House Democrats have a list of 85 trump scandals to target with subpoenas

floridafan said:
This has nothing to do with me, Einstein, but everything to do with the new Congress, and the need for oversight that has been sorely lacking these past two years.
Click to expand...

lets not forget the republicans also NEVER investigated Bush for lying us to war and many other things


then they waste millions on false investigations when the people choose a democratic president
 
more will surface once they being getting all the facts


The republican party suckled off the tit of the NRA who was laundering Russian money into campaigns to benefit the republican party and Donny the orange mushroom
 
Nordberg said:
????? that made sense to you. Bannon was the brains behind trump and the father of Repub. nationalism. He was an absolute insider.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry....you're a fucking idiot and you are never right.....meanwhile show us all your evidence of money laundering......oh yeah I forgot......we laughed it all off.....
 
85 is too many. Trump is an easy target because he is not too bright. They should focus on a few of them. Trump has a lifetime of playing fast and loose with laws and regulations. He joked about it before, but it isn't funny anymore.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I'm sorry....you're a fucking idiot and you are never right.....meanwhile show us all your evidence of money laundering......oh yeah I forgot......we laughed it all off.....
Click to expand...

Damn you don't know how anything works, or what words mean. Bannon said money laundering is Trumps worst problem, and you say I should show you proof? And as usual, you have no concept of how the legal system works. Evidence is gathered and then presented in court. But I know that is tough for you to follow, it has escaped you over and over. Really, really do what you do that is similar to thinking and ponder that. First evidence gathered, then presented in court. Not released to the public, even right wing crazies like you. Nope, in court by lawyers. Or by Muellers lawyers.
1. crime
2. evidence gathered to determine who did it and to define it
3. evidence presented in court
Try and remember that
4, decision made. by court or jury
 
Nordberg said:
Damn you don't know how anything works, or what words mean. Bannon said money laundering is Trumps worst problem, and you say I should show you proof? And as usual, you have no concept of how the legal system works. Evidence is gathered and then presented in court. But I know that is tough for you to follow, it has escaped you over and over. Really, really do what you do that is similar to thinking and ponder that. First evidence gathered, then presented in court. Not released to the public, even right wing crazies like you. Nope, in court by lawyers. Or by Muellers lawyers.
1. crime
2. evidence gathered to determine who did it and to define it
3. evidence presented in court
Try and remember that
4, decision made. by court or jury
Click to expand...

sometimes I think you are actually stupid enough to think there is actually evidence out there......you even ignore your own list......first isn't gathering evidence......first is the crime........you made that up and have spent two years trying to make up evidence.....time to admit you've got nothing and move on....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sometimes I think you are actually stupid enough to think there is actually evidence out there......you even ignore your own list......first isn't gathering evidence......first is the crime........you made that up and have spent two years trying to make up evidence.....time to admit you've got nothing and move on....
Click to expand...

PP your ignorance is stunning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top