Hegseth issues an illegal order.

You'd think being 15 feet away from an high explosive incendiary strike, the two survivors treading water would have had their ear drums blown out and were too wounded and disoriented to be coordinating reinforcements.
Agreed. I doubt they understood what happened to them.
 
The survivors were treading water and clinging to the burning remains of a wreck.

Assuming their ear drums weren't blown out, and their brains weren't suffering concussion, I don't think sat phones are meant to be submerged in salt water or exposed to fire.
...as if anyone with a satphone would still be hanging onto it after the ship was blown out of the water and they were thrown overboard.

OTOH, the MAGAt logic applies to how treat traitors and other domestic enemies of our Constitution when the civil war starts next year. Got a Trump sign in your yard? A Trump bumper sticker? You're an enemy of the Constitution and should be immediately executed by hanging or a bullet to the back of the head.

Wanna guess how many MAGAt cracker retards start whining about the "Laws of War" when the tables are turned? I'm thinking 100%. :rofl2::ROFLMAO::rofl2:
 
Why haven't they released the video?
Why does that matter?

If the boat was sinking or inoperable, they would be.
Nope. The boats were valid military targets. Any narcoterrorist who chose to remain on the valid military target rather than distance himself from it, made a stupid decision.

Retrieving alleged drugs does not allow our military to kill a person.
Our military does not need the enemy's permission to kill the enemy in warfare.
 
Why does that matter?


Nope. The boats were valid military targets. Any narcoterrorist who chose to remain on the valid military target rather than distance himself from it, made a stupid decision.


Our military does not need the enemy's permission to kill the enemy in warfare.
1) because if it supported their case, you know it would be running in a continuous loop on Fox News

2) stupid decisions do not entitled our military to kill you.

3) nobody said you needed the enemies permission, you do need the law on your side.
 
1) because if it supported their case, you know it would be running in a continuous loop on Fox News

2) stupid decisions do not entitled our military to kill you.

3) nobody said you needed the enemies permission, you do need the law on your side.
you either have the power to destroy a drug boat or you don't

claiming the first attack was ok, but the second one is not is absurd on its face
 
You'd think being 15 feet away from an high explosive incendiary strike, the two survivors treading water would have had their ear drums blown out and were too wounded and disoriented to be coordinating reinforcements.

And yet they still picked up the Sat Phone.

The Seditious Six tried to incite a military coup. This ploy to excuse their treason has failed.

Kelly is heading for a Court Martial and a dishonorable discharge.

And to be sure, NOTHING is more dishonorable that inciting soldiers to mutiny.
 
If these Narco-terrorists and their deadly drugs were not blown up on the first strike, the second was merited.

The retards of the pedo party are demanding that should a soldier miss with the first shot, they are prohibited from taking a second.

Yeah, it's about the dumbest shit ever - but people don't become democrats because they're smart.

Standard Disclaimer: They become democrats because they are evil.
 
1) because if it supported their case, you know it would be running in a continuous loop on Fox News

2) stupid decisions do not entitled our military to kill you.

3) nobody said you needed the enemies permission, you do need the law on your side.

Got it. So when a soldier is in combat, they must not fire on the enemy until that enemy has been to court and had a judge order that the soldier may shoot.

You Stalinists sure are smart. Especially the fake lawyers.
 
1) because if it supported their case, you know it would be running in a continuous loop on Fox News

2) stupid decisions do not entitled our military to kill you.

3) nobody said you needed the enemies permission, you do need the law on your side.
All MAGAt cracker retards are enemies of the Constitution and should be treated accordingly.
 
you either have the power to destroy a drug boat or you don't

claiming the first attack was ok, but the second one is not is absurd on its face
Nope, If you accept the premise that they were allowed to kill these people
Got it. So when a soldier is in combat, they must not fire on the enemy until that enemy has been to court and had a judge order that the soldier may shoot.

You Stalinists sure are smart. Especially the fake lawyers.
Uh, no.
 
Did I say I was fine with it? You rushed in about Obama. Why?

Name them. Quote them. Nobody wants drugs and terrorists being imported here.

Citation please. Quote them. Should be easy for you.

Conspiracy theories without evidence are dismissed.

Yeah yeah yeah. I do side with the terrorists and drug traffickers.

You really got me.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
 
Back
Top