Here’s what happened when Trump was asked about his ‘favorite’ author in a 1987 TV in
- Thread starter Cinnabar
- Start date
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Oh geeze. That was embarrassing. I've always thought of the Toadstool as a male version of $arah Palin. Turns out I'm right. "Which newspapers and magazines do you read?" "All of them!" 
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Cinnabar,
Oh, that's priceless.
I didn't realize he's been using his old technical malfunction trick for so long!
Earphone, smear phone.
Oh, that's priceless.
I didn't realize he's been using his old technical malfunction trick for so long!
Earphone, smear phone.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Trump's problem here is rather clear.
It's not the earphone in his ear.
But rather what is further South.
Tis his own foot within his mouth!
It's not the earphone in his ear.
But rather what is further South.
Tis his own foot within his mouth!
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
I got inspired by Mr. "You're fired."
Here's Obama when asked how many states he has been to; embarrassing:
Obama 57 states
Obama 57 states
Note the expression oh his face at the 38/39 mark...what a tell this liar has.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Cinnabar,
Oh, yeah.
Stop it right there and you can see his quick eyeroll when he realizes he has been caught in a lie - but it doesn't even phase him. He goes into the 'bad earphone' routine so instantly he gives himself away as simply having that habit.
He gets caught in a lie and then, without even thinking about it, goes right into pretending he didn't understand.
Note that he NEVER complains about having a bad earphone until then - rather he immediately responds to every other question. It's only when he gets caught in a lie that the old 'bad earphone' routine surfaces.
WHAT A CONMAN.
Oh, yeah.
Stop it right there and you can see his quick eyeroll when he realizes he has been caught in a lie - but it doesn't even phase him. He goes into the 'bad earphone' routine so instantly he gives himself away as simply having that habit.
He gets caught in a lie and then, without even thinking about it, goes right into pretending he didn't understand.
Note that he NEVER complains about having a bad earphone until then - rather he immediately responds to every other question. It's only when he gets caught in a lie that the old 'bad earphone' routine surfaces.
WHAT A CONMAN.
evince
Truthmatters
Obama "UH" Counter in Presidential Debate. WOW!!
evince
Truthmatters
right before his eye shift he sticks his tongue in his cheek
the eye part is part of his tell too
he looks around the room he is in to see if those people caught the lie
Most liars don't think they got caught unless someone says "hey that isn't true"
News interviewers need to say that to him while interviewing him
Yes, that tongue in cheek and smirk is a dead giveaway. Notice how he used the same adjectives to describe something then as he does today when he has no clue as to what he is talking about. I agree, no one calls this a-hole out enough on the spot. I'm still waiting for someone to publicly ask him about those private investigators he sent to Hawaii who "could not believe what they were finding" regarding Obama's birth certificate. His trolling Obama was an actual with hunt, btw.
Last edited:
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello evince,
That's a toughie. How many times have you been watching a news interviewer ask a politician tough questions and the politician completely evades the question?
It is often so blatant as to be absurd.
A question that can really be answered only with a 'yes' or 'no' answer sets the politician talking for 5 minutes about anything BUT the question.
Makes you want to cry.
I used to get so angry watching such interviews, shouting at the screen: "ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!"
I no longer get angry. I was only stressing myself out over nothing.
I get it now.
If interviewers were to press the point, call them out on evasive answers, they would gain a reputation for doing so and quickly find that nobody would agree to be interviewed by them.
It must be tough to be one of those interviewers. You want to ask the tough questions, hold their feet to the fire, but then you also have a job to do and you can't do it if nobody will talk to you.
So they have to be very careful about how they word their questions and they have to let the person have their say.
They can't all be like Rush Limbaugh, who needs to follow none of those rules, simply refuses to even talk to those who would spill the truth, and if anyone even gets close, he just cuts them off and rants for 5 minutes, tosses out all kinds of conspiracy theories and accusations, then cuts to a commercial.
That's a toughie. How many times have you been watching a news interviewer ask a politician tough questions and the politician completely evades the question?
It is often so blatant as to be absurd.
A question that can really be answered only with a 'yes' or 'no' answer sets the politician talking for 5 minutes about anything BUT the question.
Makes you want to cry.
I used to get so angry watching such interviews, shouting at the screen: "ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!"
I no longer get angry. I was only stressing myself out over nothing.
I get it now.
If interviewers were to press the point, call them out on evasive answers, they would gain a reputation for doing so and quickly find that nobody would agree to be interviewed by them.
It must be tough to be one of those interviewers. You want to ask the tough questions, hold their feet to the fire, but then you also have a job to do and you can't do it if nobody will talk to you.
So they have to be very careful about how they word their questions and they have to let the person have their say.
They can't all be like Rush Limbaugh, who needs to follow none of those rules, simply refuses to even talk to those who would spill the truth, and if anyone even gets close, he just cuts them off and rants for 5 minutes, tosses out all kinds of conspiracy theories and accusations, then cuts to a commercial.
Last edited:
I also have no patience for such softball interviews. I would have a rep for holding tough interviews and if a person declined to be honestly questioned, I would label them a wuss and/or liar. I see no value in an interview that allows for evasiveness and deception.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Donald Trump is the abomination of the male human species.
He has fucked up everything he has ever touched- or groped!
Worst excuse of a man I ever knew of.
He has fucked up everything he has ever touched- or groped!
Worst excuse of a man I ever knew of.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
I am SO glad I am not a conservative Republican Trump fan. It must be stressful to have to defend such support, pretending to not know what is so well known about the man.
He is a liar, a racist, a cheat and a CONMAN.
YEP, 100% correct....... One of the reasons I don't bother much either.........
& one of the reasons I do like someone like Chris Wallace, Sam Donaldson etc that can ask some tough questions.... I think that Acosta sometimes as well, but honestly I don't watch much TV & when I do it isn't anything about politics etc