icedancer2theend
Verified User
They do. Just because Paul finds it personally immoral, doesn't mean that he would object to their legal use/distribution.
Nor Santorum.
They do. Just because Paul finds it personally immoral, doesn't mean that he would object to their legal use/distribution.
Unless he said more than that, he isn't getting into people's choices.
He is simply discussing cause & effect. If one is a christian, then pre-marital sex or extra marital sex is a sin and would be immoral. Very often the bad potential consequences of an action is what stops people from doing it.
I haven't seen him talk about removing or banning contraceptives.
They do. Just because Paul finds it personally immoral, doesn't mean that he would object to their legal use/distribution.
It is a judgement call, married people use birth control. I thought Libertarians didn't stick their noses into others business. What two consenting adult choose to do is their own business.
Well,you see it differently than I. It is a judgement call. I thought Libertarians didn't poke their nose in others business, making judgements on what is and isn't moral. What about married people using the pill because they don't want children?
It is a judgement call, married people use birth control. I thought Libertarians didn't stick their noses into others business. What two consenting adult choose to do is their own business.
He never said otherwise.
Well, we will have to disagree, I see him thinking if you are immoral, you use the pill, it is sticking your nose into others business.
How so? I think Topspin is a moron. I have formed a personal opinion about him. I have not, in any way, stuck my nose into his business.