Hilary kicked the Rs asses,quit insulting her

Controlled Opposition said:
First, there is the fact that the Democrats admitted in a court of law that the primaries were rigged for Hillary. They claimed that they had the right to do it.

Second, in Iowa, the Democrats claimed that Hillary won six, sequential coin tosses for tied districts. The odds of that are 64 to 1.
Click to expand...

link
 
Wasserman Schultz, DNC Rigged the Primary, but Judge Dismisses Fraud Suit Anyway

Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, accused in a class-action lawsuit of rigging the 2016 Democratic primary in favor of Hillary Clinton, was cleared of fraud in a Miami federal court last week.

But not before confirming what was already widely suspected: that the DNC did indeed rig the primary.

Wasserman Schultz, former Democratic National Committee chair, became embroiled in a political scandal during last year's U.S. presidential election after a DNC email hack revealed her criticisms of Clinton's Democratic rival Bernie Sanders -- which Sanders' supporters said was conduct that goes against the DNC's official neutrality in primary contests.

The complaint, which involved 150 Democrats, accused Wasserman Schultz and the DNC of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence in the alleged election fix.

More than half of the plaintiffs were Sanders supporters who gave money to his campaign. The suit claimed the plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages in addition to refunds for the money they contributed in good faith.

Federal Judge William Zloch dismissed the suit brought by the plaintiffs' two Miami lawyers, Jared and Elizabeth Beck.

However, the DNC’s attorneys never bothered refuting the lawsuit’s claim that the primary process was biased against Sanders.

Instead, they argued the DNC has a right to conduct primaries however it chooses, and, furthermore, that Sanders supporters knew the primaries were rigged, therefore relieving the DNC of any responsibility it might have had.

This, from the New York Observer: “DNC attorneys claim Article V, Section 4 of the DNC Charter -- stipulating that the DNC chair and their staff must ensure neutrality in the Democratic presidential primaries -- is “a discretionary rule that it didn’t need to adopt to begin with.” Based on this assumption, DNC attorneys asserted that the court cannot interpret, claim, or rule on anything associated with whether the DNC remains neutral in their presidential primaries.”

Also ...

“The Court would have to find that people who fervently supported Bernie Sanders and who purportedly didn’t know that this favoritism was going on would have not given to Mr. Sanders, to Senator Sanders, if they had known that there was this purported favoritism.”

Zloch confirmed this in his judgment: "The Court must now decide whether Plaintiffs have suffered a concrete injury particularized to them, or one certainly impending, that is traceable to the DNC and its former chair's conduct -- the keys to entering federal court. The Court holds that they have not, which means the truth of their claims cannot be tested in this Court."

Elizabeth Beck told Florida Bulldog that confirmation from Russian hackers' released documents convinced her and her husband to go ahead with the lawsuit: “'The lawsuit was filed based on that information. Everyone, including the people who hired us, reached the same conclusion that the process was rigged.'”

Beck also launched a Facebook page that has grown to more than 57,000 followers and started the political action committee JamPAC, Florida Bulldog wrote. She has been using JamPAC’s website to post lawsuit updates and documents.

Sunshine State News was unable to reach Wasserman Schultz over the weekend.



http://sunshinestatenews.com/story/...-rigged-primary-judge-dismisses-fraud-lawsuit
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Wasserman Schultz, DNC Rigged the Primary, but Judge Dismisses Fraud Suit Anyway

Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, accused in a class-action lawsuit of rigging the 2016 Democratic primary in favor of Hillary Clinton, was cleared of fraud in a Miami federal court last week.

But not before confirming what was already widely suspected: that the DNC did indeed rig the primary.

Wasserman Schultz, former Democratic National Committee chair, became embroiled in a political scandal during last year's U.S. presidential election after a DNC email hack revealed her criticisms of Clinton's Democratic rival Bernie Sanders -- which Sanders' supporters said was conduct that goes against the DNC's official neutrality in primary contests.

The complaint, which involved 150 Democrats, accused Wasserman Schultz and the DNC of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence in the alleged election fix.

More than half of the plaintiffs were Sanders supporters who gave money to his campaign. The suit claimed the plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages in addition to refunds for the money they contributed in good faith.

Federal Judge William Zloch dismissed the suit brought by the plaintiffs' two Miami lawyers, Jared and Elizabeth Beck.

However, the DNC’s attorneys never bothered refuting the lawsuit’s claim that the primary process was biased against Sanders.

Instead, they argued the DNC has a right to conduct primaries however it chooses, and, furthermore, that Sanders supporters knew the primaries were rigged, therefore relieving the DNC of any responsibility it might have had.

