Homosexuality is not a sin

Nordberg said:
You just keep saying things that are not true?
Click to expand...
Projection.

Nordberg said:
Why?
Click to expand...
Because liberals tend to be VERY dishonest...

Nordberg said:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ules-all-states-must-allow-same-sex-marriages
Click to expand...
Summarily dismissed. You cannot use NPR as a source with me. It is leftist fake news garbage. The Supreme Court does not define marriage.

Nordberg said:
You are really quite looney. I read that t oxygen and potassium got married. It came out OK.
Click to expand...
Your issue, not mine.
 
Nordberg said:
You just keep saying things that are not true? Why? https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ules-all-states-must-allow-same-sex-marriages You are really quite looney. I read that t oxygen and potassium got married. It came out OK.
Click to expand...

He's a nutjob. Seriously. Click on his signature and read for yourself. :thup:

The signatures of all three of Sybil's socks lead to the same manifesto.

gfm7175 said:
Sybil isn't here.
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
Sybil isn't here.
Click to expand...


hDkTY6E.jpg
 
(b) A citizen or class of citizens may not be granted privileges or immunities not granted on the same terms to all citizens. Privileges or immunities granted by the Legislature may be altered or revoked.[1]


Employment is at the Will of Either Party not only the employer or the State as the Richest under our form of Capitalism.
 
Nordberg said:
The problem is you cannot understand them. You accept your religion, however you are able to believe it , and think you have a right to impose it on others. There are 3000 religions recognized in America., Excuse me for not thinking yours should determine national policy and it allows you to be cruel and judgemental. The largest demographic is"unffilated' with about 30 percent of the population.
Click to expand...

Making up numbers again. Argument from randU fallacy.

He is not imposing his religion on anybody. That is what YOU are trying to do.

You try to impose the Church of Green upon others by force.
You try to impose the Church of Global Warming upon others by force.
You try to impose the Church of Covid upon others by force.

You try to impose the Church of Karl Marx upon others by force.

These are all fundamentalist style religions. You are a fundamentalist.

Inversion fallacy (projection).
 
zymurgy said:
who cares?

greed is a sin - but also a human condition that will never cease to exist and the catalyst for all kind of wonderful improvements in life - so long as we are under the right economic system (capitalism)
Click to expand...

Capitalism is actually an act of charity, not greed. it is based on serving your fellow man voluntarily.

You voluntarily provide a product or service, at a price others are voluntarily willing to pay for.
They payments keep the company going, and pays for you to have a place to live and put food on your own table.

The people that pay you are also voluntarily providing products and services themselves in exactly the same way.


Theft is based on greed. It is taking wealth by force for your own selfish interest. It produces nothing. This is the way of socialism.
 
Into the Night said:
Capitalism is actually an act of charity, not greed. it is based on serving your fellow man voluntarily.
Click to expand...

absurd

in capitalism - I don't even take into consideration if the other guy got a good deal. the deal is favorable to me - and that is all that is requires - for me to walk away happy.

it is assumed the other party is also happy as they are not forced to act - but I don't care. this is not an altruistic act - to claim it is just shows the depths you go to obfuscate what is simple
 
Into the Night said:
Making up numbers again. Argument from randU fallacy.

He is not imposing his religion on anybody. That is what YOU are trying to do.

You try to impose the Church of Green upon others by force.
You try to impose the Church of Global Warming upon others by force.
You try to impose the Church of Covid upon others by force.

You try to impose the Church of Karl Marx upon others by force.

These are all fundamentalist style religions. You are a fundamentalist.

Inversion fallacy (projection).
Click to expand...

No you recalcitrant retard. I looked them up to make sure. There are 4000 worldwide. However, that does not matter. You assume the religion you have should be law. You are a righty at heart.
Playing opposites again. I have no religion. I think people should decide for themselves.
 
Nordberg said:
No you recalcitrant retard. I looked them up to make sure. There are 4000 worldwide. However, that does not matter. You assume the religion you have should be law. You are a righty at heart.
Playing opposites again. I have no religion. I think people should decide for themselves.
Click to expand...

