Hillary is doomed. Trump has this in the bag.

ZappasGuitar said:
ROFL!

If she's so corrupt, why is it that she's never been convicted EVEN ONCE of any crime?
Click to expand...

Another double standard front and center from the world's biggest hypocrite. I looked up a few of your posts on Zimmerman and you do believe he is guilty, YET HE WAS NEVER CONVICTED OF MURDER.

ZappasGuitar said:
I admitted that I believed Zimmerman is guilty of murdering Trayvon Martin
Click to expand...


ZappasGuitar said:
No further evidence is required...Zimmerman did indeed MURDER Trayvon Martin.
Click to expand...

You have absolutely zero self awareness. You bitch about someone saying Hillary is guilty of corruption and your response is, well, she has never been convicted, while you say that Zimmerman is guilty despite he has never been convicted.
 
tsuke said:
If you think about things critically Trump will be one of the safest bets for president. See the political establishments on both sides dislike him and the most of the mainstream press does as well. There are so many obstructions to his presidency that he can only get things thru if he relies on the bully pulpit, i.e he needs the support of the people. He can talk tough and negotiate but whatever he does he can only do if the public accept it.

Clinton as demonstrated by the emails has the democratic party politicians all wrapped up and even a lot of the media on her side. The GOP and conservative sides will oppose her but that is just standard. Clinton could actually push things like the TPP or another war thru.
Click to expand...

Well, I see what you mean, but it's a pretty dicey option, surely, given the wild nuttiness of Trump?
 
iolo said:
Well, I see what you mean, but it's a pretty dicey option, surely, given the wild nuttiness of Trump?
Click to expand...

its all up to the public. They have to support the "wild nutiness" for him to use the bully pulpit. After all going against free trade and demanding that we raise wages by making sure we give the jobs to citizens rather than illegals, questioning the wisdom of always goign against russia are all "wild nutiness"

It will be nice to have the public and the president allied against congress as opposed to all the politicians allied against the people.
 
tsuke said:
its all up to the public. They have to support the "wild nutiness" for him to use the bully pulpit. After all going against free trade and demanding that we raise wages by making sure we give the jobs to citizens rather than illegals, questioning the wisdom of always goign against russia are all "wild nutiness"

It will be nice to have the public and the president allied against congress as opposed to all the politicians allied against the people.
Click to expand...

Both on slave labour, building the Great Wall? I'd not risk it myself!
 
iolo said:
Both on slave labour, building the Great Wall? I'd not risk it myself!
Click to expand...

slave labour....

I want you to think about something. What happens when you raise everyones wages but reserve a class of jobs whose wages cannot be raised only for a segment of the population. You then argue than the rest of the population cant take these jobs because they would be paid too much and affect the prices for everyone.

Reference it with slaves in ancient rome and untouchables in India.
 
58479235.jpg
 
tsuke said:
its all up to the public. They have to support the "wild nutiness" for him to use the bully pulpit. After all going against free trade and demanding that we raise wages by making sure we give the jobs to citizens rather than illegals, questioning the wisdom of always goign against russia are all "wild nutiness"

It will be nice to have the public and the president allied against congress as opposed to all the politicians allied against the people.
Click to expand...

:rofl2: "Demanding we give jobs to citizens..."

Chinese, Mexican, Dutch, Slovenian and Bangladeshi citizens, you mean.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top