Hillary in 2002 - President Bush was "selected not elected"

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Democrats are looking like hypocrites for saying trump can't challenge an election. And democrats will be sorry if someday they think an election was stolen from them.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/clin...g-legitimacy-of-george-w-bushs-2000-election/

oct 20 2016 Given the widespread and bipartisan criticism of Donald Trump‘s refusal to say he’d accept the results of the 2016 election during the final presidential debate, it’s worth noting that his opponent Hillary Clinton has suggested more than once that former president George W. Bush did not actually win the highly contentious 2000 election, and that his brother and then-Florida Governor Jeb Bush may have had something to do with it.

In 2002, Clinton attended a private fundraiser for Democratic Missouri Senator Jean Carnahan in Los Angeles. According to Newsweek, Clinton told the crowd that she believed that Bush– then the sitting president– was “selected,” not “elected.”

Later in 2009, Secretary of State Clinton was holding a town hall in Abuja, Nigeria. When asked about electoral irregularities in the African nation, Clinton said that even the United States was not perfect in that regard. “Our democracy is still evolving. We had all kinds of problems in some of our past elections, as you might remember,” she said.

“In 2000, our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state, so I mean, we have our problems too. But we have been moving to try to remedy those problems as we see them,” she said
Click to expand...
 
Gore won the election.
Bush won the SC case.
Gore was elected.
Bush was selected.
Gore accepted their decision and moved on.
Trumpf is incapable of that.
 
Liberals, when faced with the 2000 election facts

fingers+in+your+ears.jpg
 
Leonthecat said:
Gore won the election.
Bush won the SC case.
Gore was elected.
Bush was selected.
Gore accepted their decision and moved on.
Trumpf is incapable of that.
Click to expand...

elections involve winning the electoral college, not the popular vote, so no, gore did not win the election. by your definition, winning the election just involves getting new york city and california to vote for you.
 
shade said:
elections involve winning the electoral college, not the popular vote, so no, gore did not win the election. by your definition, winning the election just involves getting new york city and california to vote for you.
Click to expand...

You think Trumpf will accept the electoral college ballance when he loses?
 
Last edited:
Leonthecat said:
Gore won the election.
Bush won the SC case.
Gore was elected.
Bush was selected.
Gore accepted their decision and moved on.
Trumpf is incapable of that.
Click to expand...

lol......16 years later Democrats won't accept the fact Gore lost the election and they're complaining won't concede it BEFORE the election happens.....
 
Hillary Clinton will be selected by our evil, all encompassing political machine, so, rightists, there's no reason to waste your time by voting.
 
shade said:
elections involve winning the electoral college, not the popular vote, so no, gore did not win the election. by your definition, winning the election just involves getting new york city and california to vote for you.
Click to expand...

A system in which only California and New York voted would be an ideal system. The rest of the country should be declared "the uncivilized territories" and governed with an iron fist.
 
Althea said:
How many ballots were thrown out for technicalities, even though it was evident who the vote was for?
Click to expand...

it was "evident" to the Dems that every incomplete ballot was evidently for Gore......based on the assumption that all incompetent voters must have been Democrats.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top