Sybil is most probably a paranoid schizophrenic living a fantasy life online since, in his case "Elvis never leaves the building". LOL

I strongly doubt he can function well alone on the streets for any length of time. He'd probably end up homeless and living in a shelter at night, on the streets by day.
 
Into the Night said:
gfm7175 said:
You have now become a broken record.
Click to expand...
danialpalos been chanting that for quite awhile. It carries no meaning. He likes to quote phrases from the Constitution of the United States, which he discards. He's down to about 2-3 of them now.
Click to expand...

I love it when socks talk to each other!

Your signature links, posting styles and use of identical posts when irritated gave you away months ago, Sybil. Example:

gfm7175 said:
Sybil isn't here.
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
Sybil isn't here.
Click to expand...

Have you considered mixing it up or are you unable?
 
gfm7175 said:
Projection.


Because liberals tend to be VERY dishonest...


Summarily dismissed. You cannot use NPR as a source with me. It is leftist fake news garbage. The Supreme Court does not define marriage.


Your issue, not mine.
Click to expand...

You keep just playing opposites. You cannot just say things are not true without offering some kind of silly, inane right wing excuse.
NPR is highly respected and very neutral. Do you only accept Infowars?
 
Last edited:
Nordberg said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Ahh, but there is one caveat: two individual gay folk, be they men or women, cannot reproduce through gay sex alone. No man can become pregnant, no woman can impregnate another woman. In order for a married/union gay couple to "have children", the men would either have to adopt or have a surrogate be impregnate by one of the couple. The women would either have to adopt, become one or both artificially inseminated via a sperm bank. Sometimes, a gay couple (male or female) adopts the biological child that one partner had during a "straight" marriage before being divorced.

So one cannot 100% equate on all levels gay marriage to straight marriage

Secondly, when one is born to biologically reproduce with the opposite sex, but their mental and emotional state makes the very idea abhorrent, that is an abnormality. It's common place in the human equation, like astigmatism.

Again, this does NOT make homosexuality a "sin", nor does it justify job or housing discrimination. But society goes through changes, and the eventual outcome will be what it will be. And the band played on.

I've explained this several times and ways in a previous exchange with AProudLefty.
Click to expand...


That is an answer to a different question. We are talking about what is normal not whether sex results in kids. Lots of hetero sex does not result in pregnancy. Lots of heteros cannot procreate. They are still married. Marriage is a legal and binding contract that includes gays in many states.
Click to expand...

Wrong. It is one of the supporting pillars of the LGBTQ mantra that they dare not acknowledge in their quest to have a society that equates LGBTQ as "normal" in comparison to heterosexuality.

You give a perfect example of this mindset; I am pointing NOT to sexual preferences but the BIOLOGICAL REALITIES. What you do is essentially an incorrect knee jerk, because you try to compare biological defects in a heterosexual unions that prevent contraception or a roll of the old rhythmic dice. Gay couples cannot reproduce to have "children" with each other unless it's by the means I previously described, regardless if they are perfectly healthy and fertile. Period. A matter of fact, a matter of biology, a matter of logic. Your last sentence is a moot point that is NOT part of the point I'm making.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Wrong. It is one of the supporting pillars of the LGBTQ mantra that they dare not acknowledge in their quest to have a society that equates LGBTQ as "normal" in comparison to heterosexuality.

You give a perfect example of this mindset; I am pointing NOT to sexual preferences but the BIOLOGICAL REALITIES. What you do is essentially an incorrect knee jerk, because you try to compare biological defects in a heterosexual unions that prevent contraception or a roll of the old rhythmic dice. Gay couples cannot reproduce to have "children" with each other unless it's by the means I previously described, regardless if they are perfectly healthy and fertile. Period. A matter of fact, a matter of biology, a matter of logic. Your last sentence is a moot point that is NOT part of the point I'm making.
Click to expand...

Lesbian rape victims can get pregnant.

Q.E.D.
 
AProudLefty said:
Homosexuals can reproduce. Learn biology.
Click to expand...

two sperms or two ova by themselves wont become a baby.

a homosexual male can, of course, copulate vaginally with a homosexual female and wind up with a baby but that kinda belies the idea that they are homosexual to begin with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top