Hey libbies

Im telling you this little faction of the right wants this government dead.

at least they are beginning to admit it

Wrong again asshat; we want it limited to within its Constitutional limitations to preserve our freedoms and liberties.

But you're a brain dead hyper partisan asshat; since when did you care about the truth, facts or reality.

Moron.
 
I'd be happy to correct you.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/25/shared-sacrifice-war-taxes-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html

"In 1968, a 10% surtax was imposed to pay for the Vietnam War, which raised revenue by about 1% of GDP."

Interesting you are speaking of the

The Revenue and Expenditure Control Act of 1968 which was a temporary surtax of 10% which then fell to 5% and then 2.5%? See PDF below.

http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/projects/bpea/1971 1/1971a_bpea_okun_hymans_taylor_eisner.pdf

I knew libtards like you would jump on this as your "gotcha", but please go back and read my question. I said "START" a war.

What year did LBJ escalate activities in Vietnam? 1968? Now I don't want to get in a debate about who started Vietnam, or when specifically it escalated. I will be generous to your stupidity and give you the benefit of the doubt that LBJ didn't escalate Vietnam until June 8, 1965, when he committed to send U.S. ground forces to South Vietnam.

So it is clear that LBJ escalated/started a war without raising the funds to pay for it. That surcharge tax didn't come until three years in.

EPIC FAIL on your part. Want to try again puddin? Or are you going to threaten to stalk me like you did 007?
 
what does spending on military and wars have to do with libs catering to big business for cheaper labor brought in from overseas while americans suffer for jobs????
 
Im telling you this little faction of the right wants this government dead.

at least they are beginning to admit it

Wrong sugar tits. I just want it to go back to the original intent of the US Constitution and be limited in scope.

Do you not support limited government? Outside of abortion, what don't you want the gobblement to do? I know you like being a capitalist yourself, but not for others, but what other contradictions can you offer?
 
how much of the Iraq war costs were paid while Bush was in office?

do you even know?

I am certain that a vulgar uninformed hyper partisan asshat like you wouldn't know much of anything. Your claims are those of a retard on steroids.
 
Wrong sugar tits. I just want it to go back to the original intent of the US Constitution and be limited in scope.

Do you not support limited government? Outside of abortion, what don't you want the gobblement to do? I know you like being a capitalist yourself, but not for others, but what other contradictions can you offer?


you don't understand the constitution or history
 
what does spending on military and wars have to do with libs catering to big business for cheaper labor brought in from overseas while americans suffer for jobs????

Nothing. They are just trying to distract because their brains can't comprehend that their party is filled with supporters of crony capitalism.

They have been taught that only the GOP is the toady of BIG BIDNESS. Not their precious democrats.
 
you don't understand the constitution or history

Sugartits, I can 1000% I know more about the US Constitution and US History than your dumb ass.

Shit, you can't even comment on something without running to Wikiepedia.

Tell ya what, let's have a little fun. Oh wait, you aren't allowed on APP.

Let me see what I can do
 
I am amused that you think others are unintelligent when the extent of your presumed evidence contains nothing but “supposedly”, hearsay and nothing more substantive than “because you say so.” I asked for evidence not OPINION.

You made the moronic claims; it is incumbent on you to support them, not mine to go out and find what doesn’t exist you dumbass.



That would be because you can’t find anything credible to support your baloney claims.



I don’t twist anything, you make amazingly stupid claims that you cannot support or substantiate with anything more than bloviating then whine like a little vagina when you get called on it.

I was very clear; please provide credible proof of ANY nation that fought wars with surpluses or balanced budgets…..ANY. It is an incredibly moronic claim that only whiney vagina bitches like you can make.

Once again you are illustrative proof of the low information dipshits that helped elect this inexperienced buffoon of a President on nothing more substantive than "hope and change." How is that working for you right now??

regarding Atta and Iraqi intelligence in Prague:

http://mediamatters.org/research/2005/12/15/cnns-blitzer-spun-cheneys-attaprague-claims/134448

Cheney did, in fact, discuss the alleged meeting as an unqualified certainty. From Cheney's November 14, 2001, appearance on CBS's 60 Minutes II:

GLORIA BORGER (CBS News contributor): Well, you know that Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the hijackers, actually met with Iraqi intelligence.

