Hello all

I don't know what that is or how to use it. Could you PM me?

Below the text box for the post there is another where you key names to prohibit. Be sure to click the name n the suggested list to add it. Can't add after its posted that I know of
Sorry it's under settings (top bar) and then general settings default subscribe switch
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Road


The National Road (also known as the Cumberland Road)[1] was the first major improved highway in the United States built by the federal government. Built between 1811 and 1837, the 620-mile (1,000*km) Road connected the Potomac and Ohio Rivers and was a main transport path to the West for thousands of settlers. When rebuilt in the 1830s, it became the second U.S. road surfaced with the macadam process pioneered by Scotsman John Loudon McAdam.[2]
Construction began heading west in 1811 at Cumberland, Maryland, on the Potomac River.[3] After the Financial Panic of 1837 and the resulting economic depression, Congressional funding ran dry and construction was stopped at Vandalia, Illinois, the territorial capital of the Illinois Territory, 63 miles (101*km)[4] northeast of St. Louis across the Mississippi River.
The road has also been referred to as the Cumberland Turnpike, the Cumberland-Brownsville Turnpike (or Road or Pike), the Cumberland Pike, the National Pike, and the National Turnpike.[citation needed]
Today, much of the alignment is followed by U.S. Route 40, with various portions bearing the Alternate U.S. Route 40 designation, or various state-road numbers (such as Maryland Route 144 for several sections between Baltimore and Cumberland).
In 2002, the full road, including extensions east to Baltimore and west to St. Louis, was designated the Historic National Road, an All-American Road.[5]

mere facts
 
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Cumberland-Road




Cumberland Road, also called National Road, first federal highway in the United States and for several years the main route to what was then the Northwest Territory. Built (1811–37) from Cumberland, Md. (western terminus of a state road from Baltimore and of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal), to Vandalia, Ill., it forms part of the present U.S. Route 40. In April 1802 Congress appropriated land-sale funds to finance an overland link between the Atlantic Coast and the new state of Ohio. A macadam pavement was completed to Wheeling, Va. (now West Virginia), on the Ohio River, by 1818. From 1833 the various sections of the road became the financial responsibility of the states in which they were situated. Under this arrangement, the use of the Cumberland Road, intended to be free, was subject to state-imposed tolls.

mere facts
 
https://www.cato.org/policy-report/mayjune-1996/privatize-post-office-authors-urge


May/June 1996
Privatize the Post Office, Authors Urge

"The case for privatizing the Postal Service is clear," writes Cato's director of regulatory studies Edward Hudgins in the introduction to the new Cato book The Last Monopoly: Privatizing the Postal Service for the Information Age. "The Postal Service survives through sheer political power, not through its ability to satisfy customers. As the country moves into the 21st century, and as policymakers attempt to restore economic liberty, those policymakers should show the courage to abolish the last monopoly and privatize the U.S. Postal Service," says Hudgins.
The essays in this book are grouped by topic, starting with "The State of the Postal Service." Postmaster General Marvin Runyon writes that universal, government-backed mail service is necessary but concedes that introducing standard business practices to the Postal Service will begin to remedy its flaws. He argues for the "right amount of deregulation" of the Postal Service--but not complete privatization.
James I. Campbell Jr. traces the history of the postal monopoly, and Peter Ferrara argues that the inherent problems of the government postal monopoly have resulted in rates as much as 50 percent higher than they would be if competition were allowed. Gene Del Polito advocates fundamental change in a postal system that rewards laziness, punishes efficiency, and is wont to implement periodic "Band-Aid" solutions that fail to cure the disease of monopoly.
In Part II, "Competing with the Post Office," Thomas M. Lenard and Stephen L. Gibson examine the efficiency and low costs of private delivery firms and the new technologies of the telecommunications revolution, respectively. Thomas DiLorenzo considers the "natural monopoly" myth about the Postal Service and concludes that mail delivery would be less costly and more reliable if the Postal Service's monopoly were eliminated.
In Part III, "Market Structures for Private Delivery," R. Richard Geddes analyzes the results of a privatized system and concludes that "consumers would have even greater choices in the speed of delivery and price levels to suit their needs." Michael A. Crew provides an international perspective in his essay; noting that most industrialized countries are moving toward markets in postal delivery, he argues that high labor costs and access to established postal networks will be the primary problems in a move toward privatization in the United States. Former senior assistant postmaster general Murray Comarow recommends that a commission analyze problems and recommend changes in the Postal Service but cautions against immediate moves toward privatization before the details of such a system are fully examined.
The last part of The Last Monopoly examines two very different plans for privatization. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) suggests making the Postal Service an employee stock-ownership company, giving employees the opportunity to profit from a competitive private firm. Douglas K. Adie's solution is to break up the Postal Service into regional divisions (similar to the AT&T's breakup into regional Bell telephone systems). A holding company would control the divisions until they were sold off and take other transitional steps to full privatization.
The Last Monopoly, which includes revised versions of papers presented at a June 1995 Cato conference on "Private Postal Service in the 21st Century," puts the debate over postal privatization in perspective and provides a variety of insights into the specific problems to be solved by a free market in mail delivery. As editor Edward Hudgins writes, "The burden of proof should be on those who would retain the postal monopoly. The correct question to ask, then, is not, 'Should the Postal Service be privatized?' Rather, [it] is, 'Is there any compelling reason for maintaining the postal monopoly?'"

cato is libertarian central
 
It's so vague. Is it responsible for tax dollars to be increased to pay certain people huge 6K figure salaries for doing nothing? Are you happy with Congress?
 
Back
Top