..............
Nope, wrong
..............
Nope, wrong
I have the AP report to support my assertions, you have your loyalty to child molesters to support yours.
That came from what story? I quoted the mother.
..............
The OP. Do you even read stuff that you post about? You got this from some website and didn't even read to find out the facts first, didn't you? Somebody told you that this was about gay rights. It isn't. This person in their majority was having sex with a 14 year old. If a straight dude did that he would also be subject to this law, and as I said, there are a great many men who have served time for exactly this.
This is not something for which I would choose to take up the banner and pronounce support for... If it is wrong for a man to do it, it is wrong even if it is a homosexual doing it. There is no special rules that should remit her responsibility for the actions of an adult with a child.
Bull, according to the story:
The two had a consenting relationship that began soon after Kaitlyn Hunt turned 18
After she turned 18. And for Rana, she may be 15 now, but from what I understand was not when the acts took place. They were "at most" 4 years apart, a portion of time after the 18th birthday she was 14, and the relationship stared "soon after" her 18th...
There are a great many states, including this one, where men have spent time in jail for exactly that.
The AP has their information wrong.
The two had a consenting relationship that began soon after Hunt turned 18, and Hunt Smith said she assumed the younger girl's parents knew that. The younger girl was 14 when the relationship began,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/22/gay-teenager-charges-relationship-girlfriend
Anything else I can help you with?
That may be misinformation. If it isn't then there's a case against her.
You and Rana are the only ones putting out the misinformation. Why dont one of you step on up, copy and paste ANY published source that says otherwise. So far we just get the repeated claim made again and again without a shred of evidence. AND every source any of you have provided, contradicts your claims.
You and Rana are the only ones putting out the misinformation. Why dont one of you step on up, copy and paste ANY published source that says otherwise. So far we just get the repeated claim made again and again without a shred of evidence. AND every source any of you have provided, contradicts your claims.
I could not find the interview I saw on TV last night, so for now I will concede your point, but according to Kaitlyn and her mother, the girls were seeing each other before Kaitlyn turned 18 and it was only when Kaitlyn turned 18 that the parents notified police. They blame Kaitlyn for their daughters homosexuality and while Kaitlyn was 17 there was nothing they could do about the situation.
I could not find the interview I saw on TV last night, so for now I will concede your point, but according to Kaitlyn and her mother, the girls were seeing each other before Kaitlyn turned 18 and it was only when Kaitlyn turned 18 that the parents notified police. They blame Kaitlyn for their daughters homosexuality and while Kaitlyn was 17 there was nothing they could do about the situation.
According to the police report, which I just obtained (my original thread was based upon news reports and the mother's Facebook page), Kate was over 18 when they first had sex. Therefore, I withdraw my support of her case; although I believe laws should be relaxed when kids between 14 - 17 have consensual sex.
Yeah, the mother lied.
Unless the FB page was changed, I think I misunderstood it.