This, from the New York Observer: “DNC attorneys claim Article V, Section 4 of the DNC Charter -- stipulating that the DNC chair and their staff must ensure neutrality in the Democratic presidential primaries -- is “a discretionary rule that it didn’t need to adopt to begin with.” Based on this assumption, DNC attorneys asserted that the court cannot interpret, claim, or rule on anything associated with whether the DNC remains neutral in their presidential primaries.”

Also ...

“The Court would have to find that people who fervently supported Bernie Sanders and who purportedly didn’t know that this favoritism was going on would have not given to Mr. Sanders, to Senator Sanders, if they had known that there was this purported favoritism.”

Zloch confirmed this in his judgment: "The Court must now decide whether Plaintiffs have suffered a concrete injury particularized to them, or one certainly impending, that is traceable to the DNC and its former chair's conduct -- the keys to entering federal court. The Court holds that they have not, which means the truth of their claims cannot be tested in this Court."

Elizabeth Beck told Florida Bulldog that confirmation from Russian hackers' released documents convinced her and her husband to go ahead with the lawsuit: “'The lawsuit was filed based on that information. Everyone, including the people who hired us, reached the same conclusion that the process was rigged.'”

Beck also launched a Facebook page that has grown to more than 57,000 followers and started the political action committee JamPAC, Florida Bulldog wrote. She has been using JamPAC’s website to post lawsuit updates and documents.

Sunshine State News was unable to reach Wasserman Schultz over the weekend.



http://sunshinestatenews.com/story/...-rigged-primary-judge-dismisses-fraud-lawsuit
Click to expand...

biased reporting
 
evince said:
biased reporting
Click to expand...

Nonsense. By the way, you said that you hate Bernie for claiming that the primaries weren't legit. He didn't say it. You hate on him without reason. You know how to use search engines. Elizabeth Warren and any number of other Democrats say that the primaries were rigged. And IF you read it, you would see that the court ruled that the plaintiffs knew they were rigged but gave money to the party anyway. No dispute. They were rigged.

And then there is the issue of winning six of six coin tosses. Try it for yourself. See how long it takes you to call six out of six tosses.
 
AnglScarlett said:
It's projection.

Reading this board today, after I don't know how long of not reading it, is really shocking.

Superfreak talking to ILA, people who voted for HIllary in the 08 primary, with great enthusiasm, saying she's worse than Trump, supposedly decent people still talking to tom who is still cheerleading rapists, everyone on the right acting as if Trump wasn't installed by a foreign country in a coup, and as if this were any democrat they wouldn't be batshit over it.

The entire board has moved about 300 degress to the right, so anyone who is still normal, is considered unreasonable.

Just an unbiased opinion from the outside looking in. I mean, the right on here is off the wall. As for grind he turned into a full fledged psychopath years ago. I am so happy to see Gen Z taking the field and kicking his stupid, hermit ass though.

The change came, but it was so subtle many missed the que in the music. If you listened very closely you heard it. The right as represented on this board, are no longer fit for decent society. Most know it in real life. that's why they come here to spew.
Click to expand...

More moronic nonsense. It isn't projection. It is reality.

You support the leg humping rape apologist Cypress. So enough of your holier than thou crap too.

The left wing nuts are still here... Desh is a fucking idiot, Thing has become completely unhinged.

Pretending you are unbiased when you know a lot of those you are commenting on is hilarious.

The most vitriolic person on this board is Desh. But you encourage her. You support her. You pretend she is normal. So again, your opinion is not worth much.
 
evince said:
many are Russians


its cheap for Putin to pay people to post

their economy is dead without oil


so they get American idiots to support all kinds of stupid to keep oil king.


some of the people here were always racist idiots

lots pretended to be centrists

they never really were
Click to expand...

this is the 'sane'/'normal' poster... right?
 
zymurgy said:
current polls show people think Hillary is a bigger piece of shit then Trump
Click to expand...

"Then" Trump?

Yeah, she is pretty much neck-and-neck with Orangetweet, isn't she?

Clinton is past history, idiot, but you morons can't let go of her. Why? Because you need cover and diversion for the pathologically lying, incompetent shitstain you put in office.

Suck a Trump dick, pally boy. You are well-practiced at it.
 
domer76 said:
Clinton is past history, idiot, but you morons can't let go of her. Why? Because you need cover and diversion for the pathologically lying, incompetent shitstain you put in office.

Suck a Trump dick, pally boy. You are well-practiced at it.
Click to expand...

I didn't create this thread title moron
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top