CHENEY: I know this. In Prague, in April of this year, as well as earlier. And that information has been made public. The Czechs made that public. Obviously, that's an interesting piece of information.


regarding Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld's claims about Iraqi oil revenue funding a good portion of the war and its recovery:

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2011/1222/Iraq-war-Predictions-made-and-results

Ahead of and shortly after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, a number of officials, including former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy Paul Wolfowitz suggested the war could be done on the cheap and that it would largely pay for itself. In October 2003, Rumsfeld told a press conference about President Bush's request for $21 billion for Iraq and Afghan reconstruction that "the $20 billion the president requested is not intended to cover all of Iraq's needs. The bulk of the funds for Iraq's reconstruction will come from Iraqis -- from oil revenues, recovered assets, international trade, direct foreign investment, as well as some contributions we've already received and hope to receive from the international community." In March 2003, Mr. Wolfowitz told Congress that "we're really dealing with a country that could finance its own reconstruction."



My statement about war financing was unambiguous. No country has ever gone to war without instituting revenue increases designed to defray the cost of that war.... until Bush, that is.
 
Interesting you are speaking of the

The Revenue and Expenditure Control Act of 1968 which was a temporary surtax of 10% which then fell to 5% and then 2.5%? See PDF below.

http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/projects/bpea/1971 1/1971a_bpea_okun_hymans_taylor_eisner.pdf

I knew libtards like you would jump on this as your "gotcha", but please go back and read my question. I said "START" a war.

What year did LBJ escalate activities in Vietnam? 1968? Now I don't want to get in a debate about who started Vietnam, or when specifically it escalated. I will be generous to your stupidity and give you the benefit of the doubt that LBJ didn't escalate Vietnam until June 8, 1965, when he committed to send U.S. ground forces to South Vietnam.

So it is clear that LBJ escalated/started a war without raising the funds to pay for it. That surcharge tax didn't come until three years in.

EPIC FAIL on your part. Want to try again puddin? Or are you going to threaten to stalk me like you did 007?

We raised revenues to defray the cost of the Vietnam war, as I said we did. We did not do so for Iraq. See the difference?

And I certainly never stalked 007. He wanted to meet and then chickened out. I was not surprised... nor was I surprised at you attempting all sorts of bizarre pretzel logic in defense of your butt buddy.
 
Wrong again dumbass:

US Combat Units deployed in 1965; war ended in 1973
US deficits:
1965 $1.4 billion negative
1966 $3.6 billion negative
1967 $8.6 billion negative
1968 $25.1 billion negative
1969 $3.2 billion positive
1970 $2.8 billion negative
1971 $23 billion negative
1972 $23 billion negative
1973 $14.9 billion negative

Look it up dipshit and become informed instead of a dullard leftist asshat.

again. read my lips: we raised taxes to help defray the cost of the Vietnam war. We did not do that for the Iraq war. See how simple that is?
 
We raised revenues to defray the cost of the Vietnam war, as I said we did. We did not do so for Iraq. See the difference?

And I certainly never stalked 007. He wanted to meet and then chickened out. I was not surprised... nor was I surprised at you attempting all sorts of bizarre pretzel logic in defense of your butt buddy.

You are splitting hairs and you know it. Just admit you are wrong.

I could argue that Bush raised revenues by cutting taxes which increased revenues and that's a fact JACK.

Stop being a pussy and admit you are wrong.
 
Why didn't LBJ raise them when he STARTED the war?

Why did he wait until 1968?

bet you can't answer that can you pussy?

I have no idea, and I don't fucking care. I know that our nation raised taxes to help defray the cost of the Vietnam war and I know that we did NOT do so for Iraq. That was my only point.

pussy.
 
I have no idea, and I don't fucking care. I know that our nation raised taxes to help defray the cost of the Vietnam war and I know that we did NOT do so for Iraq. That was my only point.

pussy.

You are a fucking liar. No wonder 007 kicked your pussy lying ass.

I think I will have to put your dumb fuck, lying pussy ass in Ignoristan.

Don't bother responding mother fucker. Oh and you can tell your pussy son to fuck off too.

;)
 
You are a fucking liar. No wonder 007 kicked your pussy lying ass.

I think I will have to put your dumb fuck, lying pussy ass in Ignoristan.

Don't bother responding mother fucker. Oh and you can tell your pussy son to fuck off too.

;)

no bother... my statement was that no country had ever fought a war without levying taxes to help defray the cost of that war... until Bush. that's true.

and 007 wimped out. my son and I had lunch at his shitty little restaurant and he never showed... but then, I didn't really expect him to. All hat and no cattle... you too.
 
Back
Top