'll mind mine.
 
Speaking of an obstinate fool...

There is no delusion, racial division is clearly evident in modern journalism.

This moron thinks words are proof of "race". Besides that every single word is a collectivist delusion "race" is especially delusional. How is it you're using a word for describing turd brains running from one place to the next to refer to "family" hmm? How would that be if it weren't delusional.

Collectivist psychotics.... nope don't like em.

Schmucks like this have only just finished spouting biblical, "it is written" fallacy. The most slimey and despicable lie ever shat into existance.
 
Last edited:
Mind your own business, I'll mind mine.

A word for something is not proof of existance. Anyone can scribble up a word, puke a definition, and then act like that word were more than scribbles. None of these actions prove legitimacy, not: the scribble, the actions, the definitions, or any combination there of. You litteraly just tried to ploy an 'it is written fallacy.' You're not only on the menu, you're the dessert list.
 
Manchin is the thin line between a disaster POTUS and just a bad POTUS
did he say he's not gonna support HR1? *awesome*

Ok, I was going by what some of my liberal friends were posting on my social media about him. He’s against DC statehood but my 90 second google search didn’t turn up anything on his stance with federalizing election laws. Though he did say some time ago he wasn’t going to go along with the democrats radical stuff.
 
A word for something is not proof of existance. Anyone can scribble up a word, puke a definition, and then act like that word were more than scribbles. None of these actions prove legitimacy, not: the scribble, the actions, the definitions, or any combination there of. You litteraly just tried to ploy an 'it is written fallacy.' You're not only on the menu, you're the dessert list.

Literally*.

Spelling fallacy.
 
there surely is no more investigative journalism. maybe Tucker on a good night.
News journalism has become Fake News
feature news is just soft pillow news -not much value
opinion journalism is about all thats left but that's a product of the rank partisan crap
we see masquerading as news

There’s a gaping hole where actual investigative journalism used to reside and presently it’s being filled by a literal handful of characters; maybe one or two of them can be found in traditional media.
 
I think comparing the modern US society as the same as south africa or the nazis is a misguided attempt at hyperbole.

But also indirectly accurate. America owes all it's greatness to hitler who gave us europe's whole gold cash. For tge first time in history we had a currency the british couldnt manipulate. It stayed that way for a long time. Over now tho...... so say what you want, hitler made this country great. Also our best spy jfyi.
 
There’s a gaping hole where actual investigative journalism used to reside and presently it’s being filled by a literal handful of characters; maybe one or two of them can be found in traditional media.

There is great deal of good investigative journalism if you know where to look - TV and most websites not being where. Try: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, Forbes, Mother Jones, ProPublica, among others, and best of all, The New York Times which continually wins national and international awards for it.
 
There is great deal of good investigative journalism if you know where to look - TV and most websites not being where. Try: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, Forbes, Mother Jones, ProPublica, among others, and best of all, The New York Times which continually wins national and international awards for it.
most if that is partisan swill, the occasional exception being Rolling Stone..partisanship has destroyed unbiased investigative journalism

I use the Intercept. or Glen Greenwald alone now for truthiness
 
Ok, I was going by what some of my liberal friends were posting on my social media about him. He’s against DC statehood but my 90 second google search didn’t turn up anything on his stance with federalizing election laws. Though he did say some time ago he wasn’t going to go along with the democrats radical stuff.
HR1 is an assail on federalism and any type of election integrity. the rest is important but pales in comparison
 
most if that is partisan swill, the occasional exception being Rolling Stone..partisanship has destroyed unbiased investigative journalism

I use the Intercept. or Glen Greenwald alone now for truthiness

Wrong. Correct that Intercept is also good but wrong that publications that editorialize politically do not in many cases separately cover news accurately and in depth, including providing muscular investigative journalism. Calling The New York Times "swill" is itself swill.
 
HR1 is an assail on federalism and any type of election integrity. the rest is important but pales in comparison

Democrats may have to stack SCOTUS at the same time because I don’t think HR1 could withstand scrutiny as the Court is presently constituted. But I’m confident Manchin would nix it.
 
Wrong. Correct that Intercept is also good but wrong that publications that editorialize politically do not in many cases separately cover news accurately and in depth, including providing muscular investigative journalism. Calling The New York Times "swill" is itself swill.
NYTime posts so much swill I dont even trust it. They and WAPO were instrumental in pushing the Russian Hoax
Then they did the "Russian bounties" on US soldiers as breaking news -more lies
 
Democrats may have to stack SCOTUS at the same time because I don’t think HR1 could withstand scrutiny as the Court is presently constituted. But I’m confident Manchin would nix it.
I hope so. SCOTUS really hates to rule on separation of powers, and Roberts is notorious on punting to the status quo
 
Back
Top