Hegseth hosts first meeting of what he says will be a monthly Christian prayer service at Pentagon

Mike Johnson Insists It’s ‘Moral’ to Throw People Off Medicaid​

The House speaker also claimed the Republican bill is not cutting Medicaid or SNAP, even though it would reduce the number of beneficiaries

www.rollingstone.com

Mike Johnson Insists It's 'Moral' to Throw People Off Medicaid

House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed adding a Medicaid work requirement to the Republican spending bill has a "moral component."
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com
 
Magats_Love_NHB said:
have-you-accepted-donald-as-your-personal-savior-v0-cscpq1j5fz2f1.jpeg
Click to expand...

The sad thing is, the more we laugh at the MAGAT cult, the more entrenched they become. Watch for our Resident Fake Teacher and Faux Church Lady to post a barrage of cringy smarmy retaliatory memes. :laugh:
 
Into the Night said:
The repetition is YOURS, Damo. I am repeating my response to your repetition.

No, it isn't, and you are chasing a strawman fallacy here. The Bible is not on trial in a court of law.

It is quite adminssible.

Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy.
-----------------------------------------------------

So you agree with me. Hearsay evidence is admissible. You have just demonstrated your agreement with me.
Click to expand...
lol. We'll make this a bit fun, as the Depp trial was often funny. But it was a lesson in hearsay that even a layman can understand. Each objection for hearsay was upheld, the testimony was not allowed. And in this case the hearsay was firsthand hearsay, not secondhand like the evidence you keep insisting would be allowed in court. While it is evidence, it is sketchy evidence and inadmissible in court.

Watch this video, in this lawsuit, and tell me how often things were stricken and how many objections were for hearsay. If you are honest with yourself, you will stop insisting that hearsay is admissible regularly in trials. Or, you can just keep repeating incorrect information, at this point I do not believe anyone is taking you seriously any longer. I even posted the rules from an actual prosecutor, the link I gave also talked about the legality of certain exceptions and how they applied, but you just skip past that and continue with your repetition fallacy.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXFvkJLqPqo
 
Jade Dragon said:
He used to be better, but his disposition toward and loathing of Biden have made him act irrationally and unfairly. I've tried to tell him he can't brush us all into his bias-minded corner, but it doesn't work. For example, his whataboutism of Muslims praying and the imaginary image of democrats totally being fine with it is bogus. As a Christian, I'm against any prayer that is turned into a spectacle. Just as well, as a liberal, I'm against any public endorsement of any religion, especially by the government.
Click to expand...
Can you point to whare I said leftists would be fine with this? I don't think you can, because I said I thought they would likely be the only people objecting. Nor was this my "whataboutism" this was the "whataboutism" of ThatOwlWoman, she insisted the "rightwing" would freak if Ilhan Omar led prayers like this.

I said: I believe that only leftists would object, mostly because it was not inclusive enough. What I did not say: The leftists would love this.

What I have said here is, I'd like to see that happen when someone said, "If Ilhan Omar led prayers like this the rightwing would object." I said: Let's test this out, instead of your speculation let's see if we can get her to go and pray in support of our troops and their safety and then we can see who objects.
 
Magats_Love_NHB said:

Mike Johnson Insists It’s ‘Moral’ to Throw People Off Medicaid​

The House speaker also claimed the Republican bill is not cutting Medicaid or SNAP, even though it would reduce the number of beneficiaries

www.rollingstone.com

Mike Johnson Insists It's 'Moral' to Throw People Off Medicaid

House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed adding a Medicaid work requirement to the Republican spending bill has a "moral component."
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com
Click to expand...

In many states, if not all of them by now, two-thirds of the people on Medicaid are nursing home residents. Their families have had to liquidate every asset they had accrued over their lifetimes, and spend it on the SNF until it was gone. Only then would Medicaid kick in.
 
You cannot follow both Christ and the cruelty of kings. A leader who mocks the weak, exalts himself, and preys on the innocent is not sent by God. He is sent to test you. And many are failing.
 
Diesel said:
Don't punch above your class, MAGAt. I will destroy you every time.
Click to expand...
MAGA isn't a person, Gasbag.
Diesel said:
You said, "[G]etting America back to being a sane Constitutional Republic that adheres to it's Christian roots."
Click to expand...
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!
Diesel said:
Where shall I start? Christianity is not imbued in the US's political system.
Click to expand...
Go read the Declaration of Independence, written by the same people that drafted and signed the Constitution. Also go see constitutions of various States.
Diesel said:
"It's", you fucking brain dead idiot, is a contraction. It means "it is". When you're barely trying to describe possession, the word is "its" without the apostrophe. Like, "Hater has the worst t(its) I have ever seen in my life."
Click to expand...
Don't try to demonstrate your illiteracy. I already know.
Diesel said:
I'm not anti-Christian, but your dumb ass does post whatever falls out of your diabetes fingers into the internet. I have more moral principles than you do. For example, I believe in the humane and compassionate treatment of all humans who aren't MAGAts. You're dismissed, stupid fuck.
Click to expand...
MAGA isn't a person.
 
Damocles said:
Can you point to whare I said leftists would be fine with this? I don't think you can, because I said I thought they would likely be the only people objecting. Nor was this my "whataboutism" this was the "whataboutism" of ThatOwlWoman, she insisted the "rightwing" would freak if Ilhan Omar led prayers like this.

I said: I believe that only leftists would object, mostly because it was not inclusive enough. What I did not say: The leftists would love this.

What I have said here is, I'd like to see that happen when someone said, "If Ilhan Omar led prayers like this the rightwing would object." I said: Let's test this out, instead of your speculation let's see if we can get her to go and pray in support of our troops and their safety and then we can see who objects.
Click to expand...
Sorry, must have misread it—too many posts to keep up with.
 
The new programs are going to be great and save all kinds of money... No one who is eligible and deserves to get funding is going to lose their coverage.... Including children, disabled, and elderly people...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top