Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Oh goody. Jarod thinks he has again stumbled on some brilliant gotcha
He can't explain, the DNC talking points memos don't go into that much detail.I'd take that Jerod started over and explained what the fuck he, she, it, was talking about in the original question.
Do you understand you came here illegally now get the fuck out?You can only take legal action if you have jurisdiction?
Do you understand the meaning of jurisdiction?
You still got nothing?
Still nothing. I understand, must pretend to keep up your argument.Well, Merriam-Webster, I guess that settles it, lol. That's where SCOTUS turns to when they need to rule.
The writings of the people who drafted and ratified the 14th Amendment aren't "nothing". It's clear this was never intended to grant citizenship to the children of illegal aliens. It's not even arguable. Your lame attempt to use non legal dictionary definitions to interpret the Constitution is lame. You only fall for these issued talking points because you are told to.You still got nothing?
Still nothing. I understand, must pretend to keep up your argument.
Cite to there writings?The writings of the people who drafted and ratified the 14th Amendment aren't "nothing". It's clear this was never intended to grant citizenship to the children of illegal aliens. It's not even arguable. Your lame attempt to use non legal dictionary definitions to interpret the Constitution is lame. You only fall for these issued talking points because you are told to.
Look it up yourself.Cite to there writings?
Complete nonsense, and utter ignorance.They intended to confirm citizenship to anyone born here and under our jurisdiction. That includes newborns whose parents were here illegally.
Citation required.They did not want an underclass of people not entitled to citizenship, they did now want a new type of slavery.
So you still have nothing. Figured.Look it up yourself.
Complete nonsense, and utter ignorance.
Citation required.
You have no argument. You have never explained your original premise. It's so vague as to be meaningless.You still got nothing?
Still nothing. I understand, must pretend to keep up your argument.
My argument is the clear meaning and the obvious intent.You have no argument. You have never explained your original premise. It's so vague as to be meaningless.
who are you claiming is not under the jurisdiction of the US?How do you deport someone if they are not under your jurisdiction?
No, it's not. Whether you accept that or not, until you clarify your original vague statements to others who are saying they can't understand what you are saying, it's on you for not being clear to them. Give examples of what you mean. That would help.My argument is the clear meaning and the obvious intent.
What do you believe the word jurisdiction means? If they only wanted it to be limited to one type of jurisdiction, why did they use the more general word?No, it's not. Whether you accept that or not, until you clarify your original vague statements to others who are saying they can't understand what you are saying, it's on you for not being clear to them. Give examples of what you mean. That would help.
C5s work, faggot.How do you deport someone if they are not under your jurisdiction?
Murder is illegalC5s work, faggot.
Who's jurisdiction?What do you believe the word jurisdiction means? If they only wanted it to be limited to one type of jurisdiction, why did they use the more general word?
You cannot. If you go to court saying you want to deport them, they point out that you have no jurisdiction, and you have to release them.How do you deport someone if they are not under your jurisdiction?
You have no argument. You have never explained your original premise. It's so vague as to be meaningless.
you're not answering the question. who is claiming that the US government has no jurisdiction?How do you deport someone if they are not under your jurisdiction?
ju·ris·dic·tionWhat do you believe the word jurisdiction means? If they only wanted it to be limited to one type of jurisdiction, why did they use the more general word?